ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 684, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On article Canon EOS 5D Mark IV added to studio scene comparison (363 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Sony A7R II, Pentax K-1 and Nikon D810 are sharper and better in RAW than new 5D.

K-1 with PS is the 100% winner

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2016 at 17:48 UTC
On article Canon EOS 5D Mark IV added to studio scene comparison (363 comments in total)
In reply to:

bildsee: The Canon bodies have an AA filter. Sony A7RII and Nikon D810 haven't.
Look at the historical scene and you will detect much more details with the non AA bodies dearly payed with very pronounced moire and false color artifacts (e.g the back of the picture frame on the easel). The moire is visible with the RAW files, only. But the "rainbows" are also visible in the JPGs.
So this comparison basically opposes the technology of AA filtered sensors with non AA filtered sensors. Or in other words, does it make sense to compare the resolution of a camera body with AA filter to a body w/o it?

(https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=canon_eos5dmkiv&attr13_1=canon_eos5dmkiii&attr13_2=nikon_d810&attr13_3=sony_a7rii&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=100&attr16_1=100&attr16_2=100&attr16_3=100&attr171_3=off&normalization=full&widget=1&x=-0.5693745506829619&y=0.1931219905502753)

K-1 with PS is the winner

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2016 at 09:12 UTC
On article Canon EOS 5D Mark IV added to studio scene comparison (363 comments in total)

Sony A7R II, Pentax K-1 and Nikon D810 are sharper and better in RAW than new 5D.

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2016 at 09:09 UTC as 32nd comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

ogl: 35/2 has HUGE distortion...Hope this lens is better...

http://www.photozone.de/fuji_x/985-fuji35f2?start=1
A barrel distortion of 4.1% is heavy for a prime lens

35/1.4 is much better

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 13:00 UTC

35/2 has HUGE distortion...Hope this lens is better...

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 16:16 UTC as 16th comment | 8 replies
On article Tamron files patent for 115mm F1.4 VC lens (65 comments in total)

Hope it will be new Pentax DFA115/1.4 DC AW

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 14:14 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply

The Worst Games in the history in terms of guarding

Link | Posted on Aug 6, 2016 at 18:10 UTC as 75th comment
In reply to:

ijustloveshooting: exceptional lens,,,there're many bokeh freaks like me,,,this lens will trigger GAS of many people. i hope it has great sharpness wide open, with very fast AF and buttery bokeh...this lens alone would be reason to buy a nikon FF body.

Nothing special

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2016 at 07:21 UTC

Better to produce 105/2 with 14-15 blades aperture. :)

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2016 at 07:16 UTC as 91st comment
In reply to:

ijustloveshooting: exceptional lens,,,there're many bokeh freaks like me,,,this lens will trigger GAS of many people. i hope it has great sharpness wide open, with very fast AF and buttery bokeh...this lens alone would be reason to buy a nikon FF body.

Silly idea

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2016 at 07:12 UTC

Is there any sense to produce 105 mm with f1.4 - it's tiny DOF. 2200 USD is too high price.

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2016 at 07:10 UTC as 94th comment | 6 replies
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: AF test is not valid, because they can't create the same light condition and don't use the same lenses. They compare apple with oranges.
Imaging resource uses the same SIGMA lens with different mount for testing cameras.

DPREVIEW -
You could compare the cameras of the same brands - for example, K-1 and K-3II.
You could compare K-1 in APS-C mode with APS-C cameras of P, N, C and S of the same price level.
You could compare K-1 with FF cameras of the same price range.
It would be INTERESTING.

And you should keep the same light condition, condition of test and the same DOF

Everybody know that D5 and 1Dx have better AF than K-1 without tests. It's different league and to make conclusion based on comparison with the best reportage cameras in the world is simply SILLY.

In the tracking (riding in curves) test, the K-1 lost focus because the target left the focus area. That may be considered unfair.

please, go here and discuss http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4025698

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2016 at 10:53 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: AF test is not valid, because they can't create the same light condition and don't use the same lenses. They compare apple with oranges.
Imaging resource uses the same SIGMA lens with different mount for testing cameras.

DPREVIEW -
You could compare the cameras of the same brands - for example, K-1 and K-3II.
You could compare K-1 in APS-C mode with APS-C cameras of P, N, C and S of the same price level.
You could compare K-1 with FF cameras of the same price range.
It would be INTERESTING.

And you should keep the same light condition, condition of test and the same DOF

Everybody know that D5 and 1Dx have better AF than K-1 without tests. It's different league and to make conclusion based on comparison with the best reportage cameras in the world is simply SILLY.

In the tracking (riding in curves) test, the K-1 lost focus because the target left the focus area. That may be considered unfair.

D750 - man, you are wrong. My friend uses D750. It's not miracle at all. Better in AF-C than K-1 - just a bit, maybe. It depends on LENSES. It's LAW.
A7RII is mirrorless camera with a lot of AF sectors in LV.

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2016 at 10:25 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: AF test is not valid, because they can't create the same light condition and don't use the same lenses. They compare apple with oranges.
Imaging resource uses the same SIGMA lens with different mount for testing cameras.

DPREVIEW -
You could compare the cameras of the same brands - for example, K-1 and K-3II.
You could compare K-1 in APS-C mode with APS-C cameras of P, N, C and S of the same price level.
You could compare K-1 with FF cameras of the same price range.
It would be INTERESTING.

And you should keep the same light condition, condition of test and the same DOF

Everybody know that D5 and 1Dx have better AF than K-1 without tests. It's different league and to make conclusion based on comparison with the best reportage cameras in the world is simply SILLY.

In the tracking (riding in curves) test, the K-1 lost focus because the target left the focus area. That may be considered unfair.

Show me, please, the list of lenses for AF-C tests with K-3, K-3II and K-1 and the detailed results with each lens. Do you have it?

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2016 at 10:22 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)

AF test is not valid, because they can't create the same light condition and don't use the same lenses. They compare apple with oranges.
Imaging resource uses the same SIGMA lens with different mount for testing cameras.

DPREVIEW -
You could compare the cameras of the same brands - for example, K-1 and K-3II.
You could compare K-1 in APS-C mode with APS-C cameras of P, N, C and S of the same price level.
You could compare K-1 with FF cameras of the same price range.
It would be INTERESTING.

And you should keep the same light condition, condition of test and the same DOF

Everybody know that D5 and 1Dx have better AF than K-1 without tests. It's different league and to make conclusion based on comparison with the best reportage cameras in the world is simply SILLY.

In the tracking (riding in curves) test, the K-1 lost focus because the target left the focus area. That may be considered unfair.

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2016 at 07:42 UTC as 175th comment | 5 replies
On article Samsung launches first removable UFS memory cards (177 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: It's some kind of revolution for DSLR's card speed.

it will be not micro cards only I think

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2016 at 04:02 UTC
On article Samsung launches first removable UFS memory cards (177 comments in total)

It's some kind of revolution for DSLR's card speed.

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2016 at 17:56 UTC as 46th comment | 3 replies
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: If to compare K-1's AF with Nikon D5/D500 and Canon 1Dx - it's really worse
But is there any sense in such comparison? No.

Nikon 810 is very close to K-1's AF - it depends on lenses, of course.
Some of Pentaxians have the both cameras and found K-1+85/1.4 is even better than D810+85/1.4G.

RS - First of all, you should compare AF of cameras of the same system. K-1 with K-3II and K-S2, for example. With the same lens in the same light condition.

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2016 at 16:57 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: If to compare K-1's AF with Nikon D5/D500 and Canon 1Dx - it's really worse
But is there any sense in such comparison? No.

Nikon 810 is very close to K-1's AF - it depends on lenses, of course.
Some of Pentaxians have the both cameras and found K-1+85/1.4 is even better than D810+85/1.4G.

RS - AF depends on lenses. You're not user of different cameras. It's silly to compare AF of different cameras with different lenses in different conditions.
You can use speed and fast lens on one camera and sluggish and slow lenses on another and make biassed conclusion. It's normal for DPreview. Alas. To compare apples with oranges.

The users has more experience and can be unbiassed.

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2016 at 16:53 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: If to compare K-1's AF with Nikon D5/D500 and Canon 1Dx - it's really worse
But is there any sense in such comparison? No.

Nikon 810 is very close to K-1's AF - it depends on lenses, of course.
Some of Pentaxians have the both cameras and found K-1+85/1.4 is even better than D810+85/1.4G.

RS - Why do you think that your test correct? A lot of K-1's users think that you can't use Pentax cameras at all. You need more practice and the reading of manual about AF-C methods in K-1.

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2016 at 16:47 UTC
Total: 684, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »