Phocal

so find a subject in a better location...…………………………….

has nothing to do with fps...................

no and not sure why you would want to. Oooops, I lied, you can put it on a Panasonic camera

FYI............................ A month or so ago I had contacted Olympus about doing an overhaul on my 150/2 but hadn't had the chance to send it in. So I fired off an email just to confirm what I ...

First.................... Don't bother with cheap 3rd party adapters.  Have seen way to many post where people had strange lens problems and it turned out the cheap adapter was the problem (not ...

you do know the 75 is not weather sealed so you may as well use your Sony............unless you don't mind risking your EM1 with a lens that isn't weather sealed.

I did and they are still softish....................you have to search to find what is in focus and when you do it's the dark eyes and there is so little that it's really hard to tell if it is ...

If you had done a little research (lots of threads here and in the 4/3 forum) you would have know what to expect.  Nothing you report is a "serious" problem and it's all typical of using 4/3 ...

with that I am done with this conversation......................I have to go make money with my photography.  I don't have time to spend all day every day posting on a forum to try and impress ...

You can have feather detail with all those things you mentioned...........it's not that hard

those are not the birds I photograph, just like I don't do much BiF photography...................I mostly shoot gators and the birds I do photograph are a result of what I find while looking for ...

not harsh, just accurate is all..............................yes they are well composed and the exposures are good, but there is little to no feather detail and a lot of them are way over ...

actually the entire razor thin because it's a telephoto lens is really a misconception.  Break out any DoF caluculater and you will see that at the distances most people use a 400mm (800mm ...

he is amazing, isn't he

I would love to see you get close enough to them with a 300mm effective focal length. you are such a tool.............go on thinking you are some great bird photographer with an camera that ...

That is part of the problem...................at a distance.  You talk about using 1600mm of effective reach, you are shooting from to great a distance. Actually it is if you have even decent field ...

Ok, lets do that..................... My Flickr with albums based on lens used and separate album if I used a TC on the lens. The stuff I have uploaded to DPR with lots of full resolution samples ...

I have to ask, do you have some sort of filter on the front?  If so remove it and try. The first photo you are really to far away and seems the camera just missed focus.  The second one is partly ...

LOLOL............ok this seriously made me roll on the floor laughing.  Guess you only look at the threads with the terrible photographers and there are a lot of them in this forum, don't get me ...