Mark9473

I think the Panasonic 14-140 is pretty good for close-ups.

This may help: https://eng-ca.faq.panasonic.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/39420/~/product-guide---lumix---dmc-gx85

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4582784 https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4582796

T.Roll, I want to commend you for one of the best chosen user names in the history of internet fora.

Very nice colour!

GH5S name is taken https://www.dpreview.com/products/panasonic/slrs/panasonic_dcgh5s

It doesn't. All excellent reasons to stick to 1:2 in my experience.

This isn't very convincing though.

@deep7, see here:
https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2019/05/just-the-mtf-charts-micro-43-lenses/

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. But sometimes it's not.

My nominee for the most user-unfriendly software of the last three decades.

DxO for me. I have a few presets ready that give me, with a single click, a set of standard corrections which are all I need for 90% of my images, and are easily adjusted for the remaining images. ...

https://av.jpn.support.panasonic.com/support/global/cs/soft/download/d_pfs10pe.html

If you look at the list of presets on the left, there's an Edit button under it.

Have you looked at the preset in Edit mode to see which parameters are activated?

I didn't even consider the first one a photograph. It's a graphical representation of radio data.

Why would that setting be "correct" if the light itself wasn't neutral?

Apologies if these were already mentioned: https://phillipreeve.net/blog/lenses/ http://www.sassmannshausen.eu/lenses-html/

Yes!

Your X-S1 has 3000 x 4000 pixels, the X-H1 has 4000 x 6000 pixels. A 300 mm lens on the X-H1 would give about the same number of pixels on the subject as the X-S1 at the long end, but I'd expect ...