23speaker23

Thanks. This lense is indeed very nice. It is reason I don't go RF.

A couple of shots from last night Camera is on the fencing handheld at 1/10 sec iso 2500

Thanks! Another take during blue hour might be in order.

Why so few photos from such a wonderful lens?

Sorry I have not attended to the thread for a while. Nice shots everyone. Keep em coming! The little one on a merry go round.

I like this one!

Nice one!

Indeed :-D:-D

sigma 56 Future photographer - not happy with my lens.. which one?

Thanks all! Glad you liked it. The light was so nice that I had to do very little editting to the image.

Hey everyone. Here's one long exposure blue hour shot I thought was worth sharing. Imatra, Finland.

Dug out my old speedlight 430-ii. It definitely feels huge on such a small camera. Sigma 56.

Great!. Reminded me of Che ;)

I don't think that the stabilized lens block is rigidly parked when IS is turned off. And yes the shutter shock seems to occur on smaller/lighter lenses. However, I've had the m6-ii for about a ...

The problem is in the shutter shock which results in slightly blurred images on pixel level with smaller efm lenses with image stabilization.

Hi there. ## 4 and 5 are very nice. Keep'em coming!

I would disagree. Compared to my 5d mark 2 with 17-40/4, there is no compromise with the 11-22 and m6 (mark 1 or 2). And don't start on the 17-40 being a bad lens... I shot hundreds of great shots ...

I have yet to see the result of the shutter shock on this lens... And my use cases are the same, i.e. landscapes, cityscapes (17-40/4 was my go to lens on the FF dslr). However, there is one more ...

I concur with the previous posts. You can't go wrong with 11-22 if you don't need wide aperture on your UWA lens. It's cheaper than any RF option for your RP. It's sharp across the frame starting ...

+2. this should help.