Lives in Canada Montréal, Canada
Joined on Oct 15, 2013


Total: 171, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

that's a good thing having musiciens photographers.
I want more.....alike plz

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2016 at 14:19 UTC as 17th comment
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2102 comments in total)
In reply to:

George Zip: The level of trolling on DPR is breathtaking. I have all Canon Cameras and they are great. I would never badmouth Nikon or Sony Cameras. Why?? Because they are excellent cameras as well. Different strokes for different folks.

Hey Georges,
Lots of losers that like to troll, and want to tell us the way to spend our money, when we all know that to make a picture, we need any manual dslr, good lens, and artistic taste and post process, the rest is futile.....

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 07:17 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2102 comments in total)
In reply to:

zanypoet: I may be nitpicking ...
I use both Nikon and Canon gear; built-in viewfinder shutter should be a std. feature on camera like this. Nikon has'em on their D800 series.

Otherwise, increased DR on par with Sony and Nikon is a welcome change ...

Oh yeah, and that 1.3 dr will make a dramatic difference ?
I think that you should learn how to use a camera first, cause thats not what we want when we take pictures, its been talk about and people were doing good pics before this DR thing........

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2016 at 06:07 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2102 comments in total)
In reply to:

CameraLabTester: Bravo to Canon and it's DSLRs!

Canon is truly the undisputed King! ... of Incremental upgrades!

The next 5D series you will really want is actually about 3 or 4 upgrades away...

Great going Canon!


If you cant take great pictures with this camera, there is something realy really really wrong with you.

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 22:42 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2102 comments in total)

Its a Canon, well well, its party time for bashing the hell out of it, trolls were waiting for years to bash the 5D4, you can trash it but it will still sell like crazy and make beautiful images as good as it can get, and I prefer Ovf to Mirroless anyday...
Congrats Canon, now I got to sell stuuf to go out and get it

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 07:21 UTC as 464th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

GatanoII: Interesting and informative video and this makes me think:

In this scenario (I must repeat , _in_this_scenario_) it's evident that the direct competitor Nikon D5 should bite the dust , no usable smooth video AF for rapid moving subjects , way slower 4K frame rate for applying slow motion (same separation that exist from usable and useless), "slower" 12fps vs 14fps for getting more decisive moments and far less workable dynamic range for recovering shadows in high contrasty scenes (this is odd and new to Nikon vs Canon) ... and the Canon AF proved, obviously, to be up to the tasks, maybe Nikon could have an easier way to set up to be up to the different tasks, but not enough to separate them, while the pluses from the Canon 1DxII can make a real difference.

So the only think that puzzles me is why DPR did give the same points to the both cameras, since I see substantial advantages/disadvantages where it makes a difference to easily claim a winner.

I cant wait for this DR war to be over, so I get to live to see what will be the next war, chips and soda are on the table

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2016 at 17:22 UTC
On article Setting new standards: Nikon D5 Review (505 comments in total)

Good old Overall score 89%
We all know bout Nikon's scores!
Why dont they give it....88 or 90?

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2016 at 17:38 UTC as 28th comment
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2500 comments in total)
In reply to:

shineofleo: I just got my X-Pro2. Generally I like it. I started from X100 and then X-T1, now XP2. The focus feels better - I am not going to check if it is the fastest in the world, but compared with DSLR, it is all right.

However, I got some minor problem:

1, Flash. I was surprised that I forgot to check this... but no, there is no internal flash, and no free small flash unit such as XT1 did. Well, it is not that important, but anyone can give some good idea about the flash for XP2?

2, The leather case. Not again! Fuji official case blocks the SD card door AGAIN! X100 made this mistake, so Fuji open a door at bottom, then move SD card near battery. But XP2 still makes this ... inconvenient? (sorry I just prefer use card reader...)

3, The AF-L button position... it is so funny that ruin all the excellent grip design...

Again, I love this camera, just find something to say...

I was wondering when you say "compared" to as dslr the focus is as good.
What do you mean exactly, cause my XE2 can't take a dog running in any directions, did they improved this with the X-Pro2?
Glad you like the camera, Fuji makes some nice stuff and great lenses!

