ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 613, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1188 comments in total)

Leica S version from Hasselblad without mirror. The system is limited by sensor's size forever. But very compact with really good sensor.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 13:03 UTC as 311th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

ogl: It's just 24/2.8 FF lens analogue in terms of DOF.

Everybody knows that m43 is defective system.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2016 at 10:43 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM DxL - 68.3 x 55.6 mm, 58 mm filter, 281 grams, 550 USD.

This lens is so big and expensive for sensor with crop 2.0x.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2016 at 04:25 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: It's just 24/2.8 FF lens analogue in terms of DOF.

The same light like on FF at f2.8.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2016 at 04:22 UTC

Nikon 24/2.8 DxL - 63.5x45.7 mm, filter 52 mm, 270 grams, 392 USD.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2016 at 04:21 UTC as 139th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

ogl: It's just 24/2.8 FF lens analogue in terms of DOF.

Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM DxL - 68.3 x 55.6 mm, 58 mm filter, 281 grams.
Panasonic 12/1.4 - 70x70 mm, 62 mm filter, 335 grams.

Is it Canon bigger?

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2016 at 04:19 UTC

Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM DxL - 68.3 x 55.6 mm, 58 mm filter, 281 grams, 550 USD.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2016 at 04:14 UTC as 24th comment | 15 replies

It's just 24/2.8 FF lens analogue in terms of DOF.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2016 at 04:05 UTC as 141st comment | 20 replies
In reply to:

Daft Punk: Slow. But small. Makes a nice sunny weather lens. This is a good thing, not a criticism.

It's just 400 USD zoom. First bird in new line of lenses. We will see new fast FF primes soon.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2016 at 06:37 UTC

It's the beginning of new direction of Ricoh. New video directed lenses without screw-drive with fast and noiseless motors.
It's more progressive way than KAF3. Like or not like, but it's right direction with K-mount.

New lens is 8.3 times faster at wide-angle and 1.7 times faster at telephoto end than old 55-300. Don't forget - Ricoh will produce 6 new FF lenses and 4 new APS-C in 2016-2017.
If new FF primes will be made for video mode, silent, speedy and fast with WR or AW, it will be real BIG PROGRESS for Ricoh-Pentax.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2016 at 06:34 UTC as 5th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

eazizisaid: Hey Sony ! Read this

IQ of 55-300 was good for non-expensive zoom

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 02:43 UTC
In reply to:

SungiBr: Well, even the KS-1 will have a firmware update to be compatible with the new lens.
But what about 'not that older' cameras like the K5II? Not that I will buy this lens, but if the new electromagnet diaphragm becomes a standard, this will heaviiy impact retrocompatibility.
For me, the most interesting new feature are that new af system. What is this in real world? Just a fancy name to an in lens af motor or a new and promissing technology that Ricoh developed and will standout over competition?

Also, if they will cut out the aperture lever, why they can't eliminate that old aperture coupler hole on the mount? :/

K-5II is almost 4 years old. Based on much older K-5.

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 02:41 UTC
On article Waterfails: We test Pentax K-1's Pixel Shift (225 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Never used ACR. I don't care about ACR. I'd like to add - they use f16 for tests...To use f16 is useless. The resolution is rather low and the diffraction already started with 36 MP FF camera at such aperture.

Anyway...f16 is no good for resolution tests.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2016 at 15:24 UTC
On article Waterfails: We test Pentax K-1's Pixel Shift (225 comments in total)

Never used ACR. I don't care about ACR. I'd like to add - they use f16 for tests...To use f16 is useless. The resolution is rather low and the diffraction already started with 36 MP FF camera at such aperture.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2016 at 14:13 UTC as 32nd comment | 4 replies
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1092 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Good machine with no good colour. It seems to me the colour is sacrificed to all functions.

Terkwoiz - why do you think that all information has the link in internet? :)

Link | Posted on May 29, 2016 at 13:07 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1092 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Good machine with no good colour. It seems to me the colour is sacrificed to all functions.

I'm not fan of any brand. It's silly. I don't care what is the best or the worst. I just say D500's colours are no good for my eyes.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2016 at 13:05 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1092 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Good machine with no good colour. It seems to me the colour is sacrificed to all functions.

Сolour filter arrays could be ordered by the manufacturer. As well the improvements in microlens could be ordered. There is main version of sensor and there are the revision of sensors. That's why ALL cameras in RAW with the same sensor have different colours. Do you want argue about it? Could be closed, but never be 100% the same.You can't make 100% identical colour from, for example, Nikon and Pentax camera with the same SONY sensor even in converter. K-1 and D810 are different, colour nuances are individual. JPEG engine is another story - it's work of software. If you have a look at DXO information about camera's colour, you can see the difference even in cameras with the same sensor of different camera's makers.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 04:13 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1092 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Good machine with no good colour. It seems to me the colour is sacrificed to all functions.

Colour filters for sensor are different for each camera of different manufacturer. It's fact. It couldn't be fixed by software at 100%. Yes...You can change a lot of settings in RAW converter, but you can't change colour filters. It's forever. My eyes don't like D500's pictures colours. The bleached colours. It looks like somebody is grudge to add blue, green and red...

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 15:23 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1092 comments in total)

Good machine with no good colour. It seems to me the colour is sacrificed to all functions.

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 13:05 UTC as 79th comment | 13 replies

It's was my favourite photo site. Immortal memory to Michael.

Link | Posted on May 19, 2016 at 18:47 UTC as 180th comment
Total: 613, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »