Phocal

LOL  people who say  those things have obviously never used a Sigma 150-600 or a 600/4.

don’t bother with the mk1  it has a really slow aperture mechanism and will only shoot about 3fps in CAF

Here are two in the field comparisons I have done https://vocal.media/photography/olympus-300mm-lens-shootout https://vocal.media/photography/olympus-lens-shootout-consumer-zoom-vs-professional-prime

The 75-300 is a tough lens to shoot but when done right and within its limits it can produce great images.  I have almost sold mine a few times now but keep it around for backpacking trips when ...

Unfortunately you will have to send it in.

This is exactly why Olympus went with the EVF they did and personally I am glad they did.  I am trying to watch a movie on my EVF, so don't need a super high resolution one that will lag when I am ...

I didn't click through to the site Maybe he wants to show motion and not freeze the action? Or he made the decision to live with a little motion blur for a few stops lower ISO?  My photography ...

why do you question his shutter speed?  cormorant's are not particularly fast wing flappers.  1/1600 seems about right to freeze the wings.

For anyone interested, here are updated versions of my comparisons 75-300 vs 300/4 75-300 vs 50-200 SWD w/ EC-14 vs 300/4 Regards, Phocal

I can just looking at the photos in LR without zooming in.  But I have been using all the lenses for a long time now and know the clues that give away which lens took which photograph. I actually ...

Thank you, really appreciate the comment. Hope you enjoy the lens and camera.  For the money there isn't much out there that can beat that combo.  I am in the middle of planning a Gates of the ...

Since they are dropping m4/3 to focus fully on medium format I highly doubt it.

I don't own the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm but I have played around with one.  The 150/2 blows it away in terms of image quality.  That said, the lens sucks for manual focus.  So unless you have a PDAF ...

Even the CDAF optimized lenses don't work that well.  I have the 14-54 mk2 and it is useless for anything that is moving on my EM5.  Just takes way too long to achieve focus.  On my original EM1 ...

Yes I was.  It just needed to dry off and un-fog, no damage done at all.

If you are not going to get a PDAF body don't bother with the Olympus 4/3 lenses.  I have tried using a few of my 4/3 lenses on my original EM5 and it is just frustrating not worth it.  My 50-200 ...

It is not a bad a little lens and honestly I put it right up there in quality with the lower end 150-600 lenses from Sigma or Tamron.  I think the higher end ones like the Sigma Sport are a touch ...

Honestly, not a fan at all