-
LOL people who say those things have obviously never used a Sigma 150-600 or a 600/4.
-
don’t bother with the mk1 it has a really slow aperture mechanism and will only shoot about 3fps in CAF
-
Here are two in the field comparisons I have done https://vocal.media/photography/olympus-300mm-lens-shootout https://vocal.media/photography/olympus-lens-shootout-consumer-zoom-vs-professional-prime
-
The 75-300 is a tough lens to shoot but when done right and within its limits it can produce great images. I have almost sold mine a few times now but keep it around for backpacking trips when ...
-
-
-
Unfortunately you will have to send it in.
-
This is exactly why Olympus went with the EVF they did and personally I am glad they did. I am trying to watch a movie on my EVF, so don't need a super high resolution one that will lag when I am ...
-
I didn't click through to the site Maybe he wants to show motion and not freeze the action? Or he made the decision to live with a little motion blur for a few stops lower ISO? My photography ...
-
why do you question his shutter speed? cormorant's are not particularly fast wing flappers. 1/1600 seems about right to freeze the wings.
-
For anyone interested, here are updated versions of my comparisons 75-300 vs 300/4 75-300 vs 50-200 SWD w/ EC-14 vs 300/4 Regards, Phocal
-
I can just looking at the photos in LR without zooming in. But I have been using all the lenses for a long time now and know the clues that give away which lens took which photograph. I actually ...
-
Thank you, really appreciate the comment. Hope you enjoy the lens and camera. For the money there isn't much out there that can beat that combo. I am in the middle of planning a Gates of the ...
-
Since they are dropping m4/3 to focus fully on medium format I highly doubt it.
-
I don't own the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm but I have played around with one. The 150/2 blows it away in terms of image quality. That said, the lens sucks for manual focus. So unless you have a PDAF ...
-
Even the CDAF optimized lenses don't work that well. I have the 14-54 mk2 and it is useless for anything that is moving on my EM5. Just takes way too long to achieve focus. On my original EM1 ...
-
Yes I was. It just needed to dry off and un-fog, no damage done at all.
-
If you are not going to get a PDAF body don't bother with the Olympus 4/3 lenses. I have tried using a few of my 4/3 lenses on my original EM5 and it is just frustrating not worth it. My 50-200 ...
-
It is not a bad a little lens and honestly I put it right up there in quality with the lower end 150-600 lenses from Sigma or Tamron. I think the higher end ones like the Sigma Sport are a touch ...
-
Honestly, not a fan at all
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
Total messages |
3300 |
Threads started |
116 |
Last post |
4 months ago |
Entries |
24 |
Votes cast |
107 |
Last entry |
Feb 13, 2021 |
Photos uploaded |
644 |
Last upload |
4 months ago |
|