ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 769, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

ogl: As I remember - Samsung denied too, even officially, but it was the truth. The silence withdraw from the market.

Pay attention - Ricoh doesn't refute the information of Nikkei, they give very evasive answer - "This article is not based on RICOH's official announcement".
No any word - wrong or inaccurate information, but placatory words which means almost nothing.
I don't think that Nikkei wrote the article based on fabrication. I think they have insider information.

don't care what you say

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2017 at 16:25 UTC

As I remember - Samsung denied too, even officially, but it was the truth. The silence withdraw from the market.

Pay attention - Ricoh doesn't refute the information of Nikkei, they give very evasive answer - "This article is not based on RICOH's official announcement".
No any word - wrong or inaccurate information, but placatory words which means almost nothing.
I don't think that Nikkei wrote the article based on fabrication. I think they have insider information.

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2017 at 15:14 UTC as 23rd comment | 7 replies

I want to see movie made with such lenses.

Link | Posted on Apr 2, 2017 at 10:39 UTC as 5th comment
On article Pentax KP Review (665 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: K-70 is better than KP at high ISO - 3200, 6400. 6400 is approx. 2/3 stop better.

Leandros S, I mean only 3200 and 6400. As for me, I don't see any sense to use ISO higher than ISO800. KP's junk photo is better than K-70's junk photo at ISO102400 - right.

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2017 at 17:16 UTC

I like FA77/1.8 Limited

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2017 at 15:07 UTC as 19th comment
On article Pentax KP Review (665 comments in total)

K-70 is better than KP at high ISO - 3200, 6400. 6400 is approx. 2/3 stop better.

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2017 at 08:12 UTC as 45th comment | 7 replies
On article Pentax KP Review (665 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: There are a lot of dials and buttons, but no direct control for Shake Reduction. Why?

Tan68, I mean program Fx and RAW buttons with direct SR on/off. Or 3rd dial's mode. No such function in KP.
Press INFO, rotate command dial is not direct access

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2017 at 14:58 UTC
On article Pentax KP Review (665 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: There are a lot of dials and buttons, but no direct control for Shake Reduction. Why?

I've checked manual many times. No any way to make direct control for SR.

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2017 at 14:55 UTC
On article Pentax KP Review (665 comments in total)

There are a lot of dials and buttons, but no direct control for Shake Reduction. Why?

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2017 at 08:34 UTC as 67th comment | 9 replies
On article Fujifilm X100F Review (820 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Ricoh GRIII will be the killer

But GR has sharper images and better lens.

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2017 at 08:05 UTC

Anyway, I see 645Z has wider DR than D810...

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2017 at 16:29 UTC as 348th comment
On article Fujifilm X100F Review (820 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: RAW is useless, JPEG is so-so...IQ is behind the best cameras.

kreislauf, your posts are useless, because you didn't understand the context.

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2017 at 16:26 UTC
On article Fujifilm X100F Review (820 comments in total)

Ricoh GRIII will be the killer

Link | Posted on Mar 20, 2017 at 12:28 UTC as 53rd comment | 14 replies
On article Fujifilm X100F Review (820 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: RAW is useless, JPEG is so-so...IQ is behind the best cameras.

kreislauf, I never use JPEG, man...I've just checked X100F's RAW from DPREVIEW

Link | Posted on Mar 20, 2017 at 12:27 UTC
On article Fujifilm X100F Review (820 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: RAW is useless, JPEG is so-so...IQ is behind the best cameras.

I mean no good IQ in RAW of X100F. It's easy to undestand.

Link | Posted on Mar 20, 2017 at 12:25 UTC
On article Fujifilm X100F Review (820 comments in total)

RAW is useless, JPEG is so-so...IQ is behind the best cameras.

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2017 at 18:20 UTC as 62nd comment | 12 replies
On article Fujifilm GFX 50S Review: Modern MF (917 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: The level of details of 50 MP Fuji and Pentax is a bit higher than EOS 5DS R. Not much, but there is some small difference.

MF has lower noise

Link | Posted on Mar 14, 2017 at 17:51 UTC
On article Fujifilm GFX 50S Review: Modern MF (917 comments in total)

The level of details of 50 MP Fuji and Pentax is a bit higher than EOS 5DS R. Not much, but there is some small difference.

Link | Posted on Mar 14, 2017 at 12:36 UTC as 159th comment | 8 replies

No sky...DR is not as good as it could be?

Link | Posted on Mar 9, 2017 at 12:47 UTC as 105th comment | 1 reply

Not fast for 44*33 mm sensor

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2017 at 11:14 UTC as 1st comment
Total: 769, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »