R Vaquero

R Vaquero

Lives in Spain Spain
Works as a Photographer
Has a website at www.ramonvaquero.com/en/
Joined on Dec 29, 2006

Comments

Total: 41, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On article Throwback Thursday: Nikon D70 (220 comments in total)

My first DSLR as well, I did a lot of pro work with it back in the day, and some of my best images so far.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2017 at 07:47 UTC as 7th comment
In reply to:

R Vaquero: I've never liked the subscription model, a lot of upgrades are useless even professionally. We should have the choice of upgrade only when we need it or want it- just like before.
Affinity is a great option, but it lacks the fast workflow for a pro daily use with a lot of images-at least by now. If Seriff take the advantage and makes Affinity really fast and productive, it will be a new standard.

String, nothing to do.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2017 at 07:41 UTC

I've never liked the subscription model, a lot of upgrades are useless even professionally. We should have the choice of upgrade only when we need it or want it- just like before.
Affinity is a great option, but it lacks the fast workflow for a pro daily use with a lot of images-at least by now. If Seriff take the advantage and makes Affinity really fast and productive, it will be a new standard.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2017 at 22:36 UTC as 27th comment | 2 replies

Give me half a dozen, please

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2016 at 08:39 UTC as 24th comment
In reply to:

Linerider: Seriously??
These are points offer nothing new or significant and this is nothing more than click bait!

1: 12MP is good enough?
Then get the Samsung S7, its pretty much got the best phone camera

2: It shoots Raw?
So does the Samsung, and its a year older and cheaper. Why is this news?

3: The iPhone 7 Plus has a proper zoom. Kind of?
Ok, ill give it that, but the Samsung is wider

4: ???

5: The iPhone 7 Plus can do bokeh. Kind of?
There are many apps you can download which can pretty much do the same thing

6: It's optically stabilized.
Again, the Samsung, and cheaper.

7: It's quick, and powerful
Yawn! All new phones are quick and powerful

8: It shoots 4K
Did i mention the Samsung? Did i mention cheaper??

9: It's water-resistant
A year late, a buck short

10: Good iPhone cameras lead to better 'proper' cameras.?
And?? What does that have to do with the iPhone?... specifically??

10.5: It's an iPhone camera.
Irrelevant.
However this can be a minus as well as a plus.

Push the shutter button of a Samsung to take a picture and wait a couple of days to be really taken. Please Apple don't imitate this!

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2016 at 07:56 UTC
On article Benchmark performance: Nikon D810 in-depth review (253 comments in total)
In reply to:

JonB1975: "Class leading Dynamic Range" Bit of a shame they took so long to release the review that there's now a DSLR which out performs it....

Which one?

Link | Posted on May 13, 2016 at 13:16 UTC
In reply to:

Akpinxit: Personally , I'm highly impressed of IQ : at any ISO it is indistinctly close to FF D750 . Though if previously thought that crop body will serve as lite alternative - it is not . Surprisingly to me , this time it is the FF D750 100 gr. liter .

The D750 shows better results at high ISO performance in terms of noise. That's not surprising given the different sensor sizes.

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2016 at 20:46 UTC
On article Nikon D5 real-world low light, high ISO samples (278 comments in total)
In reply to:

piratejabez: Anyone else like most of the OOC JPEGs way more than the ACR-processed RAWs?

ACR manages noise reduction worse than Nikon software, either in camera or using Nikon Capture.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2016 at 21:58 UTC
In reply to:

elefteriadis alexandros: Slowly we start to pay the ''made in china'' effect.

The D750 is made in Thailand

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 14:36 UTC

Samsung releases its new iPhone

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2016 at 10:53 UTC as 26th comment | 4 replies

Any chance to use it with Nikkor lenses?

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2016 at 02:40 UTC as 25th comment
On article Nikon releases D500 4K UHD sample video (203 comments in total)
In reply to:

R Vaquero: Ok. Now we want stills samples! :)

Great video by the way

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 21:18 UTC
On article Nikon releases D500 4K UHD sample video (203 comments in total)

Ok. Now we want stills samples! :)

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 21:16 UTC as 34th comment | 1 reply
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

R Vaquero: "For further durability, the D500 excludes a pop-up flash"...Why? Does it have anything to do with durability??

Maybe it's better to get it sealed...and cheaper to build.
So the D800/810 shouldn't have pop in flash...

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 21:24 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)

"For further durability, the D500 excludes a pop-up flash"...Why? Does it have anything to do with durability??

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 21:01 UTC as 278th comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

R Vaquero: Good images, but obviously things like this are not a real wedding work when they are not shot in the same celebration day. Not this case though...

Easy: if the wedding day is just ONE day, previous or after sessions are not wedding photographs. I know this point of view is not shared by a lot of wedding photographers, but many should understand what I mean...
That said, the work from this post is fantastic...and obviosly risky

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2015 at 12:58 UTC

Good images, but obviously things like this are not a real wedding work when they are not shot in the same celebration day. Not this case though...

Link | Posted on Jul 24, 2015 at 23:22 UTC as 16th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

R Vaquero: Nobody has realised how ugly it is... For more than 3000 bucks they should have designed much better...

So, since this day do we have to throw our DSLRS away?
Will your images be much better with more megapixels and less mirrors? Small body with big lenses? New industry invention to keep on selling more cameras? Will I buy one finally? 😄

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 23:33 UTC
In reply to:

R Vaquero: Nobody has realised how ugly it is... For more than 3000 bucks they should have designed much better...

:) The iPhone is a good idea! It's mirroless as well. And cheaper.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 21:05 UTC
Total: 41, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »