mr_landscape

mr_landscape

Lives in Norway Oslo, Norway
Works as a Microstocker addict
Joined on May 12, 2010
About me:

Professional medium-format photography.
Pentax 645D/Ricoh GRIII/Olympus PEN-F/Sigma SDQ-H/Nokia PureView 808

Comments

Total: 136, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Canon 1DX II? Why?
Samsyasian S21 can't even match patched Nokia 808 from 2012 in terms of provided resolution.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2021 at 08:45 UTC as 13th comment

2500$ for small sized sensor? Strange that they don't put smth like 5000$.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2021 at 19:51 UTC as 54th comment | 1 reply

However you are not talking about reduced lifespan more than double shortage compared to 970 Pro.

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2020 at 05:42 UTC as 13th comment

No mention about sensor size? Is it dpreview or woodshop class?
no 1inch - no buy.

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2020 at 14:50 UTC as 11th comment | 2 replies

Better to improve tiny sensor.

Link | Posted on Jul 24, 2020 at 14:26 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
On article Canon EOS R5 review (2964 comments in total)

ideal tool for microstock 0.1$ shooting, esp the price.

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2020 at 14:17 UTC as 530th comment

This vesion will surely help to advance photo skills for those people who don't have any.

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2020 at 20:49 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

gokhankaya: Which computational mess and confused AI artifacts do you like the most?

i like the luck of resolution. It is so bad that it is barely reaches Nokia 808's performance [released at 2012].

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2020 at 19:10 UTC

Excellent tool for 0.1$ pix at ss. But way too expensive for person who is receiving such donations.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2020 at 19:09 UTC as 4th comment

New level of S##tterstuck is ultra low quality photos taken by complete amateurs on smartphones with tiny sensors. Coz nobody in sane mind would sell art for 0.1$.

DISTILLATION OF CORPORATE GREED.
This marks the end of microstock industry.

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2020 at 17:28 UTC as 3rd comment

Pointless.
Nokia 808 [2012]: 1/1.2".
'Nough said.

Link | Posted on May 25, 2020 at 09:08 UTC as 34th comment

Nah. No way Samsung.
Don't believe you. Already seen S20 "ultra".
Resolution don't much tweaked Nokia 808 from 2012.

OV48c looks more promising.

Link | Posted on May 19, 2020 at 19:45 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

mr_landscape: Naaaah, Ricoh gr3 is smaller. Size is mandatory.

>DarnGoodPhotos
>Its easy to be smaller when you remove the viewfinder and use a slower lens.

Who needs tiny viewfinder?
Weather sealing? I prefer smaller form factor than having such protection.

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2020 at 06:26 UTC

Naaaah, Ricoh gr3 is smaller. Size is mandatory.

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2020 at 22:43 UTC as 82nd comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

mr_landscape: Sometimes bombastic brand name like Leica on the rear camera of smartphone doesn't mean anything useful. It's like Huawei Mate 30 with awful optical performance. Or Nokia 808 [2012] powered by Carl Zeiss crushing easily Xiaomi Mi Note 10 [2019] in terms of effective resolution and optical crispness.

No hope coz, similar sensor used in already tested Mi Note 10! And, yes it provides less res than ol'n'mighty 1/1.2 from toshiba. I expect 10% increase in quality in case of Samsung. But price of 1400€ is pretty insane. For 700$ there is Ricoh GRIII which will deliver waay better quality in almost the same form factor.

Link | Posted on Jan 31, 2020 at 08:27 UTC
In reply to:

mr_landscape: Sometimes bombastic brand name like Leica on the rear camera of smartphone doesn't mean anything useful. It's like Huawei Mate 30 with awful optical performance. Or Nokia 808 [2012] powered by Carl Zeiss crushing easily Xiaomi Mi Note 10 [2019] in terms of effective resolution and optical crispness.

"Pro" version has the same sized main sensor. I don't care fair or unfair, i just choosing best resolution over the other characteristics. Nokia 808 is the best in this case. Looking forward to Omnivision Ov48c sensor, coz there is no hope for samsung s20 ultra.

Link | Posted on Jan 31, 2020 at 07:13 UTC
In reply to:

mr_landscape: Who on Earth cares about front camera? Better improve rear so it could finally beat optical system of 2012 Nokia phone.

Mi Note 10 provides better dynamic range, but not resolution. You could check my blog for comprehensive test on large sensored deviced. Link to blog could be found at dpreview profile.

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2020 at 04:48 UTC

Who on Earth cares about front camera? Better improve rear so it could finally beat optical system of 2012 Nokia phone.

Link | Posted on Jan 29, 2020 at 18:48 UTC as 14th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

mr_landscape: Sometimes bombastic brand name like Leica on the rear camera of smartphone doesn't mean anything useful. It's like Huawei Mate 30 with awful optical performance. Or Nokia 808 [2012] powered by Carl Zeiss crushing easily Xiaomi Mi Note 10 [2019] in terms of effective resolution and optical crispness.

Another unsuccessful example of Leica branding is Panasonic CM1. Despite the giant 1" sensor it can't compete with smaller 1/1.2" Nokia 808. Leica optics failed at this time also, but only on borders of the frame. And yeah it is way better then shiny new Huawei Mate 30. You can observe comprehensive test in my blog, link could be found in my dpreview profile.

Link | Posted on Jan 28, 2020 at 14:07 UTC

Sometimes bombastic brand name like Leica on the rear camera of smartphone doesn't mean anything useful. It's like Huawei Mate 30 with awful optical performance. Or Nokia 808 [2012] powered by Carl Zeiss crushing easily Xiaomi Mi Note 10 [2019] in terms of effective resolution and optical crispness.

Link | Posted on Jan 28, 2020 at 09:12 UTC as 25th comment | 6 replies
Total: 136, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »