R Vaquero

R Vaquero

Lives in Spain Spain
Works as a Photographer
Has a website at www.ramonvaquero.com/en/
Joined on Dec 29, 2006

Comments

Total: 36, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Benchmark performance: Nikon D810 in-depth review (255 comments in total)
In reply to:

JonB1975: "Class leading Dynamic Range" Bit of a shame they took so long to release the review that there's now a DSLR which out performs it....

Which one?

Link | Posted on May 13, 2016 at 13:16 UTC
In reply to:

Akpinxit: Personally , I'm highly impressed of IQ : at any ISO it is indistinctly close to FF D750 . Though if previously thought that crop body will serve as lite alternative - it is not . Surprisingly to me , this time it is the FF D750 100 gr. liter .

The D750 shows better results at high ISO performance in terms of noise. That's not surprising given the different sensor sizes.

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2016 at 20:46 UTC
On article Nikon D5 real-world low light, high ISO samples (281 comments in total)
In reply to:

piratejabez: Anyone else like most of the OOC JPEGs way more than the ACR-processed RAWs?

ACR manages noise reduction worse than Nikon software, either in camera or using Nikon Capture.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2016 at 21:58 UTC
In reply to:

elefteriadis alexandros: Slowly we start to pay the ''made in china'' effect.

The D750 is made in Thailand

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 14:36 UTC

Samsung releases its new iPhone

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2016 at 10:53 UTC as 25th comment | 4 replies

Any chance to use it with Nikkor lenses?

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2016 at 02:40 UTC as 24th comment
On article Nikon releases D500 4K UHD sample video (203 comments in total)
In reply to:

R Vaquero: Ok. Now we want stills samples! :)

Great video by the way

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 21:18 UTC
On article Nikon releases D500 4K UHD sample video (203 comments in total)

Ok. Now we want stills samples! :)

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 21:16 UTC as 34th comment | 1 reply
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1175 comments in total)
In reply to:

R Vaquero: "For further durability, the D500 excludes a pop-up flash"...Why? Does it have anything to do with durability??

Maybe it's better to get it sealed...and cheaper to build.
So the D800/810 shouldn't have pop in flash...

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 21:24 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1175 comments in total)

"For further durability, the D500 excludes a pop-up flash"...Why? Does it have anything to do with durability??

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 21:01 UTC as 277th comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

R Vaquero: Good images, but obviously things like this are not a real wedding work when they are not shot in the same celebration day. Not this case though...

Easy: if the wedding day is just ONE day, previous or after sessions are not wedding photographs. I know this point of view is not shared by a lot of wedding photographers, but many should understand what I mean...
That said, the work from this post is fantastic...and obviosly risky

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2015 at 12:58 UTC

Good images, but obviously things like this are not a real wedding work when they are not shot in the same celebration day. Not this case though...

Link | Posted on Jul 24, 2015 at 23:22 UTC as 16th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

R Vaquero: Nobody has realised how ugly it is... For more than 3000 bucks they should have designed much better...

So, since this day do we have to throw our DSLRS away?
Will your images be much better with more megapixels and less mirrors? Small body with big lenses? New industry invention to keep on selling more cameras? Will I buy one finally? 😄

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 23:33 UTC
In reply to:

R Vaquero: Nobody has realised how ugly it is... For more than 3000 bucks they should have designed much better...

:) The iPhone is a good idea! It's mirroless as well. And cheaper.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 21:05 UTC

Nobody has realised how ugly it is... For more than 3000 bucks they should have designed much better...

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 20:41 UTC as 223rd comment | 7 replies
On article Fast and full-frame: Nikon announces 24MP Nikon D750 (406 comments in total)

Wi-fi, it was about time! Why don't the D810 have any?

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 08:23 UTC as 50th comment | 9 replies
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1983 comments in total)
In reply to:

TBImages: The answer to this question may be obvious to those on this forum exceptionally familiar with the engineering details of the D810, not so much for me....

Is there an impact on dynamic range, noise, etc. when using the D810 in something other than full resolution mode? 20 megapixel or 9 megapixel mode for example?

At least noise is less visible shooting with lower resolutions, don't know about DR

Link | Posted on Aug 23, 2014 at 01:32 UTC
In reply to:

sandy b: Nothing new, except Nikons new policy to react proactivly when an issue comes up. Your D800 as well as many other cameras would exhbit the same dots. I would suggest the Mansurovs test their older cameras too.

http://scottreither.com/blogwp/2012/07/01/nikon-d800-e-long-exposure-issues-problems-2/

Yes ideed, the D800 has the very same issue, but it's shown at 24 x 36 full format. You don't need to set it to 1,2X...

Link | Posted on Aug 21, 2014 at 00:09 UTC
Total: 36, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »