Joined on May 23, 2011


Total: 287, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

erichK: Mega- corp Apple is a disgusting company. Its suppliers (FoxPro) have to put up suicide nets outside their factories. They have every yuppy gimmick but any kind of daycare at their huge megabuck office. They treat their users like illiterate, childish idiots - and do everything they can to turn them into And their products are all about toxic waste and designed obsolescence: Neural Net, the local repair centre just informed me the Apple refuses to supply parts for computers more than three years old ...or even keep them on the part info on their database.

Pointless comment targeting Apple, Foxconn supplies most of the global tech industry, not just apple.

Customers of Foxconn include Acer, Amazon , Google ,Dell, Blackberry , Nintendo, Microsoft,Intel, HP, and Motorola.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2017 at 05:08 UTC
In reply to:

Arca45Swiss: Is this the new Mac Pro Tim Cook promised? A souped up iMac ?

No, that is expected next year.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2017 at 05:02 UTC
On article First shots from new Nikon 28mm F1.4E ED (224 comments in total)

I really like these images, I have the 24mm 1.4 but I'm considering trading if for this 28mm, I prefer the FoV.

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2017 at 13:20 UTC as 33rd comment
In reply to:

Scorpius1: I'd love one of these, maybe one day!

Thats my Plan!! ;-)

Link | Posted on May 11, 2017 at 10:47 UTC

I'd love one of these, maybe one day!

Link | Posted on May 10, 2017 at 15:15 UTC as 44th comment | 2 replies

That 150mp sensor is going to make a lot of glass look bad! Dynamic range should be interesting.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2017 at 01:42 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

rfsIII: Lars,
I'm confused why this particular computer got singled out for special attention? 16gb of RAM is barely adequate to run Photoshop let alone Premiere and there is no mention of the GPU which is as important or even more important than the CPU for imaging editing.
Did I miss something?

16gb of RAM will easily run PS , the only issues you might have is if your working with stitched files from an 80mp back.

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2017 at 22:12 UTC
On article The whole nine yards: Canon 35mm F1.4L II USM review (338 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nick Brundle - Photography: It seems simple to say it, but photography should always be fun. It is great to have ones work published on the internet and nice to make money from it, but at the same time, one should always enjoy the process of taking the picture.
Buy this little beast of a lens if your really serious about your passion. 5 years from now when you see the results you'll look back and say to yourself "Glad I bought that lens"

An added bonus is that if you buy it at the right price you could sell it in 5yrs without a loss.

Link | Posted on Dec 7, 2016 at 01:46 UTC
On article Lensrentals tears down the Nikon 105mm F1.4 (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

noflashplease: Just how much cost cutting is acceptable in a $2,200 lens? For this price, I'd expect a ring ultrasonic motor, not a geared micromotor. The rest of the build looks cheap and old fashioned as well. This is what I'd expect from bargain bin 3rd party lens of yesteryear, not a Nikkor at this price level.

And yet the optional performance is top class.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2016 at 23:22 UTC
In reply to:

Ben Stonewall: My man servant thinks it's ghastly.
He much prefers the Billingham 550.
"Everyone knows you're a proper photographer when I carry the Billingham Sir."

Billingham canvas is excellent and waterproof, leather isn't great in the rain and its heavy.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2016 at 21:11 UTC
In reply to:

Tazz93: Half a million in Canon glass... you would just think there is a more efficient way to get this done.

But it's definitely interesting.

Average cost of a scientific telescope is $25 million, or you could go all in for the James Webb telescope at $8 billion.. ;-)

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2016 at 11:23 UTC
In reply to:

Mordecai Papamichaels: 1000$ too expensive.

By next summer you'll pick it up for $2400.

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2016 at 23:31 UTC
On article Phase One XF IQ3 100MP update adds electronic shutter (22 comments in total)
In reply to:

otto k: Ouch, two things. It might be ocd speaking but I just find it uncomfortable to see a camera (especially such a camera) resting on the lens hood.
Second, while I understand the price of the camera itself due to much larger sensor, etc, the price of grip just makes no sense at all. There is virtually no reason for that price other than profit.

Like Hasselblad & Leica S, the market is small for this camera and this drives up prices for everything in the system.

I read recently that developing a lens costs between 1 & 3 million dollars.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 00:32 UTC
On article Nikon 105mm F1.4E ED sample images (279 comments in total)
In reply to:

Scorpius1: I've ordered one of these, Lloyd Chambers is also very impressed with it!

@c45 , where did you get the 51% figure from?

@MikeF4Black, do you really think I'll buy a lease just because someone else told me to?The lense is getting very good reviews , the test shots look good and my dealer who is very brutally honest also said its very good, and if it turns out to be a be a dud or bad sample I'll return it, which wouldnt be the first time!!

There is nothing wrong with taking some advice on equipment!!

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2016 at 02:27 UTC
On article Nikon 105mm F1.4E ED sample images (279 comments in total)
In reply to:

Scorpius1: I've ordered one of these, Lloyd Chambers is also very impressed with it!

I trust his judgement , he is on the money far more often then not, but regardless of Lloyds opinion I do think its great anyway.Kudos to Nikon for making it!!

I'd bet the price will drop in a few months as well, like it does with most new Glass!

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2016 at 17:09 UTC
On article Nikon 105mm F1.4E ED sample images (279 comments in total)

I've ordered one of these, Lloyd Chambers is also very impressed with it!

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2016 at 13:59 UTC as 60th comment | 5 replies
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (147 comments in total)
In reply to:

DavidsfotosDotCom: What's the dynamic range?

14 stops.

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2016 at 13:16 UTC
In reply to:

mosc: 0.64 crop right? So that 150 would be 96mm f1.8 equiv? I'm confused. Is the sensor even bigger than I'm thinking?

That's slightly more depth of field (smaller aperture) than the 85mm f1.4 sigma art that just came out.

This system can shoot at very shallow DOF in bright light, your 35mm system would need ND filters to do the same!!

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 13:02 UTC
In reply to:

Ugo78: I've always heard that medium format was THE way for the shallowest DOF possible. Maybe it is correct for the analogic medium format, but it seems that it's not true anymore for the digital one, usually sporting a "mere" 0,6... crop factor (if not higher).
The FF system seems more capable of providing the shallowest DOF, offering lenses like 24 f1.4, 35 f 1.4, 50 f1.2, 85 f1.2, and so on...
Am I missing something?

For fashion photography these MF lenses can do shallow DOF in much brighter light.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 12:59 UTC

I tried this app for the first time last week and very impressed, its a real bargain at the price !!

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2016 at 14:30 UTC as 11th comment
Total: 287, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »