bzanchet

Lives in Brazil Brazil
Joined on Nov 19, 2011

Comments

Total: 63, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »

Too bad they removed the built in flash!!! Do we have to buy it seperately?

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2017 at 15:21 UTC as 42nd comment
On article 2017 Roundup: Fixed Prime Lens Cameras (466 comments in total)

Too bad most of them does not have built in flash, when you attach one the whole point of being compact is wasted.
I love the colors on my RX1 (with a great built in flash) and my RX100, much better than my Fuji X70 (hoped for so much more, selling it, dull colors and soft jpegs).
I wish Sony could make a 28mm fixed lens full frame, myself and everybody who used my camera (no professionals here) complained that 35mm is too close for selfies. That may not be important to most here, but it is a big market share.

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2017 at 11:36 UTC as 57th comment | 4 replies
On article 2017 Roundup: Compact Enthusiast Zoom Cameras (505 comments in total)

Could have added Fuji X70 to this comparison

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2017 at 11:18 UTC as 52nd comment | 4 replies
On article Spoilt for choice: which Sony RX100 is right for you? (306 comments in total)

I still have the original RX100. I bought all the next generations up to the IV and returned them all. The original still has the best JPEG for low ISO, best DR, best colors (at Landscape mode) and the best skintone (portrait mode).

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2016 at 18:16 UTC as 42nd comment | 2 replies
On article CP+ 2016: Hands-on with Nikon DL compacts (310 comments in total)

Cameras seems awsome. I never had a Nikon before, I wonder how the sooc colors looks like, as I hate post processing.

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2016 at 10:29 UTC as 57th comment | 3 replies
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV Review (1562 comments in total)
In reply to:

bzanchet: SOOC Jpegs looks much noisier than the original RX100.

Hi Rishi thanks for the feedback, much helpfull!

Link | Posted on Jul 29, 2015 at 11:42 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV Review (1562 comments in total)

SOOC Jpegs looks much noisier than the original RX100.

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2015 at 19:20 UTC as 217th comment | 4 replies
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV Review (1562 comments in total)
In reply to:

bzanchet: Original RX100 is still the best of the 4 four cameras for stills, much less noise, more natural, organic.

Organic = less artificial.
If you need na evf on a compact camera I know what is your type:
There you are with a beautiful girl (assuming you ever had one) and she is waiting for you to take her picture. Then you take about 5 minutes adjusting all the camera's settings. After taking a "quick" picture you open your bag and try several lenses on your refurbished canon 60D.
Then you tell her that you are going to post process all the images at home and email her in about two weeks.
Then, when she cant stand it anymore, you start explaining the diferences between jpeg and raw.
At the end of the day, the pictures of your naked girlfriend taken by your gardner on his cel phone would still be much better than yours.

Link | Posted on Jul 14, 2015 at 11:53 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV Review (1562 comments in total)

Original RX100 is still the best of the 4 four cameras for stills, much less noise, more natural, organic.

Link | Posted on Jul 14, 2015 at 00:28 UTC as 333rd comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

bzanchet: Looks a huge evolution on skin tone. I have the mkI and returned the mkIII for the horribble greeny yellowish skin tones. Put the 4 Sony RX100 on comparison mode and check the skin tones: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=sony_dscrx100&attr13_1=sony_dscrx100m2&attr13_2=sony_dscrx100m3&attr13_3=sony_dscrx100m4&attr15_0=jpeg&attr15_1=jpeg&attr15_2=jpeg&attr15_3=jpeg&attr16_0=80&attr16_1=100&attr16_2=125&attr16_3=125&normalization=compare&widget=1&x=0.8561918837997943&y=0.17838178758974127
Still the mkI is the winner, but the mk4 looks pretty close.

I have no issues on mkI lens, dont believe all you read on web my friend.

Link | Posted on Jun 27, 2015 at 18:45 UTC

Looks a huge evolution on skin tone. I have the mkI and returned the mkIII for the horribble greeny yellowish skin tones. Put the 4 Sony RX100 on comparison mode and check the skin tones: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=sony_dscrx100&attr13_1=sony_dscrx100m2&attr13_2=sony_dscrx100m3&attr13_3=sony_dscrx100m4&attr15_0=jpeg&attr15_1=jpeg&attr15_2=jpeg&attr15_3=jpeg&attr16_0=80&attr16_1=100&attr16_2=125&attr16_3=125&normalization=compare&widget=1&x=0.8561918837997943&y=0.17838178758974127
Still the mkI is the winner, but the mk4 looks pretty close.