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 14:23 UTC

this amount of details is amazing, the 5DS is on my Wishlist for sure!

Link | Posted on Mar 6, 2016 at 13:56 UTC as 20th comment
In reply to:

DualSystemGuy: What's funny is nobody would even know about this "issue" unless Nikon told us, as not even the internet testers found this one. The very few people it did affect could have just gone through the warranty system like anyone else. And people are STILL complaining, jeez. At least they being extremely proactive these days.

it goes both way the bashing, but sincerely its not fun to have you camera fix cause Nikon has low quality control, specially when they had trouble before, and how many people use the camera and dont want to send it cause they need it in their bag for shooting.
It must take a few weeks to get it back or maybe more.

Again, that happened before and should have been taking cared of once and for all!

Link | Posted on Mar 6, 2016 at 13:07 UTC
In reply to:

The Photo Ninja: They lost me after the d800 poor focusing, green screen, and their denial. I've been with Canon for a few years now. Not going back to Nikon. Too bad, I loved my D700 and their lenses too.

poor nikon......will they ever learn

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2016 at 04:58 UTC
In reply to:

Segaman: they should include battered fish to dip in the oily sensor.....if hungry!

that is why I told him bout me shooting under the 1600 iso, or else I see no point in keepers for what I expect from my 6D.
It all depends of what we want as a result!

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2016 at 19:37 UTC
In reply to:

Segaman: they should include battered fish to dip in the oily sensor.....if hungry!

Whatever you say, must be true....
Gee, I wonder what you would do without your D750, all you can say is "if you dont have a D750 its $?!t"
Gee, you must have a fun life always competing for the best.
Still, Nikon will always be associated to oil, look it up on Google
Its not my fault if Nikon have their camera made where they cook battered fish :)

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2016 at 13:08 UTC
In reply to:

Segaman: they should include battered fish to dip in the oily sensor.....if hungry!

I got enough money to own a D750 and great lenses
But believe me, I am in no hurry to make a switch, I would get a 5Dsr before getting a Nikon.
I dont see any point in getting it, sorry
And I hate shooting pass 1600 anyway, they only thing I like bout Nikon is their black......thats about it

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2016 at 06:22 UTC

they should include battered fish to dip in the oily sensor.....if hungry!

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 18:43 UTC as 30th comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

Xentinus: Nikon,
the only thing you are better than Canon is your sensor,which is Sony!
You know what I mean!

Its a good thing canon have great lenses over Sony, so that makes it the best overall system.....and I almost forgot,.....ergonomy baby.....

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 05:09 UTC
On article Delayed: Nikon Japan pushes D500 to end of April (139 comments in total)

there is something fishy-oily bout this :) :) :)

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 15:14 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

Segaman: Mommy look, another camera from Canon that has so so DR.
(Mom) Well its not for landscape you idiot, its for sport and wildlife.
Well can I still come to Dpreview and troll about any Canon stuff?
Of course, its the right place for that, cause the majority is like you, and dpreview would lose too many members if they would apply some serious anti trolling.

Yes sir! 🍻

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2016 at 06:21 UTC
On article X-Factor: Canon's EOS-1D X Mark II examined in-depth (615 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tim Gander: Gotta love the commenters calling this a "brick" and a "dinosaur" and proclaiming that having a mirror is somehow hobbling the usability of the camera. Tell you what, go stick a 600mm lens on your Sony or whatever and let us all know how you get on covering a news or sports event in rubbish weather.

This camera isn't for me, but I do know who it's for and I'm not going to deride it just because it doesn't suit the work I do. I bet there'll be lots of agency photographers getting a nice update in the next spending round and a few freelances will be ready to upgrade older, worn-out bodies.

I rather have a beefy camera for gigs, believe me, its not a option.
With a flash and a big lens, It feel's just great, never had problems!

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2016 at 00:57 UTC
In reply to:

Suntan: Poor, poor man. To be born that way...

... A Canadian I mean.


And if he was american he would have been whitout a that it?

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2016 at 19:42 UTC
Total: 171, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »