ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 814, showing: 281 – 300
« First‹ Previous1314151617Next ›Last »
On article Fujifilm X70 Review (377 comments in total)

The lens is the main part of the camera. If there is no sharpness at all, how to use such camera?

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2016 at 04:54 UTC as 70th comment | 15 replies
On a photo in the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III Real-world Samples Gallery sample gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: P&S camera's IQ.

Lower than 1 stop in terms of noise. But I say about IQ.

http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX100-IV-versus-Pentax-MX-1___1033_854

Sony's ISO400 is real ISO301, screen SNR18% -28.7 dB, ISO400 of MX-1 is real ISO356, SNR18% - 25.9 dB. Sony has the same SNR18% at ISO800 (real ISO597). It means the difference of SN is the diffrence between real ISO597 and ISO356. It's lower than 1 stop.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2016 at 11:15 UTC
On a photo in the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III Real-world Samples Gallery sample gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: P&S camera's IQ.

I hope that 1" sensor is better than 1/1.7"...But it's very close. Maybe JPEG from RAW could be better?

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 19:05 UTC
On a photo in the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III Real-world Samples Gallery sample gallery (5 comments in total)

P&S camera's IQ.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 17:05 UTC as 1st comment | 4 replies

As for me 12800 is the limit

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2016 at 16:29 UTC as 94th comment
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2160 comments in total)

A6000 has sharper pictures

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2016 at 05:30 UTC as 357th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

ogl: Who are the buyers of this system...?

Nothing is wrong, it should be the necessity to buy

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 12:50 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: Who are the buyers of this system...?

My friends with money use smart-phones to take pictures :)))

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 07:05 UTC

Who are the buyers of this system...?

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 06:17 UTC as 59th comment | 11 replies
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2498 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: I see Nikon D5500 beats Fuji in terms of noise...

The problem that we don't know if Fuji's ISO6400 is real ISO...:) Fujifilm X100's marked ISO6400 is real 1076...
http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Fujifilm/FinePix-X100---Measurements

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 15:09 UTC
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2498 comments in total)

I see Nikon D5500 beats Fuji in terms of noise...

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 05:39 UTC as 131st comment | 3 replies
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2498 comments in total)

1700 USD for APS-C camera when there are FF cameras from 1200 tilll 1900 USD....

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 05:36 UTC as 132nd comment | 3 replies
On article Canon announces budget-friendly EOS Rebel T6 (1300D) (872 comments in total)

For what?

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2016 at 07:00 UTC as 66th comment
On article Great Eight: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review (549 comments in total)

subject tracking is failed.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2016 at 16:25 UTC as 145th comment
On article Great Eight: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review (549 comments in total)

I would say that no any good photos from 16 samples in continuous shooting...

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2016 at 16:23 UTC as 146th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ogl: Quattro H is compatible with Sigma FF lenses only

It's said in Sigma's official data sheets. APS-H camera is compatible with FF Sigma lenses, APS-C with APS-C lenses.

Easy to understand such simple fact. No any mask or APS-C mode for APS-H camera. Sigma OFFERS two different solutions.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 11:37 UTC

Quattro H is compatible with Sigma FF lenses only

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 21:05 UTC as 142nd comment | 3 replies

Foveon Cmos 26,6 x 17,9 mm Foveon X3 Quattro. 25 MP = 45 MP Bayer eq.
Foveon Cmos 23,5 x 15,5 mm Foveon X3 Quattro, 20 MP = 29 MP Bayer eq.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 21:04 UTC as 143rd comment
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (609 comments in total)
In reply to:

ronniemac: Barney, that is one excellent article. Thanks for putting it together.

Like you I do worry about the cost of the best new zooms, but hey, it will be less than a 645z with its new lenses. Is it worth mentioning that, when I last counted, Pentax currently offers 22 full frame lenses, some are FA, some F DA, and quite a few primes are DA which may require stopping down although I have seen evidence to the contrary. Granted that a few of these are not yet in the shops, but I live in hope. Hopefully Sigma, Tamron, Samyang etc will help out, although it will only be if there is financial benefit.

Like you, I started out with an MX. You must have bought an old one as surely you're much younger than that! I still enjoy the K-3 II but Pentax seem to have identified their target market correctly. Although not at the front of the Q (pun), I will indulge myself with a K-1. For Pentax's sake, I hope others do also. Lots of old glass to have fun with too.

Thanks again, nice article.

http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2006/02/17/3233.html please, here is info. :)

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 20:00 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (609 comments in total)
In reply to:

ronniemac: Barney, that is one excellent article. Thanks for putting it together.

Like you I do worry about the cost of the best new zooms, but hey, it will be less than a 645z with its new lenses. Is it worth mentioning that, when I last counted, Pentax currently offers 22 full frame lenses, some are FA, some F DA, and quite a few primes are DA which may require stopping down although I have seen evidence to the contrary. Granted that a few of these are not yet in the shops, but I live in hope. Hopefully Sigma, Tamron, Samyang etc will help out, although it will only be if there is financial benefit.

Like you, I started out with an MX. You must have bought an old one as surely you're much younger than that! I still enjoy the K-3 II but Pentax seem to have identified their target market correctly. Although not at the front of the Q (pun), I will indulge myself with a K-1. For Pentax's sake, I hope others do also. Lots of old glass to have fun with too.

Thanks again, nice article.

By the way, first Pentax FF digital camera had name K-1 too. http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/static/image/2006/02/17/k101l.jpg
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/static/image/2006/02/17/pentax1_02l.jpg
https://c1.staticflickr.com/7/6137/5943421002_520c9f447e.jpg

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 19:56 UTC
Total: 814, showing: 281 – 300
« First‹ Previous1314151617Next ›Last »