kreislauf

kreislauf

Joined on Apr 20, 2013

Comments

Total: 384, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

BBQue: Fuji makes some interesting niche products....

Like the instax cameras?

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 21:02 UTC
In reply to:

photo_rb: I love the idea of manufacturers building larger sensor cameras but on the flip side, the increasing quality of smaller than FF sensors is also great to see. What a nice time to be a photographer.

Exactly. Now we have fully automated high-tech point and shoot cameras for enthusiasts that are so fixated on how many milliseconds the af needs...

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 20:59 UTC
In reply to:

Thermidor: I've never worked with medium format before. Just wondering, aside from depth of field, how does it change things for someone shooting APS-C or full frame, and what are the drawbacks of the format (aside from camera bulk and cost)? Besides portraiture, product/architecture and landscape, what other forms of photography would benefit from the jump to medium format?

Disclaimer: I would never buy the GFX/M10/anything photo related for this amount of money.

still, I wonder what happens when you compare lets say a Pentax K1 with the GFX and process them right. For good light photography, I would expect only forensic differences viewed at normal print size.
Same would be true for the new X-Trans III sensor. I would love to see the differences in real life.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 12:13 UTC
In reply to:

zeratulmrye: The product that actually changed my view about medium format is Hasselblad X1D... So slim, so sexy.

Mine too. It us so expensive..

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 11:13 UTC

Mmh, loxia, now this, the sony line is getting more and more interesting

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 08:55 UTC as 22nd comment | 1 reply
On article CP+ 2017: Hands-on with Sigma's newest lenses (188 comments in total)
In reply to:

Flashback: If you have a minute Sigma, could you knock up some E-mount versions?
Don't bother with the stabilisation, if that helps!

amusing...

A6000 is a steal! Lens choices for (F)E-mount are amazing! some are expensive, some are not.

only smaller sensors give you a weight benefit on glass. Sensor-area demands glass area. If you want 135, you need to carry 135 lenses. The right punishment for all the area-junkies!

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 23:00 UTC
On article CP+ 2017: Hands-on with Sigma's newest lenses (188 comments in total)
In reply to:

mferencz: That thing is HUUUUUGE. Jeezus, seriously, it better bring the Andromeda galaxy in up close.

nah, hands are small,
arms are heavy.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 22:56 UTC
On article CP+ 2017: Hands-on with Sigma's newest lenses (188 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sacher Khoudari: When is Sigma going to bring out lenses for Fuji's X-Mount? I'd be glad to have the 18-35/1.8 for my Fuji!

uhm, adapters?

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 22:54 UTC
On article CP+ 2017: Hands-on with Sigma's newest lenses (188 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kevin DiOssi: When did photographers get so dainty? I can't believe how many people complain about the size and weight of lense like this, which were designed for holding nothing back in the department of image quality. Comparing them to a Zeiss, which is only manual focus, these lenses are comparable in size and they are autofocus.

If you're a serious pro, there's probably a good chance you own a 70-200 f/2.8 lens. This lens is smaller and lighter than those lenses...so stop. Haha

that's a new one for me that people are actually asking for HEAVIER gear.
Arnold, is that you?

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 22:52 UTC
In reply to:

TheRealYeats: The pic of the K-1 looks odd.

The whole camera looks odd!

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2017 at 20:43 UTC
On article Leica SL Review (750 comments in total)

Wow. Waiting for the X100F review. Suddenly a wild Leica SL review appears. Fun read.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2017 at 15:04 UTC as 159th comment
On article First Look: Fujinon MK18-55mm T2.9 cine lens (64 comments in total)
In reply to:

OlyPent: Unlike Schneider or Zeiss, Fuji won't be trying to sell these cine lenses to the still's camera shooters. But, wouldn't it be interesting to see how it would compare to "kit" lenses?

Thanks, no one here had a clue... Video you say? As in youtube?

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2017 at 14:59 UTC
On article First Look: Fujinon MK18-55mm T2.9 cine lens (64 comments in total)
In reply to:

PowerG9atBlackForest: Ha, ha! #3 shows that the lens' focus can be adjusted to a distance in m and another in ft. How's that? Another fake?

for simple folks like me, you need to make your humor a bit more accessible. or least distribute print-outs of your advanced sarcasm. So that we are able to catch up with you...

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2017 at 10:42 UTC
On article First Look: Fujinon MK18-55mm T2.9 cine lens (64 comments in total)
In reply to:

OlyPent: Unlike Schneider or Zeiss, Fuji won't be trying to sell these cine lenses to the still's camera shooters. But, wouldn't it be interesting to see how it would compare to "kit" lenses?

Well the price is one thing.
The physical dimension are something else.
Could you imagine somebody, swapping his 18-55mm kit lens with this - ahm - rocket?

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2017 at 08:54 UTC
On article iPhone 8 front camera rumored to capture 3D images (75 comments in total)
In reply to:

kreislauf: common, where is the X100F review?

Ah snap, i didn't think about that

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2017 at 08:51 UTC
On article First Look: Fujinon MK18-55mm T2.9 cine lens (64 comments in total)
In reply to:

PowerG9atBlackForest: Ha, ha! #3 shows that the lens' focus can be adjusted to a distance in m and another in ft. How's that? Another fake?

No genius.
Less likely that this is a fake could be the explanation, that the focus ring simply has 2 scales. Metric left and imperial on the right. White marks bar marks on both sides are static.
But of course you can be right and spotted the error of the failing fake-news media here all on yourself! Bravo.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2017 at 08:46 UTC
On article iPhone 8 front camera rumored to capture 3D images (75 comments in total)

common, where is the X100F review?

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2017 at 19:33 UTC as 19th comment | 2 replies
On article Sony Alpha 7R II: Real-world ISO invariance study (371 comments in total)
In reply to:

DesertWanderer: I'm not getting the same results with my A7RII using uncompressed RAW and firmware v3. The base ISO photos that are that underexposed look MUCH worse than the example above. I have no idea why, but my Sony does not appear to be ISO invariant. The higher ISOs have much less noise than the base ISO adjusted for brightness or exposure in post. Bummer.

Shading compensation is off?

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 17:55 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2189 comments in total)
In reply to:

Eugene CH: What a Pity! Neither Fuji X-T2 and X-T1 nor most of Fujinon lenses have image stabilization!

I don't find it too useful. In my shooting, I get soft images because the subjects move. I am comfortable with a 1/50 of a second, but mostly i set my camera to 1/60th-1/125th and dial in the rest as I see fit.
Image stabilization is a fine thing to squeeze out one or two stops on better ISO noise in the dark on static objects.

It's another feature and you have to decide if it is worth it. For Fujis approach, I like seeing it being ignored. The Fuji appeal is: keep it simple! and how I like that.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2017 at 20:17 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: the Nikon D80 (241 comments in total)
In reply to:

great Javier: My first serious camera is the sony rx100 ^^.

wanna tell us about your first car as well?

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2017 at 10:21 UTC
Total: 384, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »