totleytom

Another vote for the 24mm STM. On an 80D it’s a really small and light addition - you hardly know it’s there. The quality is very good, and the lens feels substantial. One thing to be aware of, ...

YMMV, of course; but I had the Canon 15-85 and found the the Sigma 17-70 better. The Canon lens does have longer range, but in the end I preferred the Sigma's better sharpness (in my experience) ...

I continue to be a fan of the Sigma 17-70 f2.8-f4. Good focal length range (28-105 equivalent), faster than the Canon zooms, at least as sharp - what's not to love? I've been using it as my ...

...... Yes. I also think that sharpening the Raw image is likely to increase the apparent noise in JPGs, especially in otherwise clear areas, because the sharpening process will find any ‘edges’ ...

I've completely reprocessed one of the night shots, and it's below. I think it's a lot better now. My workflow was to import the images into LR CC (is that what it's called these days?) on an 11" ...

Yes, these are JPGs exported from LR of the processed raw images. I've just had a quick comparison of one of the JPG files and its raw file, and there's a lot more noise in the JPG than in the raw. ...

I've just returned from a short holiday in Singapore. I took my new 90D with me, plus a selection of lenses (Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4, Canon 70-200 f4 IS, Canon EF-S 24mm STM and Canon EF-S 10-18), plus ...

I love it. I don’t do video, I don’t shoot action, I do travel, landscapes, and casual/family photography. It’s lighter and much easier to hold than an full-frame camera with the appropriate...

I've now taken a couple of hundred shots with mine, and I'm happy. First I love the way the camera feels - much lighter and handier than the 5DIV I've just sold (especially with an L lens on it) - ...

I've tried several Canon EF-S standard lenses, including the 15-85. My personal choice these days is the Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4. I've found it to be sharp, faster than the Canon alternatives, and ...

Thanks for the comments, folks. Let me say that I'm perfectly happy with the camera - I'm just making sure I know what it's going to do! I'm away for a trip in a week's time - a week in Singapore ...

Having updated the firmware on my Sigma lens I think things have changed. Certainly it now appears that the camera is exposing the same way with the Sigma as with Canon lenses. I've revisited a ...

Almost as soon as I'd posted my question, I thought 'firmware!'. So I've been out to my photo dealer (just a few miles away) and have bought a Sigma USB Dock. It turns out that my lens was still ...

I received my 90D yesterday and as you'd expect I've been firing off a number of test shots. Early this afternoon I walked around my neighbourhood and took a number of images. As I was reviewing ...

None of that would be for me! But do you remember the image below, from a few years ago??

The files are quite big - 30+ Mbytes for Raw, and 12+Mb for Fine JPG - so make sure it’s a good size. I shoot Raw + Fine JPG and my 90D is suggesting that the capacity of a 16GB card is 288 shots ...

I agree. I’ve just sold a 5D4. Together with the 24-105 it was over 1.5 kgs, nearly 1.75. Increasingly I found myself just not taking it out, but using a Rebel instead. That’s a strange place to ...

ah, thanks for that info. I never had an 80D; the last XX camera I had was a 60D.

Yes, remove the card. I use an iMac which has an SD slot round the back so that’s easy enough, and when i’m travelling I use my iPad (and iPadOS 13) with an SD card reader. So that all works well, ...

Picked mine up this afternoon - Harrison Cameras, Sheffield, UK - so probably not a lot of help for most people here.... First impressions: definitely not as robust feeling as the 5D I've just ...