HeyItsJoel

HeyItsJoel

Lives in United States California, United States
Joined on Mar 6, 2006

Comments

Total: 390, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2602 comments in total)

$$ Sony A9 body only = Nikon D810 + 24-70 f2.8 $$

Hmmm... no contest.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2017 at 22:38 UTC as 26th comment | 2 replies
On article Now we know: Sony a9 is sharper than we thought (263 comments in total)

The studio scene comparison confirmed the superiority of the Nikon D810.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2017 at 22:19 UTC as 33rd comment | 2 replies

meh.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2017 at 15:25 UTC as 13th comment

Not fair posting a picture of a pretty blonde to sway the viewer's impressions of the lens. :)

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2017 at 15:52 UTC as 5th comment
On article Video: Nikon D7500 first look (416 comments in total)
In reply to:

HeyItsJoel: Go D500 or go home.

Nah. There is such a thing as the law of diminishing returns. I am just a hobbyist and have little reason to go D5.

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2017 at 23:21 UTC
In reply to:

stromaroma: Why didn't they use a hasselblad like last time they went to the moon? Oh wait, they didn't go to the moon, it was a hoax!

Because the internetz told him that the moon landings were fake. That's how he know for sure!

Did you also know that when you're sick, you can type in your symptoms and get diagnosed with a disease by someone online?! True story.

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2017 at 15:57 UTC
On article Shiftcam for iPhone 7 Plus review (58 comments in total)

A what cam?! Ooooooh, a shiFtcam! My bad.

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2017 at 15:49 UTC as 23rd comment | 1 reply
On article Video: Nikon D7500 first look (416 comments in total)
In reply to:

HeyItsJoel: Go D500 or go home.

@Dante: by all means, aspire to lower standards.

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2017 at 15:42 UTC
On article Video: Nikon D7500 first look (416 comments in total)

Go D500 or go home.

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2017 at 15:04 UTC as 14th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

HeyItsJoel: 28mm and 50mm are the two most useless prime lenses for me.

If someone gave me even the f1.8 versions for free, I'd turn around and sell it.

Next time, put a smilie face at the end of your jest. :)

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 23:23 UTC
In reply to:

HeyItsJoel: 28mm and 50mm are the two most useless prime lenses for me.

If someone gave me even the f1.8 versions for free, I'd turn around and sell it.

"Maybe you should find larger museums."

Maybe you should find a better plastic surgeon.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 16:24 UTC
In reply to:

HeyItsJoel: 28mm and 50mm are the two most useless prime lenses for me.

If someone gave me even the f1.8 versions for free, I'd turn around and sell it.

You're welcome. Just thought I'd put that out there because I know that people like Morvegil has their entire world revolve around mine. Their's wouldn't make sense otherwise.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2017 at 19:19 UTC
In reply to:

HeyItsJoel: 28mm and 50mm are the two most useless prime lenses for me.

If someone gave me even the f1.8 versions for free, I'd turn around and sell it.

I found the 28mm didn't help in the tight quarters of museums in Europe.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2017 at 15:41 UTC

VR. lol.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2017 at 15:22 UTC as 40th comment | 1 reply

meh.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2017 at 15:21 UTC as 10th comment | 1 reply

28mm and 50mm are the two most useless prime lenses for me.

If someone gave me even the f1.8 versions for free, I'd turn around and sell it.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2017 at 15:19 UTC as 15th comment | 10 replies
On article Nikon D3: The camera that changed everything (279 comments in total)

No, no. The invention of the wheel changed EVERYTHING. Nikon D3's contribution fails in epic proportions.

Link | Posted on May 25, 2017 at 16:03 UTC as 84th comment
In reply to:

Donnie G: Just for fun, let's pretend that Canon does introduce a FF mirrorless camera next year. If such a camera were to become available, my guess is that it would take EF lenses natively and that Canon would position it above the 6D-2, but below the 5D IV. In other words, around $2800 USD, body only. How many rabid mirrorless fans would actually be willing to cough up the dough? Yes, it would include all of your favorite buzz words, EVF, 2 SD slots, 4k video, silent mode, etc.. 😎

Paging Donnie G.... your unicorn is ready for pickup.

Link | Posted on May 24, 2017 at 15:27 UTC

It's ALLLIIIIIIVE!!!

Link | Posted on May 24, 2017 at 15:24 UTC as 12th comment

They've made the switch to digital, they can make the switch to mirrorless. Seems the majority of the people left who believe in mirrored bodies are professionals, with good reason. But the cash-cow herd is going the way of the mirrorless. Adjust or eat the dust of Fuji, Sony, Olympus and Panasonic as they trample over your market share. Hell, even Apple's got your number! Your move, Canon/Nikon.

Link | Posted on May 23, 2017 at 16:05 UTC as 105th comment
Total: 390, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »