Scorpius1

Scorpius1

Joined on May 23, 2011

Comments

Total: 274, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article 1.4 and More: Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II comparison (243 comments in total)
In reply to:

Daft Punk: A reminder that Canon lenses are the reason to stick with Canon.

The Cameras ? So so. If it was not for the lenses why stick around?

The 1DX mk2 sensor might change that.. we'll know soon!!

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2016 at 03:11 UTC
On article 1.4 and More: Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II comparison (243 comments in total)

Canon L mk2 is the best,Sigma is very close for less $$$.. If money didn't matter I would take the Canon L lens without hesitation.

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2016 at 03:08 UTC as 18th comment
On article Nikon fills in the blanks on professional grade D5 DSLR (550 comments in total)

I'm in for one of these with XQD cards,the D4s was great but this looks perfect for me,resolution is enough and I expect Sensor performance to be even better.

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 19:24 UTC as 116th comment
In reply to:

Frank_BR: When you purchased a MF camera in the era of film, your photos instantly gained 4x more resolution regarding the 135 format. And there were MF cameras, like the Yashica MAT, that cost less than a good 135 camera. Now, when you buy a digital MF camera, the resolution is equal to or slightly larger than that of a camera FF, but you paid 4 to 10 times more. The future of the MF is in danger, no doubt about it.

No real substitute for the bigger sensor,regardless of resolution,DOF is different and color tonality too,I would always prefer a MF camera over 35mm for IQ,throw leaf shutters into the equation and the MF is a completely different tool.

Link | Posted on Dec 24, 2015 at 18:24 UTC
In reply to:

Wubslin: Typical of modern so-called 'culture' that the first instinct when presented with a new manufactured item is to tear it to pieces.

Sympomatic of the moral malaise which has overtaken our society I suppose.

LoL.. Surely this is a joke?

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2015 at 17:34 UTC

The best just got better.. installed it today on 10.10 and its very good!

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2015 at 23:23 UTC as 9th comment
On article Studio tests and samples: Leica SL (beta) (754 comments in total)
In reply to:

GabrielZ: This is what I was expecting unfortunately...that the Nikon and its Sony sensor would outperform the Leica by what seems to be a considerable margin. How much longer can Leica get a way with this premium price/inferior performance thing? Even the new lenses are oversized and underperforming. Makes me start to doubt the image quality of their esoteric M and S series lenses too, are they really as good as everybody seems to think they are?

Have no doubt,the S system is really good!

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2015 at 15:13 UTC
On article Studio tests and samples: Leica SL (beta) (754 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jim Salvas: I expected it was not worth the money, but I didn't expect it could be outshot by cameras at a tiny fraction of the cost. That studio comparison test is devastating. It is outshot by almost every current full frame camera. The Sony A7R II destroys it.

And, for this, you have to give up not only the money but put up with a huge, heavy camera.

Same weight as a D810 and physically smaller,so not exactly huge.

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2015 at 15:12 UTC

Canon should have bought this ,they need the tech!!

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2015 at 10:17 UTC as 5th comment
On article 20:20 vision: Hands-on with Sigma's 20mm F1.4 'Art' (148 comments in total)
In reply to:

Luke Kaven: Since the same questions have come up several times:

Sigma's design strategy with its ART primes is to use a greatly outsized image circle. You can retrofit a tilt-shift adapter through Hartblei, and get easily 12mm of shift and sometimes more. The result is superior edge-corner performance, and improved performance wide open.

In trade, the lens is likely to be larger and heavier than other standard primes. Several lenses have been employing this strategy -- the Nikon 14-24, the Zeiss Otus lenses, the Canon 11-24. They are all big and heavy, but they perform beautifully.

Basically using medium format glass on 35mm,its like using FF glass on APS-C,you get the best edge performance!!I like the Otus range but they're huge,anyway kudos to Sigma for turning things around in such spectacular fashion!

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2015 at 10:11 UTC
On article A lot to Leica? Hands-on with the Leica SL (Typ 601) (1497 comments in total)
In reply to:

Scorpius1: It will sell,it uses M,S & R lenses and costs about as much as D4 or 1DX.

Yes,its a different market as there are no super tele's from Leica but people who have a lot of Leica glass will love this,I have S glass and wouldn't mind this as a second body,it will be a toss up between this of the D5 when its released.

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2015 at 15:52 UTC
On article A lot to Leica? Hands-on with the Leica SL (Typ 601) (1497 comments in total)

It will sell,it uses M,S & R lenses and costs about as much as D4 or 1DX.

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2015 at 13:57 UTC as 194th comment | 3 replies

I think its beautiful,great vision.

Link | Posted on Oct 12, 2015 at 18:23 UTC as 19th comment
In reply to:

Boissez: The amount of bickering about the iPhones and their specs borders on the fanatic.

Apples rarely flaunts their specs around, and by the end of the day that's hardly what matters in a smartphone anyway. You can't spec your way to a good user experience.

And people also seem to forget that the supposedly lowly specced iPhone 6 actually outperformed any of the other flagships from 2014: http://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles

its all about the OS for most people,iOS users are used to iPhones and like to use them.. vice versa for Droids!!

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2015 at 22:15 UTC
In reply to:

cmvsm: Sony and Panasonic seems to be the only ones innovating these days. My next purchase will most likely be with them. Maybe Nikon will have another boring release of the D3400 or D7300 where the highlight is a slight movement of the controls. Canon and Nikon are becoming the Blackberry of the camera world.

But Canon & Nikon do have excellent Glass to offer.

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2015 at 20:12 UTC

Nice camera but sony really need to sort out the RAW file,the user should be able to make his own choice!!

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2015 at 21:56 UTC as 223rd comment
On article The new Canon 35mm F1.4L II will be a thing of beauty (230 comments in total)
In reply to:

Thorgrem: Isn't 2100 euro a little bit to much if you can get a excellent Sigma for 750 euro? Yes, sure this lens will also be excellent but is the difference worth 1350 euro?

Street price will be much lower after a few months!

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2015 at 14:26 UTC
In reply to:

Prognathous: Nice money-is-no-object camera. Less appealing if money is of *any* importance (compared to a camera like the Pentax 645z for example, which for all intent is just as capable).

@Prognathous "Most of the Pentax lenses were disappointing, not even in the same league as Leica S glass, and lacking the sparkle I enjoy from my Zeiss glass."

http://diglloyd.com/blog/2013/20130427_1-Pentax645D-vs-NikonD800.html

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2015 at 19:42 UTC
In reply to:

Prognathous: Nice money-is-no-object camera. Less appealing if money is of *any* importance (compared to a camera like the Pentax 645z for example, which for all intent is just as capable).

@Prognathous ,Both Ming Thein and Lloyd Chambers have siad the S glass is superior,the S also has leaf shutters and the Z has none that I know off,I also know someone that owns a Pentax Z and he agrees the S glass is better,Lloyd has demonstrated that teh D810 with Otus glass can outresolve the 645Z with its pentax glass.

I do think the 645Z is a very good camera but if you are interested in using the sharpest glass then the S is the best system,I have all the lenses ,i built the collection up over the last few years,my shooting buddy uses a Phase one IQ280 and he is still impressed with leicas S glass and its look and color!!

BTW ,I also have a D810 and used a Hasselblad H4D 50 for 3yrs,the Blad was nice but I had to make a choice and I prefered S glass rendering!

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2015 at 19:39 UTC
Total: 274, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »