shuttrrbug

Lives in United States Los Angeles, CA, United States
Joined on Jul 17, 2007

Comments

Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR sample gallery (284 comments in total)
In reply to:

great Javier: So, you pay an expensive camera and an expensive lens to have soft images. And Fujifilm says that they don't want to implement IBIS because they would lose IQ.... yeah....

Hi Rishi,

Photo number 5, for example, has the focus on the mother's arm at the wrist.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2017 at 03:47 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR sample gallery (284 comments in total)
In reply to:

Artem Holstov: I have been a fuji user for the last 3 years. In my personal experience, absolute most of their lenses are excuisite and above competition in IQ. But this one.. sorry, it is a miss for me. 23mm is a supposed to be a general purpose lens, but (based on sample photos) with such softness at close distances when wide open, it is not a very good one at that.

Consider user error for soft images.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 23:01 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR sample gallery (284 comments in total)
In reply to:

great Javier: So, you pay an expensive camera and an expensive lens to have soft images. And Fujifilm says that they don't want to implement IBIS because they would lose IQ.... yeah....

Don't discount user error which may be blamed here for soft images. I have the fuji 35 f/2 and it is sharp. On some of these samples, the focus is off.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 23:00 UTC
On article 2016 Holiday Gift Guide: up to $100 (31 comments in total)

Nice selection

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2016 at 05:14 UTC as 4th comment

Gee, this has been available for free on the net for quite some time now.

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2011 at 18:26 UTC as 31st comment
On photo Ant-Mimicking Jumping Spider in the Spiders challenge (2 comments in total)

Congrats!

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2011 at 00:04 UTC as 2nd comment
On photo Duesy Tubes in the Close-ups/Macros of Classic Cars-Read the Rules challenge (2 comments in total)

Well done. Congrats!

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2011 at 00:03 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On Challenge:5367 (22 comments in total)

Hello,

Thanks everyone for your entries especially the ones that were falsely disqualified by me, and thanks for your comments. I am VERY sorry about the confusion. It is my fault as I was confused on my own rules and disqualified some of your photos which were PERFECTLY within my own established rules :(. I meant to create a challenge for cars built 1960s and later, but I screwed up. This explains why when I disqualified some of you, I was thinking of cars built later than 1960s :( I should have come up with a better statement do describe the rule!

I now have re-qualified ALL of you. Good luck with this challenge series and again thank you. Sorry for not responding to your concerns earlier as I was away and did not have access to internet.

If there's anything I can do to make it up to you, please let me know!

Regards,

Posted on Oct 6, 2011 at 03:45 UTC as 4th comment
On photo Old Yeller in the Close-ups/Macros of Classic Cars-Read the Rules challenge (1 comment in total)

Your entry does not qualify. The car must be built no later than 60s. Read the rules please.

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2011 at 21:06 UTC as 1st comment

I refer you to this quote from the rules which clearly states: "built no later than 60s."

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2011 at 21:02 UTC as 1st comment
On photo BMW Classic in the Close-ups/Macros of Classic Cars-Read the Rules challenge (2 comments in total)

Is this a pre-60s model? If so delete it. Please read the rules.

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2011 at 01:11 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On photo Red jag in the Close-ups/Macros of Classic Cars-Read the Rules challenge (2 comments in total)

Is this a pre-60s model? If so please delete. Read the rules.

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2011 at 01:05 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On photo An Old Austin Car in the Close-ups/Macros of Classic Cars-Read the Rules challenge (2 comments in total)

Is this a pre-60's model? If so please delete. Read the rules please.

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2011 at 01:03 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On photo Mercedes in the Close-ups/Macros of Classic Cars-Read the Rules challenge (1 comment in total)

No pre-60s models. please read the rules.

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2011 at 01:01 UTC as 1st comment
On photo DSC_0315_edited-1 in the Close-ups/Macros of Classic Cars-Read the Rules challenge (1 comment in total)

No pre-60's models. PLease read the rules.

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2011 at 00:58 UTC as 1st comment

Where is the second part of this article?

Link | Posted on Oct 2, 2011 at 18:43 UTC as 11th comment

Where is the second part of this article?

Link | Posted on Oct 2, 2011 at 18:43 UTC as 12th comment
On photo The Fodder Man Comes Out in the People coming out challenge (4 comments in total)

Hilarious!

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2011 at 01:00 UTC as 3rd comment
On photo DSC_0981 in the At the Beach 2011 challenge (4 comments in total)

This is awesome!

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2011 at 15:02 UTC as 3rd comment
On photo Legs to die for! in the Body Show Off challenge (15 comments in total)

Mmmmm....<---- leg man here :)

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2011 at 13:53 UTC as 11th comment
Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »