Timotis77

I found a used Sigma 70-200mm Sport for a good price and went with this over both of these new. I really think you'd be pulling hairs to find a 'major' difference between any of them, you'd be ...

I'd agree with pretty much all thats said here, though I still think even at 35mm wide open the sharpness is still pretty good for the price of this lens. The only other slight issue is focus ...

The post isnt about you, but you've made it about you, offering a picture thats nothing like what the OP showed.... I could post a million picture of flowers, but none of them are using my sigma ...

You both need the eyes tested, and you Chen need to compare a simular picture to what the OP posted. I see the pictures shown to be sharp at the point of focus, its just that the Sigma 70-200mm ...

Looks like fungus or the beginning of and maybe some moist dust on the underside of the lens - Hard to full tell, need s macro shot of it....

I have the 35-150mm 2.8-4  for Nikon -Also love it, the fact that its really a 35mm, 50, 85mm, 105mm and 135mm plus everything inbetween..... Its just a handy lens I find the image quality very ...

I've just got the Sigma 70-200 sport (second hand) but for my D850 - It was either this or the Tamron 70-200 G2 - I only ended up getting the Sigma cos it was well priced for a second hand lens. ...