ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 749, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On article Throwback Thursday: Fujifilm F10 (122 comments in total)

I had this camera and it was very good. The photo looked like film.

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2016 at 13:12 UTC as 75th comment
In reply to:

marco1974: Anyone who's used those table tennis bats knows that after a short while that rubber finish is going to look like CR*P.

M.

We liked to rub ping-pong racket's cover by fingers in childhood

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2016 at 09:28 UTC

Does it usable cover?

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2016 at 09:26 UTC as 86th comment

First One. Good lens.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2016 at 16:49 UTC as 74th comment
On article Fast and light: Nikkor 24mm F1.8G ED lens review (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Sigma at f1.4 is a bit sharper than Nikon at f1.8.

yes

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2016 at 15:31 UTC
On article Fast and light: Nikkor 24mm F1.8G ED lens review (159 comments in total)

Sigma at f1.4 is a bit sharper than Nikon at f1.8.

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2016 at 14:46 UTC as 57th comment | 3 replies
On article 2017 Roundup: Fixed Prime Lens Cameras (466 comments in total)

RX1 RII $3,898.00 and Leica Q $4,250.00...........Hmmmm.....Rather interesting recommendation...
If I have such money, I never buy this cameras...:)

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2016 at 12:30 UTC as 86th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ogl: They know that camera could be overheating...
It could heat till 70C. Wow...The battery (even 3200 mAh) is really weak.
Expensive camera with a lot of minuses. The only one unique thing - not big for MF camera.

Supported by facts. 1. Bad EVF. 2. Short time battery life . 3. XD lenses are not MF FF. 4. Overheating. 5. High price. 6. No good ergonomics.
If they say about overheating, it's really any kind of problem. If it's not problem, nobody from official representative never mention it.

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2016 at 11:42 UTC
In reply to:

Tom Caldwell: I am a Ricoh fan. Pity that I have abandoned the dslr concept, have no modern Pentax lenses, not interested in Medium Format, am also not interested in 360 degree images and my GR is working fine and will do for many more years. Maybe the GXR line concept can be resurrected but no mention was made.

All very bullish about what they can do but I would be a little more concerned that quite a few others would not share this enthusiasm.

The new lenses will be on sale next year.

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2016 at 07:30 UTC

I think GR could be made with short wide-angle zoom (equiv.21-36 mm) -
14-24/3.5, for example. F3.5 could be good compromise for compactness of lens and camera. IMO. 21 mm is good for landscapes, 36 mm is very good for all kind of shooting.

All weather with removable EVF is outstanding travel gear.

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2016 at 07:28 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

Class A: Nice to hear confirmation that the K-1 has been selling very well! The apparent commercial success rhymes with the popularity and acceptance rate the K-1 has very quickly gained in Pentax-specific forums.

The K-1's handling is deeply satisfying and it achieves gorgeous results, in particular with the Limited lenses.

Well done Ricoh! The enthusiastic reception of the K-1 is a well-deserved reward for the respective development investment.

Russia is European market. :)

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2016 at 07:13 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: They know that camera could be overheating...
It could heat till 70C. Wow...The battery (even 3200 mAh) is really weak.
Expensive camera with a lot of minuses. The only one unique thing - not big for MF camera.

I have right to post any opinion which doesn't break laws.

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2016 at 18:45 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: X1D+30+90 = 15 700 USD

Who will be the users of this system?
The system has no any serious advantage over classical MF cameras at all.

There was cheap MF film camera in Soviet Union. Lubitel 166. It was mass-production and everyone could buy this gear. It was made 1.400.000 cameras of different modification. It was real national camera.
Fuji and Hassy don't make mass cameras, alas...

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2016 at 08:31 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: new Pentax 70-200/2.8 is $1,796.95

I've just compare prices...:) K-1 is $1,800 in USA.

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2016 at 05:48 UTC
In reply to:

DavidsfotosDotCom: Anyone see the X1D prices?

9000 USD body only

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2016 at 04:08 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: They know that camera could be overheating...
It could heat till 70C. Wow...The battery (even 3200 mAh) is really weak.
Expensive camera with a lot of minuses. The only one unique thing - not big for MF camera.

deep7. you keep on insulting me?

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2016 at 04:07 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: They know that camera could be overheating...
It could heat till 70C. Wow...The battery (even 3200 mAh) is really weak.
Expensive camera with a lot of minuses. The only one unique thing - not big for MF camera.

The question is not to buy or to buy. We just discuss and exchange opinions.

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2016 at 04:00 UTC
In reply to:

Class A: Nice to hear confirmation that the K-1 has been selling very well! The apparent commercial success rhymes with the popularity and acceptance rate the K-1 has very quickly gained in Pentax-specific forums.

The K-1's handling is deeply satisfying and it achieves gorgeous results, in particular with the Limited lenses.

Well done Ricoh! The enthusiastic reception of the K-1 is a well-deserved reward for the respective development investment.

Triplet Perar. For example, 645 lenses have been always available in Russia for many years, all lenses. What are you talking about? Russian photo market is not big, by the way. But we can buy ANY Pentax 645 lens.

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2016 at 18:46 UTC
In reply to:

zakaria: What about many versions of GR like what Sigma did with dp models.
GR with 14 mm f 4. GR with 35 mm f 1.8. GR with 70 mm f 2.4.
I prefer to buy 14 mm and 35 mm versions. Forgot to mention the sensor must be APS-C and the body comes with built-in VF. Ricoh is working for premium. OK this body is a premium for me.

70/2.4 is not right way. IMO. Wide-angle and standart version are more attractive.
Add ALL WEATHER version of GR :)

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2016 at 18:43 UTC
In reply to:

Class A: The Fuji GFX 50s is neat, but I don't think it will be able to compete with the 645 system in the long run. While both share the same sensor size at the moment, the 645 system can grow to feature a full-size 60mmx45mm sensor whereas the mount size of the Fuji suggests it will always be stuck in "baby-MF" land.

AFAIC, the Fuji is better characterised as an "FF+" camera. The classic and common MF film cameras featured larger formats and the 645 system can evolve into a "full MF" system without users having to change their lenses (or even the mount).

Personally, I think the 645 has further advantages (OVF instead of EVF, plus adequate hardware controls rather than featuring a limiting retro-approach). However, I am aware of the fact that others come to a diametrically opposed conclusion. To each their own.

Plus - No overheating, better battery, more lenses, good ergonomics.

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2016 at 18:41 UTC
Total: 749, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »