Bruno Zarokian

@200mm
1/50s:
Z7: 100% excellent
A7: 70% excellent, 10% soft, 20% blurred

1/30s:
Z7: 90% excellent, 10% soft
A7: 40% excellent, 30% soft, 30% blurred

1/20s:
Z7: 50% excellent, 30% soft, 20%...

Seems from the graphs that the Z7 is significantly better between 1/50 and 1/20s at 200mm, where it counts.

@Richard Butler
Small typo: Z7 screen is 2.1Mdots, not 1.2Mdots.
Also the Z7 viewfinder is quad VGA like the Fuji and Sony ones, so should be 3.69 out of consistency, not 3.68, as the others are...

Zeiss (and Leica) publish measures at 10/20/40lpmm, besides that is for the lens at f1.4. Just extrapolating though, the Nikon MTF chart still look better to me. Now there is a difference between ...

Check the MTF charts, they are in a different league, very very impressive... These charts seem to indicate that these lenses are, in terms of image quality, a huge step above the F mount 1.8 ...

Didn't the DPReview crew get 1600 shots on one charge? Can't remember where I saw that, maybe they can chime in.