ogl

ogl

Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 795, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

ogl: 200 USD is good price for such lens.

IQ is for 200USD. Not above. They could use optical plastics.

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2017 at 13:49 UTC

200 USD is good price for such lens.

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2017 at 07:58 UTC as 11th comment | 2 replies
On article These are the 15 most popular Flickr photos of 2017 (208 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: just pieces of junk...mass culture spirit with heavy PP...derivative and artificial
but many people like it...

I tell about the art taste's direction. About basic tendency.

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2017 at 11:47 UTC

The main question from me is WHEN ZINK technology became cheaper and I can print my photos with A4 and A3 with ZINK printer. I want to leave some prints for my issue :)

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2017 at 17:45 UTC as 2nd comment
On article These are the 15 most popular Flickr photos of 2017 (208 comments in total)
In reply to:

runbei99: Very happy to see that Elena Shumilova made the cut - her photos of her children on a farm in Russia are stunning. See http://www.boredpanda.com/animal-children-photography-elena-shumilova/. She shoots with a Canon 6D and the amazing 135mm F/2.

I find Flickr a tremendous resources for evaluating prospective camera and lens purchases. (Why do so many Fuji X-Pro2 photos look slightly soft - weird!)

Elena Shumilova is the best example of making a lot of false photos in glamour style. She exploits her children to earn money. She works till 4 hours with post-processing of ONE photo and makes it absolutely unreal. Her photos are more hard-headed than artistic.

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2017 at 17:40 UTC
On article These are the 15 most popular Flickr photos of 2017 (208 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: just pieces of junk...mass culture spirit with heavy PP...derivative and artificial
but many people like it...

I dare to say and write absolutely everything that I find necessary and correct, in the very form that I personally find appropriate, not asking anyone for permission, the highest approval, or moral blessing. If I don't like the film or theatre performance, would you ask me to show my staging? If I don't like the dish in restaurant, would you ask me to show my cooking?

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2017 at 17:30 UTC
On article These are the 15 most popular Flickr photos of 2017 (208 comments in total)

just pieces of junk...mass culture spirit with heavy PP...derivative and artificial
but many people like it...

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2017 at 17:13 UTC as 60th comment | 12 replies
In reply to:

Ebrahim Saadawi: 2500$ for a (Very) compact 75/1.9 Medium format lens, perhaps is a good deal if it's decent. For FF, it's acceptable. For APS-C and M43s and S16/1", no way. Just get a freaking 85/1.8 with VC if you want.

MF performance is key here.

The price could be 650-800...

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2017 at 16:34 UTC

A bit strange method of comparison and time to publish...The difference in portrait 0.2 points, in landscape 0.1, high ISO of 645Z is 16 points better...102 vs 101...50 Mp vs 51.4 Mp

and...the camera is 3 year and 7 months old....:)

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2017 at 16:11 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

pro photo 2011: So for $1,699, you can buy the Panasonic G9 body only, or you can buy the Sony RX10 IV with a 24-600mm Zeiss lens and it has phase detection autofocus that shoots up to 24 fps. Okay, so the Sony has a 1-inch sensor, while the Panny G9 has a M43 sensor.

Video specs of Pana is very cool.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 14:55 UTC

Good camera for video, first of all.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 14:54 UTC as 121st comment
On article Leica Thambar-M 90mm F2.2 sample gallery (214 comments in total)

Helios 44M is very-very cheap and could more

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2017 at 16:22 UTC as 76th comment
In reply to:

ogl: Is there any RAW converter to work with this camera? Or it shoots in DNG?

It was before. Old versions didn't support DNG. Capture One works with DNG for a long time and rather good.

Link | Posted on Nov 3, 2017 at 08:05 UTC

Is there any RAW converter to work with this camera? Or it shoots in DNG?

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2017 at 05:00 UTC as 22nd comment | 4 replies

How to see 0.15 difference by human eye?

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2017 at 04:58 UTC as 13th comment
On article First samples: Leica Thambar-M 90mm F2.2 (223 comments in total)

It's rather strange trend to produce lenses with low contrast and very weak resolution...Somebody love it, of course...But I don't understand it.

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2017 at 06:10 UTC as 75th comment
In reply to:

borax: Am I right ?
Sigma sells an excellent 50mm f/1.4 for 800$ witch is FF designed.
Zuiko produces a probably excellent too 45mm f/1.2 for much smaller sensors M43. But sells it 50% more expensive ?

Oly makes it to make money, first of all...

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2017 at 08:46 UTC
In reply to:

borax: Am I right ?
Sigma sells an excellent 50mm f/1.4 for 800$ witch is FF designed.
Zuiko produces a probably excellent too 45mm f/1.2 for much smaller sensors M43. But sells it 50% more expensive ?

it's very hard work to produce lens for crop 2.0x sensor :)

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2017 at 16:25 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: 90/2.4 FF equiv. for 1200 USD and 34/2.4 for 1500 USD....
If 45/1.2 is good and the price is not really high.
BUT....17/1.2 is really expensive and it's not 35/2 or 35/1.4 for DSLR...

Jorginho, fan's mantra and nothing else...DOF of 45/1.2 at m4/3 is the same as 90/2.4 at FF. It's simple. I't's not my opinion. It's FACT. 45/1.2 is made not for any system, but for small crop 2.0x sensor. It performs rather ordinary.

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2017 at 16:24 UTC
In reply to:

Kirk Bruner: The 11-18 looks like the same re-branded lens sold by Sony. I used to have one. Nice.

How to make 4.5-5.6 as 2.8? It should be another optical design....

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2017 at 04:08 UTC
Total: 795, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »