ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 617, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On article Fujifilm X70 Review (364 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: The lens is the main part of the camera. If there is no sharpness at all, how to use such camera?

Fujifilm X100 - ISO1600 is real ISO1000, ISO3200 is real ISO1012, ISO6400 is real ISO1076.

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2016 at 13:26 UTC
On article Fujifilm X70 Review (364 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: The lens is the main part of the camera. If there is no sharpness at all, how to use such camera?

Don't compare apples with oranges. You try to avoid discussion to another side. Good photo with good sharpness will be better. Good photo with bad sharpness won't be better. As for high ISO - Fujifilm X100 had ISO trick - indicated ISO and real ISO had a big difference. It's hard to say anything about X70 without DXO tests. Anyway, photography needs light. No light - no photo. You can make good noise reduction in RAW converter with GR or Nikon A, but you can't change lens of X70 :)

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2016 at 12:14 UTC
On article Fujifilm X70 Review (364 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: The lens is the main part of the camera. If there is no sharpness at all, how to use such camera?

as for me, it's sharpness of mediocre zoom lens, not fixed one.

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2016 at 08:29 UTC
On article Fujifilm X70 Review (364 comments in total)

The lens is the main part of the camera. If there is no sharpness at all, how to use such camera?

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2016 at 04:54 UTC as 58th comment | 15 replies
On a photo in the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III Real-world Samples Gallery sample gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: P&S camera's IQ.

Lower than 1 stop in terms of noise. But I say about IQ.

http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX100-IV-versus-Pentax-MX-1___1033_854

Sony's ISO400 is real ISO301, screen SNR18% -28.7 dB, ISO400 of MX-1 is real ISO356, SNR18% - 25.9 dB. Sony has the same SNR18% at ISO800 (real ISO597). It means the difference of SN is the diffrence between real ISO597 and ISO356. It's lower than 1 stop.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2016 at 11:15 UTC
On a photo in the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III Real-world Samples Gallery sample gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: P&S camera's IQ.

I hope that 1" sensor is better than 1/1.7"...But it's very close. Maybe JPEG from RAW could be better?

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 19:05 UTC
On a photo in the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III Real-world Samples Gallery sample gallery (5 comments in total)

P&S camera's IQ.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 17:05 UTC as 1st comment | 4 replies

As for me 12800 is the limit

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2016 at 16:29 UTC as 94th comment
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2136 comments in total)

A6000 has sharper pictures

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2016 at 05:30 UTC as 329th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

ogl: Who are the buyers of this system...?

Nothing is wrong, it should be the necessity to buy

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 12:50 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: Who are the buyers of this system...?

My friends with money use smart-phones to take pictures :)))

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 07:05 UTC

Who are the buyers of this system...?

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 06:17 UTC as 59th comment | 11 replies
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2481 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: I see Nikon D5500 beats Fuji in terms of noise...

The problem that we don't know if Fuji's ISO6400 is real ISO...:) Fujifilm X100's marked ISO6400 is real 1076...
http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Fujifilm/FinePix-X100---Measurements

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 15:09 UTC
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2481 comments in total)

I see Nikon D5500 beats Fuji in terms of noise...

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 05:39 UTC as 112th comment | 3 replies
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2481 comments in total)

1700 USD for APS-C camera when there are FF cameras from 1200 tilll 1900 USD....

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 05:36 UTC as 113th comment | 3 replies
On article Canon announces budget-friendly EOS Rebel T6 (1300D) (884 comments in total)

For what?

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2016 at 07:00 UTC as 65th comment
On article Great Eight: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review (537 comments in total)

subject tracking is failed.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2016 at 16:25 UTC as 136th comment
On article Great Eight: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review (537 comments in total)

I would say that no any good photos from 16 samples in continuous shooting...

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2016 at 16:23 UTC as 137th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ogl: Quattro H is compatible with Sigma FF lenses only

It's said in Sigma's official data sheets. APS-H camera is compatible with FF Sigma lenses, APS-C with APS-C lenses.

Easy to understand such simple fact. No any mask or APS-C mode for APS-H camera. Sigma OFFERS two different solutions.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 11:37 UTC

Quattro H is compatible with Sigma FF lenses only

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 21:05 UTC as 141st comment | 3 replies
Total: 617, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »