mr_landscape

Pointless.
Nokia 808 [2012]: 1/1.2".
'Nough said.

Nah. No way Samsung.
Don't believe you. Already seen S20 "ultra".
Resolution don't much tweaked Nokia 808 from 2012.

OV48c looks more promising.

Confirmed. No real competition so far. My hopes for Panasonic CM1 ruined into ashes. It is quite bulky and lens can't hold up agains N808 glass, especially at the border of the frame.

No problemo, it is better in terms of resolution than highly overrated samsung s20 ultra.

>DarnGoodPhotos
>Its easy to be smaller when you remove the viewfinder and use a slower lens.

Who needs tiny viewfinder?
Weather sealing? I prefer smaller form factor than having such protection.

Naaaah, Ricoh gr3 is smaller. Size is mandatory.

https://spacedrone808.blogspot.com/2019/12/xiaomi-mi-note-10-8p-pro-vs-huawei-mate.html#APPS However i've tested them in RAW mode only and with all enhancements turned off. I'm not interested in ...

Added hands-on preview test: Samsung S20 Ultra vs Nokia 808. Check the link in the first post. DETAIL: Nokia 808. S/N RATIO: Nokia 808. DYNAMIC RANGE: Samsung S20 Ultra

No hope coz, similar sensor used in already tested Mi Note 10! And, yes it provides less res than ol'n'mighty 1/1.2 from toshiba. I expect 10% increase in quality in case of Samsung. But price of...

"Pro" version has the same sized main sensor. I don't care fair or unfair, i just choosing best resolution over the other characteristics. Nokia 808 is the best in this case. Looking forward to...

Mi Note 10 provides better dynamic range, but not resolution. You could check my blog for comprehensive test on large sensored deviced. Link to blog could be found at dpreview profile.

Who on Earth cares about front camera? Better improve rear so it could finally beat optical system of 2012 Nokia phone.

Another unsuccessful example of Leica branding is Panasonic CM1. Despite the giant 1" sensor it can't compete with smaller 1/1.2" Nokia 808. Leica optics failed at this time also, but only on...

Sometimes bombastic brand name like Leica on the rear camera of smartphone doesn't mean anything useful. It's like Huawei Mate 30 with awful optical performance. Or Nokia 808 [2012] powered by Carl...

They can, but they don't want to. Nokia 808 from 2012 <5 inch still rocking the place.

If you craving to know you can look into my profile and see the links.
Also, on dpreview forum there is my comparision of large sensored phones.

I don't want to.

p20 pro in this case.

Check out Nokia 808 and Panasonic Cm1 for real quality. Not these pubertal compute phone machines.

Proper night shots on Nokia 808 from 2012 will leave iphone 11 in dust. Period.
If we add to this quality postprocessing: not any chance for tiny sized iphone sensor.