Link | Posted on Jun 27, 2015 at 18:18 UTC as 47th comment | 4 replies

Finally a 28mm lens, perfect for me, definitey selling my rx1 because of this, amazing!!
Wish it had a built in flash though, would have been the ultimate camera.

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 16:50 UTC as 110th comment
On photo Dan_ISO400_f2.8 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

Wow impressive sharpeness and color!! Beautiful girl too!

Link | Posted on May 21, 2015 at 18:37 UTC as 7th comment
On a photo in the Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR Samples Gallery sample gallery (4 comments in total)

Wow impressive sharpeness and color!! Beautiful girl too!

Link | Posted on May 21, 2015 at 18:37 UTC as 7th comment
On article Hands-on with Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 (442 comments in total)

Brilliant camera! Maybe next year we might have a built-in flash and a articulated screen. That would be the best compact ever.
Unitl then I will keep my RX-100 for its compactness or maybe try the Canon G7X.
Ps: beautiful hands of the woman holding the camera.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2014 at 15:24 UTC as 107th comment | 4 replies
On article Sony a6000 Review (902 comments in total)

Wow! Sony is producing the sharpest cameras on the Market IMO. Some better lenses would have made their cameras the best availabe.

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2014 at 16:48 UTC as 205th comment | 1 reply
On article Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review (711 comments in total)

I`ve never seen the DP staff reply so much on the comments section :)

IMO the quality and portability of the RX100 got a big chuck of Sony`s own ILCs sales. I think Canon did not want that to happen, so they keep releasing cameras like this and the EOS-M, with IQ far inferior than their DSLR.

Ps.: I dont understand why manufacturers lately are always setting mutted colors as defaults. I believe that are still a lot of photographers that use Jpegs. My OMD-EM5 got the best auto colors I`ve ever seen.

Link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 00:50 UTC as 164th comment | 1 reply
On article Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II real-world gallery (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jaythomasni: Lens - No Color depth. Low Color resolution or color purity. Low contrast. Low sharpness. More Fuji or Samsung color than canon. Greenish pink rendition due to lens coating.
Sensor - Highlights always washed out or blown. any bright object indoor or outdoor quickly become white blob. Retains Shadow details Though. Highlights gone. DR performance not balanced.

If canon can make this lens to L standards as they did with Pro-1. It should overcome some of the sensor size and DR limitation and give an overall excellent package at a price point. Mediocre glass and sensor..Mediocre JAC pic quality.

I agree. This camera was everything I was hoping for, except the IQ is not. Images are just a bit better than the G15.

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2014 at 13:50 UTC
On article Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II real-world gallery (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

pacnwhobbyist: First of all I think image quality from this camera is excellent. I have analyzed and scrutinized the sample photos 6 ways from Sunday and I find very little to criticize. While not worlds apart, they are a bit better than the Sony RX100 II at closer inspection. Especially the ISO3200 shot.

However, one thing I have noticed from the pictures from this camera vs. the RX100 II...the RX100 II's photos seem to "pop" a little more than the Canon's. The color and contrast are a little more dramatic from the Sony. That might be in part due to the Zeiss lens. The Canon still has nice (and very accurate) colors and I can see how a lot of people would find that more appealing over the Sony. But, me personally, I can't help but like the look of the RX100 II's photos a little better. Maybe I might change my mind once I see more of what the G1X Mark II can do.

I agree! And RX100 is much more portable.
Maybe tweaking the settings on GX1mkII could help achive better images.

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2014 at 12:30 UTC
On article Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II real-world gallery (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

bzanchet: Seems a pretty decent camera. But I think that 100% crop images are very soft and grainy (reminded my old S100), not much detail as I hoped for a camera with this sensor. RX100 is smaller, cheaper and has better 100% crop details, and more mega pixels to crop the image.
Even with the crappy image from the studio scene from dpreview, I bought a RX100. Not one of my shots are like the studio scenes, real life pictures are much much better. I was thinking of buying a GXmkII, but now I`ve changed my mind.

I have to agree with you my friend, RX100 colors on auto mode or P mode standard are awful!
I dont shoot raw or post processing, so after some trials, I set on P mode Landscape all the time, and I got the best colors ever from all the cameras I`ve had, much richer than my old S100 and T5i, even the skin tones.
Give it a shot! Lol.

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2014 at 11:29 UTC
Total: 63, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »