Julian

There was a post on Nikon Rumors yesterday saying that setting the camera to flight mode can give you up to 5500 shots on one charge, so I switched my Z6 to flight mode, but not had a chance to...

Seems like less distortion than the 14-24 though.

I agree I also like lightweight kit, in this regard though the new 24-70S is almost like a set of primes in terms of sharpness at least, and it really is not a bit lens, or a heavy one.

You can have IBIS or VR independently on the Zs (I own a Z6).
So one can be on and the other off, or vica versa, as VR is implemented in the lens and IBIS in the body, and they work totally...

They've stated in a previous press release from last year that it is a tech they have been working on for years, just not one they thought compatible with their DSLRs and so they withheld it.

Well I certainly welcome it, and hope that it continues forever, it can only win over customers.

thats how I read it too, both cameras have good IBIS at about the same levels.

Not me, I ordered and got a Z6, and now additionally happy with the above press release, but to be honest the Z6 is a great camera even on the base firmware.

Personally I see absence of powerzoom as a plus point.

you mean the one that only shows up if you miss your exposure by 6 stops or more? they didnt mention any corrections in the announcement, but usually these are included too, so I think its entirely...

My experience with Lee filters are they are top quality, so not sure how you reach the conclusion they are garbage, perhaps you went for a low cost line or something...?

As a non-retired software engineer, everythings a feature these days, there are no bugs, its called Agile...

I have the 14-24 f/2.8 and the Lee filter adapter for it - and whilst that is an awesome combination, it would be good to get something lighter-weight and more compatible with standard filters. I'm...

From a quality and convenience point of view - the 24-70 f4 really wins in my view.

Nope - no review on DXO for any of the Z lenses yet, and it looks like they are not really doing lens reviews much these days - last review was feb last year... looks like they are focussed on...

I can say that the 24-70 S lens is really very good for glare, shooting straight into the sun, I cannot find any glare at all, and that is a first for any lens I have ever used. I suspect this is...

I'd like an 80-300 f4.

they are all S lenses and so for Z mount, the ones marked NIKKOR Z are currently released (think the 14-30 is released with CES).

It's kind of funny, but when these cameras were first released we had Sony trolls posting that they could/would never fix the autofocus problems in firmware, and now that Nikon have announced that...

I actually like the XQD decision, the transfer of my Z6 files is bloody fast now, and likely only to get faster with CFExpress promissed on the horizon now.