ecm

Lives in United States NH, United States
Joined on Aug 16, 2004
About me:

Using cameras:
- OMD E-M5, 12-50, Panny 45-200, FL36 flash.
- Pentax Q7 with 02 and 06, Pentax AF-200FG flash.
- Panasonic ZS50/TZ70

Equipment used in the past:
- Panasonic LF-1
- Panasonic G5, 14-45.
- Canon T3i, 18-55 II and 55-250, Yongnuo YN565EX.
- Panasonic ZS15
- Pentax Q. Better than the reviews indicate.
- Oly E-PL1 with trashy collapsible lens. Good riddance.
- Oly E-300, 14-45, 40-150.
- Olympus C-5060WZ with underwater housing.

Really old stuff to play with once in a while:
- Nikon FG-20 and EM 35mm.
- OM 50 F/1.4, 200 F/4, 300 F/4.5.
- Koni-Omega Rapid 6X7 with 90mm, Voightlander Bessa 6X9, Ansco 6X6.

Comments

Total: 106, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Throwback Thursday: Olympus C-3040 Zoom (119 comments in total)

This was a great series of cameras by Olympus - I still have a C-5060 that I still pull out on occasion. As long as I keep it at ISO 80 or 100 it produces lovely photos that easily hold their own against any modern point-n-shoot camera.

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2016 at 14:18 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

Roland Karlsson: Modular sounds so fun. But, as for some below, then the reality strikes me. Phones do not last long.

+1

I still have an Olympus C-5060WZ bought in 2004, it still takes great pictures even now. It cost $500 - I've taken thousands of good photos with it over 12 years, and I'll get thousands more.

My first smart phone was an iPhone 3GS (out-of-contract price ~$600) in 2010 - it stopped working in 2 years, first due to a bad battery, then due to planned obsolescence on Apple's part. Since then I've had 4 more cell phones....

There's no way I'd invest more than a few dollars in an accessory specific for something as short-lived as a cell phone, it's ridiculous.

Link | Posted on Nov 9, 2016 at 15:55 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: Fujifilm F10 (121 comments in total)

I gave one of these to my wife and she liked it; until it was stolen from her car at any rate. It really did have good high ISO output for a compact camera.

I know everyone is talking about the "great Fuji color" they got with theirs, but I found it's output to be quite bland or perhaps "understated" - color was accurate, but not as "punchy" as JPEGs from the Olympus E-300 or C-5060WZ I was using at the time.

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2016 at 13:10 UTC as 75th comment
In reply to:

Petrogel: Glassholes remastered !!!!

Let's see.... "Glasses" = "Glassholes"; "Spectacles" = "?". "Creeptacles"? - but not catchy enough.

We have an opportunity here, folks! We can name a new species of thoughtless, socially stunted, self-serving a-holes before they even appear in the wild!

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2016 at 15:21 UTC
On article New kid on the block: YI M1 review (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

ecm: Lol! An almost unknown Chinese camera maker, a total newcomer to the m4/3 world, gets the 20MP sensor, but Panasonic's newest m4/3 cameras do not? HUGE black eye for Panasonic! I am waiting with great anticipation for Olympus' next consumer camera - if it has a 16MP sensor I'll bet it costs them dearly.....

@dpfan32:
Yeah, I saw that a little after I posted.... sigh. I personally don't mind the 16MP sensor, as long as it has the same characteristics as the one in the E-M5 II. There's really not much difference between 16 and 20 MP for resolution. I just think the 20MP sensor is the better sensor, looking at results from the Em-1 II.

It's gonna suck to be an Olympus marketing rep, tho - "Less megapixels means smaller files to store!" or maybe "Less pixels mean bigger pixels!" might work..... Well, I'm looking forward to the Christmas fire sale next year.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 11:58 UTC
On article New kid on the block: YI M1 review (706 comments in total)

Lol! An almost unknown Chinese camera maker, a total newcomer to the m4/3 world, gets the 20MP sensor, but Panasonic's newest m4/3 cameras do not? HUGE black eye for Panasonic! I am waiting with great anticipation for Olympus' next consumer camera - if it has a 16MP sensor I'll bet it costs them dearly.....

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 15:57 UTC as 191st comment | 2 replies

Still don't care. Hope the loss of connectivity options and Apple's rather cynical efforts to lock in profit margin - by forcing 3rd party vendors to use Lightning connectors and thus pay Lightning patent fees - doesn't catch on in the Android phone world. I have bluetooth headphones and they're great right up til the batteries run out.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2016 at 15:02 UTC as 123rd comment | 9 replies

My concern about USB C audio is that it HAS NO STANDARD YET - Intel and others are working on it as we speak, nobody even knows where the DAC and amp are supposed to be - the phone? Adaptor? In the headset itself? So whatever native USB C headphones you buy, they're likely not gonna work in a couple years.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2016 at 13:07 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ecm: Nonstandard headphones? Forced to choose whether to charge your phone OR listen to music? Nah, not gonna end up in my pocket. Doesn't matter if its "the latest and greatest" if its a sh!tty idea.

@EthanP99
That's a pretty big bee in your bonnet.... Yes, I did "miss the part"- what article are YOU reading? I see nothing about 15 minutes or 8 hours. Not sure why it would be noteworthy anyways, my day is a lot longer than 8 hours; if I owned this phone I'd be without tunes for part of it - the vital parts, when I'm waiting or resting, have the time to listen and access to a plug-in.

My present LG G4 phone is a far better solution; QC 3.0 gives me a day's charge in 30 minutes, and swappable batteries when there's no plug to be had. AND I can use my excellent old Sennheiser earbuds.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2016 at 13:05 UTC

Nonstandard headphones? Forced to choose whether to charge your phone OR listen to music? Nah, not gonna end up in my pocket. Doesn't matter if its "the latest and greatest" if its a sh!tty idea.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2016 at 01:21 UTC as 19th comment | 6 replies
On article Power Zoom: Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100/TZ100 Review (342 comments in total)

I know a lot of folks already really love this camera - but I am unhappy; I guess because I was expecting too much.... With a 1" sensor and a much limited but useful-range zoom, I thought this might be it - a large sensor camera with a sharp, usable wide to moderate telephoto lens. After all, Panasonic makes darned good fixed long zoom lenses, my old ZS15 attests to that.

But, "soft"? "Noise reduction obliterates detail"? This does not sound like the Panasonic I know.... I already get that from my ZS50 - why would I spend so much for what sounds like exactly the same problems? Very disappointed.... going to cry in my corner now.... :\

Link | Posted on May 18, 2016 at 22:58 UTC as 27th comment | 3 replies
On article Samsung unveils 256GB EVO Plus microSD card (90 comments in total)
In reply to:

ecm: Heh, what a price. I just bought a brand name 128 GB card for $30 a couple days ago - admittedly U1 but I don't need U3.

IMO it's that U3 rating that's bumping the price of this new card so high - when I was shopping I noticed that brand name 128 GB U3 cards are still rare and priced between $90 - $199 depending on speed rating; double that for a 256GB U3 card, and then add in the bleeding edge tax - $250 is getting pretty close to reasonable.

@ Tonkotsu Ramen:
I can certainly see that someone might want to keep everything plus the kitchen sink on their phone..... However I personally can't imagine needing or wanting it - 256GB would hold all the digital photos I've taken in 15 years and all the music I've bought in the last 25 years, with room left over for days of video and thousands of photos - but I don't want to keep 10,000 photos of the cat on my phone, nor do I want to listen to Bryan Adams again....

I think the point someone made earlier about 4K video is more to the point - it's gonna be a pig to record and store, and a card this size and speed will be very useful.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 22:41 UTC
On article Samsung unveils 256GB EVO Plus microSD card (90 comments in total)

Heh, what a price. I just bought a brand name 128 GB card for $30 a couple days ago - admittedly U1 but I don't need U3.

IMO it's that U3 rating that's bumping the price of this new card so high - when I was shopping I noticed that brand name 128 GB U3 cards are still rare and priced between $90 - $199 depending on speed rating; double that for a 256GB U3 card, and then add in the bleeding edge tax - $250 is getting pretty close to reasonable.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 02:40 UTC as 8th comment | 6 replies

Wouldn't the sensor need to be re-calibrated for flat plane and rotation if you took it off it's mount like that? How would you do such a thing without specialized testing equipment?

The host site's name is "Ifixit" - does Panasonic even sell parts to the general public to repair a camera like this by yourself?

Other than "Ooooh, that's cool!" is there really a reason to do this? Guess I don't get it.....

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2016 at 14:36 UTC as 6th comment | 3 replies
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15/TZ25 Review (4 comments in total)

I loved my ZS15 too - I bought the ZS50 to replace it because I love viewfinders, but it's just not as good; the images from the ZS50 are noisier and not as sharp especially in the corners; the camera is significantly bigger - I was so disappointed. The viewfinder was not worth it; too small. If you've got one, keep your ZS15 close to your chest, don't let it go..... I'm hoping the ZS100 is going to be the one to replace it.

Link | Posted on Feb 29, 2016 at 00:35 UTC as 1st comment
On article Opinion: Enthusiast compacts have finally come of age (483 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mato34: Panasonic LF1?

I am hoping the ZS100 is up to the LF1's performance - I loved that camera! It may have had issues otherwise (battery drain!) but the 28-200mm lens was excellent and the 1/1.7" sensor was really good; it rivaled my Pentax Q's image quality (which in turn was superior to any non-dSLR I've ever owned.....). 25mm short end will definitely be useful, too.

Link | Posted on Feb 29, 2016 at 00:22 UTC
On article #1 in France: Hands-on with DxO ONE (278 comments in total)

Oh, blah. A horrifically expensive cell phone camera, just what I needed - now I can throw my OMD E-M5 in the garbage, thank goodness! The absence of zoom, lack of manual controls, requirement for a $600+ cell phone to work, and garbage ergonomics must really make it fly off the shelves. Honestly, it looks like a stupid test to me.

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2015 at 02:25 UTC as 20th comment
In reply to:

Lab D: Just read nerd2's classic comment abour how since f2.8 on m43 is really f5.6, and so apsc with an f5.6 lens is better. I bet he still doesn't get why that is so funny.

Sorry, I don't usually get in the way of trolls, but nerd2 - just.... wow. You don't really understand what the equivalence issue is about, do you? Perhaps you need to re-read the DPR articles. Spewing misconceptions and half truths again, again, again.... makes you look like an....

Link | Posted on May 24, 2015 at 11:22 UTC
In reply to:

ecm: What? No WiFi means no printing from a phone.... Who does canon think their market is with this printer? Not a typical dSLR owner, I have an inkjet printer for my photos so I can print larger than 4x6.

I got the Selphy 910 for my daughter just a few weeks ago specifically because it prints directly from an iphone. She's having a blast with it; its with teens like her they've got a real market; she loves sharing prints with friends.

It would if it were an android.... She could also download her shots to iTunes and print from there, but she doesn't want to f around with flash drives and computers and whatnot, she just wants her photos to print. Too many companies make the mistake of thinking that their customers appreciate, understand and enjoy technology as much as they do - but 99% do not.....

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2015 at 02:34 UTC

What? No WiFi means no printing from a phone.... Who does canon think their market is with this printer? Not a typical dSLR owner, I have an inkjet printer for my photos so I can print larger than 4x6.

I got the Selphy 910 for my daughter just a few weeks ago specifically because it prints directly from an iphone. She's having a blast with it; its with teens like her they've got a real market; she loves sharing prints with friends.

Link | Posted on Apr 18, 2015 at 00:06 UTC as 6th comment | 2 replies
Total: 106, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »