ecm

I doubt 35mm film was resolving as much detail as a 24MP sensor, let alone 42 or 50 MP. And yet, there are a lot of amazing photos taken with 35mm film in the past (the best estimate I've come ...

And yet the E-M5 goes everywhere with me, while my d5500 sized Canon t3i stays home. I think that comparison you linked to does the arguing for me - you're comparing 3 weather resistant ...

My lower-budget answer to your question last year was a used Olympus E-M5 and 12-50 (24-100 equ.). Excellent quality images, weather proof even in Ireland in the spring, smaller and lighter than a ...

In 1987 I spent 3 months bicycling around Europe, a once in a lifetime trip, with a Minolta Hi-matic F with a 37 mm f/2.7 lens. I got all the shots I wanted to get. Go for it. I actually had a ...

I had a similar problem a few years ago with a camera that had the battery out for a few weeks, and so it was set for for January 1, 2001 when I put a new battery in and used it. I used Irfanview ...

Olympus (or Canon or Fuji or whoever) HAVE to produce SOMETHING - ie, new stock to sell - and so they just doll it up with new plastic, and plunk a new number on the front, rather than producing ...

I subscribe to Outdoor photography and B&W mag. Aperture is ok. The rest aren't worth it to me.

I suspect there have been more than a few paid Sony shills posting here and elsewhere, extolling the virtues of these cameras. It got pretty ridiculous for a while here on DPR forums - you ...

@dpfan32:
Yeah, I saw that a little after I posted.... sigh. I personally don't mind the 16MP sensor, as long as it has the same characteristics as the one in the E-M5 II. There's really not much...

Lol! An almost unknown Chinese camera maker, a total newcomer to the m4/3 world, gets the 20MP sensor, but Panasonic's newest m4/3 cameras do not? HUGE black eye for Panasonic! I am waiting with...

My interpretation of your question is, "Do you delete the awkwardly posed, not-quite-right, but otherwise technically acceptable photos?" My answer is, no, I don't. HDDs and Blu-ray media are ...

I've already started the experiment. I purchased a used Olympus E-M5 with 12-50mm lens for $499 about 18 months ago. I have no desire to "upgrade" again, I get perfectly excellent photos that I can ...

I agree  with this advice - I was having some of the same issues with hands, so I started taking a cheap Calcium/vit D supplement every day and it seemed to help immensely. Even if it doesn't help ...

Still don't care. Hope the loss of connectivity options and Apple's rather cynical efforts to lock in profit margin - by forcing 3rd party vendors to use Lightning connectors and thus pay Lightning...

My ca. 1979 Nikon EM has a depth of field switch on the front. So does almost every Nikon dSLR ever made. It's basically a marketing lie by Apple. I can get real-time DOF review on my Olympus E-M5 ...

I had more experience with this 10 years ago when I was printing at a local pro photography place, so I'll warn you that I may be a bit out of date. (1) JPEGs are usually fine for printing - most ...

It's a good camera, but sounds like overkill for what you want to do. You don't mention lenses, which will make a big difference. You also don't mention what kinds of things you will be shooting; ...

Sub $100 to $200: - an old 35 mm body with 35 or 50 mm lens - some b&w student film from freestylephoto.biz - a dark bag, developing tank, and cheap D76 based chemicals - and a scanner. Should be ...

My current system is the Olympus E-M5. I chose it because it was: 1. cheap - $499 used with the 12-50mm lens. 4000 shutter actuations, basically still new. 2. water "resistant"- I bought it for an ...

"Some day I'll get to be there!" Sorry, feeling a bit crispy right after my latest 168 hour shift....