Holger Drallmeyer

DarnGoodPhotos, Well that's not even 10% of the gear I actually use. Feel free to look up my profile on Flickr if you wan't to see diverse use of gear.

Yeah I guess instant gratification is then name..

In the end though it'll never be a tintype, just something you wish you could actually make.

All those effects can be achieved with 4 clicks in any decent editor.

Wow, 12 bucks for some precanned uncreative garbage.

Don't confuse noise with grain. Totally different animals.

I just wonder why most snowflakes never hit my windshield even though they are on a direct collision path??

aaaand???

Seriously? Do you have to drag Claus, Rudy and their ride into this?? You must be joking.

Yeah I get it. Drones can do a lot of damage to a plane. However, I wan't to know how many attempts did it take to hit that wing in a controlled environment such as this one? Just curious.

What are you suggesting here???

Sign in with your Google account....yeah right :D Did't we just go through all that with Facebook's app debacle?

Well yeah. The 16-35 is at least 10 years younger than the 17-40. You'd hope Canon did some improvements in 10+ years.

Can you point me to some samples?

Lol, not coming at anyone here bro :D

Nothing against Sigma. They make some great glass also. However, I can't think of one bad L lens from Canon ever.

And that's why I shoot Canon. Quality glass.
I shut up right here.

Now why would anyone say "I don't shoot 50mm" ?
What had 50mm done to you? :D

It's probably me or my monitor but these samples are some of the worst I've ever seen. Let's not hope that these samples represent the camera's capabilities but the photogs shortcomings.

SaltLakeGuy, I'd love to see one of your 1999 samples please :D