ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 621, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On article Waterfails: We test Pentax K-1's Pixel Shift (225 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Never used ACR. I don't care about ACR. I'd like to add - they use f16 for tests...To use f16 is useless. The resolution is rather low and the diffraction already started with 36 MP FF camera at such aperture.

Anyway...f16 is no good for resolution tests.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2016 at 15:24 UTC
On article Waterfails: We test Pentax K-1's Pixel Shift (225 comments in total)

Never used ACR. I don't care about ACR. I'd like to add - they use f16 for tests...To use f16 is useless. The resolution is rather low and the diffraction already started with 36 MP FF camera at such aperture.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2016 at 14:13 UTC as 32nd comment | 4 replies
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1090 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Good machine with no good colour. It seems to me the colour is sacrificed to all functions.

Terkwoiz - why do you think that all information has the link in internet? :)

Link | Posted on May 29, 2016 at 13:07 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1090 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Good machine with no good colour. It seems to me the colour is sacrificed to all functions.

I'm not fan of any brand. It's silly. I don't care what is the best or the worst. I just say D500's colours are no good for my eyes.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2016 at 13:05 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1090 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Good machine with no good colour. It seems to me the colour is sacrificed to all functions.

Сolour filter arrays could be ordered by the manufacturer. As well the improvements in microlens could be ordered. There is main version of sensor and there are the revision of sensors. That's why ALL cameras in RAW with the same sensor have different colours. Do you want argue about it? Could be closed, but never be 100% the same.You can't make 100% identical colour from, for example, Nikon and Pentax camera with the same SONY sensor even in converter. K-1 and D810 are different, colour nuances are individual. JPEG engine is another story - it's work of software. If you have a look at DXO information about camera's colour, you can see the difference even in cameras with the same sensor of different camera's makers.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 04:13 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1090 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Good machine with no good colour. It seems to me the colour is sacrificed to all functions.

Colour filters for sensor are different for each camera of different manufacturer. It's fact. It couldn't be fixed by software at 100%. Yes...You can change a lot of settings in RAW converter, but you can't change colour filters. It's forever. My eyes don't like D500's pictures colours. The bleached colours. It looks like somebody is grudge to add blue, green and red...

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 15:23 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1090 comments in total)

Good machine with no good colour. It seems to me the colour is sacrificed to all functions.

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 13:05 UTC as 84th comment | 13 replies

It's was my favourite photo site. Immortal memory to Michael.

Link | Posted on May 19, 2016 at 18:47 UTC as 180th comment
In reply to:

zeratulmrye: not bad optical quality but the weight and size... geez

Weight and size are good.

Link | Posted on May 19, 2016 at 14:46 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: The problem is not body shape of K-1. The problem is Sigma doesn't follow the specs of K-mount and makes mount ring of bayonet wider. For example, 70-200/2.8 II HSM has 65.7 mm, the original Pentax lenses has 58.5-59 mm, the max. diameter should be not wider than 63 mm. The widest diameter of original Pentax lenses is 63 mm.

I think Sigma is junk. Was, is and will.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 14:07 UTC
In reply to:

Jonathan F/2: Will Sigma replace the part that gets scratched?

The specs of K-mount could be found in every original Pentax lens. FA50/1,4 has 63 mm. It's the widest variant.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 14:04 UTC

The problem is not body shape of K-1. The problem is Sigma doesn't follow the specs of K-mount and makes mount ring of bayonet wider. For example, 70-200/2.8 II HSM has 65.7 mm, the original Pentax lenses has 58.5-59 mm, the max. diameter should be not wider than 63 mm. The widest diameter of original Pentax lenses is 63 mm.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 04:16 UTC as 9th comment | 13 replies
In reply to:

Jonathan F/2: Will Sigma replace the part that gets scratched?

88SAL - No. You are wrong. The problem is not body shape of K-1. The problem is Sigma doesn't follow the specs of K-mount and makes mount ring of bayonet wider. For example, 70-200/2.8 II HSM has 65.7 mm, the original Pentax lenses has 58.5-59 mm, the max. diameter should be not wider than 65 mm.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 04:13 UTC

The problem is simple - Sigma even can't produce mount ring for K-lenses under specification - not wider than 65 mm (max. diameter), never checked the real diameter of real Pentax cameras - 58.5-59 mm, doesn't pay any licence fee to Pentax. It's Sigma's fault and they will fix it. It's good.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 03:58 UTC as 10th comment

Make "Turn LCD off" in menu and you get camera without LCD.

Link | Posted on Apr 30, 2016 at 15:12 UTC as 64th comment | 2 replies

Pentax K-3II is a bit sharper in RAW

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2016 at 17:54 UTC as 104th comment
In reply to:

ogl: Like nothing

I like the beauty, not everyday's hell.

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2016 at 12:32 UTC

Like nothing

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2016 at 06:13 UTC as 14th comment | 3 replies
On article Fujifilm X70 Review (370 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: The lens is the main part of the camera. If there is no sharpness at all, how to use such camera?

Funny... how do you explain the difference between software ISO and measured ISO? For example, indicated ISO1600, 3200, 6400 of X100 are the same ISO1000 as DXO had measured. All other cameras have same trick only in expanded mode. Expanded mode is software ISO too.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2016 at 02:57 UTC
On article Fujifilm X70 Review (370 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: The lens is the main part of the camera. If there is no sharpness at all, how to use such camera?

Do you insist on that there is no real ISO in camera? The ASA and DIN film speed standards have been combined into the ISO standards since 1974.
The current International Standard for measuring the speed of color negative film is ISO 5800:2001 (first published in 1979, revised in November 1987) from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Related standards ISO 6:1993 (first published in 1974) and ISO 2240:2003 (first published in July 1982, revised in September 1994, and corrected in October 2003) define scales for speeds of black-and-white negative film and color reversal film, respectively.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2016 at 02:56 UTC
Total: 621, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »