Joined on Apr 20, 2013


Total: 909, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Review (1025 comments in total)
In reply to:

jb89100: You forget a big "pro" in your review, which I often use with the GH5, the 6k photo function, much more convenient than any burst mode, especially using the joystick. 2mn of 6k photo equals a burst of 3600 photos and is sorted in a few seconds in the camera. Huge saving of time in post processing and disk space, and with an excellent IQ. Huge advantage vs EM1II. This feature alone deserves a gold award imo.

interesting use of the camera...

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2018 at 09:00 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S Review (589 comments in total)
In reply to:

Archiver: The GH5s looks like an intriguing stills camera, too. The high ISO capabilities, plus 14 bit raw, should make for quite the night time camera. And the multi aspect ratio sensor will turn a 24mm equivalent lens in 4:3 into something more like 22mm in 16:9, if the LX7 and GH2 were anything to go by.

I disagree. having higher bitrate raw file does not translate into a better high ISO results. the dual ISO will improve things a bit but having an FF or even APS-C camera will perform much better at night shootings.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2018 at 12:49 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S Review (589 comments in total)
In reply to:

M Chambers: God forbid using an actual $2,000 prosumer camcorder with lux to shoot in low light conditions.

well... there has to be one. , I am sure there are better option and the GH5s stinks because only fanboys are pushing this.
also, i don't know anything about videography and I am only using the comment section because it is anonymous.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2018 at 12:44 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S Review (589 comments in total)
In reply to:

John Koch: Might the "intended users" of the GH5s include people who currently use the (5-axis IBIS equipped) a7sii? Let them be the ones to do the tests, comparisons, and assessments.

As for anyone else, who would ever give up IBIS, only for the sake of higher usable ISO, and for $500 more, yet still have the same lame AF? Better to keep the IBIS and get a faster lens to aid low light results. A mere $500 will buy a 4k LX100 with an f/1.7 24mm equivalent lens.

Alas, it seems there will be no (dust sealed, BSI sensor, 5-axis IBIS) LX200.

if your needs are satisfied with a LX100, please go ahead.
many other people are super happy about the new GH5s.
And if you ask nicely, we can tell you why the GH5s is such a bargain and we will even provide you with some basic reading on videography so that you can educate yourself properly.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2018 at 12:39 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S Review (589 comments in total)
In reply to:

kevin_r: Interesting how a stills camera is being morphed into a video camera. Why not simply go and buy a complete video camera to do the job? Why hang around these things hoping they'll give all the functionality of a video camera and then want to so,so occasionally take some stills? Don't talk about price since people are demanding the actual real functionality available in the video cams - but want to pay nothing for it. Go figure.

what are you talking about?
the GH4 already was awesome for low-budget productions, whith the GH5 and GH5s, you have amazing cameras available.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2018 at 12:37 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S Review (589 comments in total)
In reply to:

MaxFury: I was actually going to buy this until they dropped the no IBIS bomb. :(

missing IBIS is a good thing! in semi-professional settings, you often have gimbals, slides or other tools to control camera motion.
having IBIS would have made other things worse, think of cooling and the general size of the camera

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2018 at 12:36 UTC

wow, 3500g?

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2018 at 12:28 UTC as 60th comment | 1 reply
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Review (1025 comments in total)
In reply to:

108: For a little 4/3 format I find the result pretty good , AF and IQ . Some complain of the noise at 3200 iso but just downsample to 3400 , roughly enough for an A4 print , and add a little denoise , now that wouldn't pass the test for a half-page in a College paper or an internet newsletter ??

it would. especially for low-quality print (not those 600dpi glossy safari art pieces for your living rooms)

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2018 at 13:35 UTC
In reply to:

mgm2: So who can afford this stuff?

those, for whom these lenses are made for?

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2018 at 13:32 UTC
On article Why you should own a 135mm F2 lens (385 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chev Chelios: OK, I'll light the touch paper...

Wouldn't it be more accurate to title the article:

"Why you should own a 135mm F2 lens if you have a full frame dSLR" or even

"Why you should own an equivalent 135mm F2 lens" ?

no, because he spoke about the lens design and ment a 135mm lens design. not an equivalent 135mm
sorry if you have a mirrorless with a cropfactor of 1.5 or even longer.

Link | Posted on Jan 2, 2018 at 18:23 UTC

man these camera is not for the faint hearted when it comes to noise...

Link | Posted on Jan 1, 2018 at 19:30 UTC as 33rd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

adengappasami: Way better than GIMP. Very detailed some of the adjustments to an extent that it is way detailed.

Lightroom is simple, easy and quick for fast turn around.

This looks hybrid of Lightroom and a bit of photoshop. Looks very promising.

"Lightroom is ... quick "
mine isn't

Link | Posted on Dec 28, 2017 at 13:21 UTC
In reply to:

Raist3d: Yes. The Camera will now be Stolen Camera TV Store Edition™️ Even more $$$$$

jesus what is wrong with you?
envy clogged your brain?

Link | Posted on Dec 27, 2017 at 13:49 UTC
On article 2017 in review: a look back at February (81 comments in total)

revive the Nikon 1 line already...

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2017 at 19:49 UTC as 14th comment
In reply to:

Gmon750: Um... okay... did this camera store have any "surveillance cameras" in use? Would be very ironic (and irresponsible) if they didn't.

hobby detectives, are we?
you are hired to solve the case!

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2017 at 21:31 UTC
In reply to:

Bobthearch: Around here the crackheads would have already sold it to their dealer for $40 worth of junk.
In this case though, targeting Leica and Hasselblad products, it's probably not street addicts.

you are sharp as a razor, sir

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2017 at 21:29 UTC
In reply to:

tim fisher46: I own the Nikon D800 plus an array of f1.4, f1.8 primes and the three 17 to 200 f2.8 professional zooms, I own the Sony a7R and the Leica M240 (same chip as the M10), and I can tell you with Leica lenses in front of this sensor, be prepared to be dazzled.

28mm - f2.8, 35mm - f1.4, 50mm- f1.4 and 90 f2 all 6 bit the most up to date modern digital lenses.

ahm. congratulations I guess?

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2017 at 19:34 UTC
In reply to:

Ashkanani: I am really disappointed on you guys dpreview editors!
Saying that full frame Leica match crop sensor on big subject is really insulting for Leica and shouldn’t be done this way !
You didnt say the same on 1dx mark ii and nikon D5 sensor where both camera according to DXO match crop sensor of D7200 and samsung ?!

Really not nice as it been presented as insult only to a specific product!

jesus, somebody seems cranky today...

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2017 at 19:32 UTC
On article Have your say: Best prime lens of 2017 (60 comments in total)
In reply to:

User7036222305: the selection vote is missing: Panasonic Leica DG Elmarit 200mm F2.8 Power OIS

that is a monster lens. never figured out why one need that lens though

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2017 at 12:14 UTC
In reply to:

Snapper2013: Falling from 62 stories must've made one helluva big splat! lol

well, it most certainly was breathtaking

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2017 at 09:00 UTC
Total: 909, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »