Mssimo

Mssimo

Lives in United States Minneapolis, MN, United States
Works as a Software Analyst
Has a website at www.10000photography.com
Joined on Jun 6, 2009

Comments

Total: 1018, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On article Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 ED VR real-world sample gallery (112 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mssimo: Will high resolution cameras (think 60-120MP full frame) kill zoom lenses?

@androole Im not sure if you understand where I was going with the topic. Because of the bayer filter, its "impossible" for the lens to archive the full resolution of the sensor. Using those numbers it seems the best lenses can get to around 8-10% of the total sensor resolution.

I guess we dont know what the future holds, are we going to end the megapixel race around 60mp, 75 or 100+? At some point we cant overcome physics. Back to my main point, a zoom lens design with todays technology is already at the limit of resolution. Todays 24-70 may be as good as it gets.

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 15:26 UTC
On article Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 ED VR real-world sample gallery (112 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mssimo: Will high resolution cameras (think 60-120MP full frame) kill zoom lenses?

A theretical perfect lens is sharpest wide open. Not only that, the more dense pixels become, the more apperant diffraction becomes. In todays world of 36-51MP cameras, peak sharpness is around f4-f5.6. Next gen sensors will require lenses to have peak performance under f4 and soon after, f2.8 and even f1.4. Now, I'm sure the 160MP sensors of 2019 will make your Superzoom from 1996 look better than ever but it will be like putting a lens baby or CCTV lens on todays best cameras.

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 02:42 UTC

Leica is having a hard time with ray angle on CMOS sensors. I bet they tweaked the lenses to make them more digital friendly but they don't want to make older designs look bad.

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2016 at 22:24 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply
On article Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 ED VR real-world sample gallery (112 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mssimo: Will high resolution cameras (think 60-120MP full frame) kill zoom lenses?

I understand some people don't like dxo but lets just give them a pass for this example... On DXO site, the best zoom on the 5Ds R is the Sigma 24-35mm f2 with "sharpness of 32MP" and the worse is the sigma 12-24 with "Sharpness of 8MP". Best Prime on same camera is 300mm 2.8L II with "45MP" and Tamron AF180 on the low end with score of "10MP"

As far as resolution, what lenses will meet the demand for 100MP? Best primes can squeeze (45MP) from the 51MP but zooms seem to be capped at "32MP" at the moment.

Will primes slowly start the road to outsell zooms?

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2016 at 22:14 UTC
On article Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 ED VR real-world sample gallery (112 comments in total)

Will high resolution cameras (think 60-120MP full frame) kill zoom lenses?

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2016 at 18:58 UTC as 37th comment | 8 replies
On article Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 ED VR real-world sample gallery (112 comments in total)

It may not be sharper than the original and more expensive but you are getting more lens for you money, its much bigger now.

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2016 at 17:58 UTC as 47th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Mssimo: On the studio comparison, base ISO 320 is heavily blurred. (shutter shock?) ISO 400 looks much better.

I read the entire article and I did see the disclaimer. Im surprised the images are posted without further research. Did you contact manufacture about issue? Was more than one copy of the body tested? Did you google the issue? What is near 1/125 of a sec? 1/90? 1/40? So when you ask me to "read the article", what I found is a lack of information, but i guess this is not a full review.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2016 at 19:12 UTC

On the studio comparison, base ISO 320 is heavily blurred. (shutter shock?) ISO 400 looks much better.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2016 at 16:35 UTC as 68th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Kabe Luna: Hmmm... Don't see anything in the samples that represents a significant advantage over monochrome images created from color captures. So, I'll stick with my Bayer cameras.

On this type of sensor, there is little to no need to sharpen. Did you ever look at a raw image with no sharpening?

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2016 at 16:20 UTC
On article Nikon's New D5 and D500 Push the Boundaries of DSLR (719 comments in total)

Best camera of 2016 * **

Small text:
* Of all models released in 2016 **At the time of publication, Jan 6 2016.

....Small time into the future, Sony A6100 and Sony A9 series come out. D500, and D5 become "and here are the runner up's"

Nikon has become the Ms. Colombia of cameras.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2016 at 22:55 UTC as 127th comment | 1 reply
On article Nikon's New D5 and D500 Push the Boundaries of DSLR (719 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ghislain Leduc: Pushed the boundaries? Really ? 3minutes recording in 4k that is pushing the boundaries?

Sorry but all the other stuff, it should have been up there 2-3 years ago... I really don't call these bodies special in anyway...

Bluetooth? So what...
20mp instead of 24mp ? Duh...
860g, where is the next technology in here?
What about also making those body more energy saving?
There are a few good things yes but absolutely nothing that pushed the boundaries...

Maybe only the ISO but we have still to see how much better image quality is at the top end.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2016 at 22:47 UTC
In reply to:

Mssimo: I think the number 4 is thought to be unlucky in Japan if I remember correctly. Maybe that is why the skipped D400 name. No idea why they kept D4 and others.

From HBR: Product names. It’s common for companies to release products in a numbered series. However, many companies remove the number 4 or the number 13 due to their bad luck connotations in the East and West, respectively. Japanese camera maker Fuji skips the series 4 and jumps directly from series 3 to series 5 for this reason. Likewise, Canon introduced its Powershot G15, skipping both G13 and G14.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2016 at 04:06 UTC
On article Kodak revives Super 8 with part-digital cine camera (362 comments in total)

I'll wait for the digital version of the Kodak 8mm in a few years.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2016 at 03:57 UTC as 142nd comment

I think the number 4 is thought to be unlucky in Japan if I remember correctly. Maybe that is why the skipped D400 name. No idea why they kept D4 and others.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 21:41 UTC as 21st comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

BlutengelNoUta: Wish there were some samples of song birds, or even city doves, at common birding distances. While one is able to see lovely detail in these shot the birds are too big and take up too much space in the frame.

Lets put big foot and chupacabra on the list while we are at it.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 17:38 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

halfwaythere: The biggest question that remains unanswered: will Thom Hogan be able to forgive Nikon?

Maybe that is buried deep within the specs.

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 22:13 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: Nx1 with a mirror and lower fps ;-) one year later.

P.s.: of course it'll score higher in dpr review.

$500 more than NX1

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 22:12 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mssimo: Show of hands: Nikon D500 or the rumored Sony A6100 ((see sonyalpharumors))

36mp BSI sensor,
silent electronic shutter mode,
IBIS (5 axis stabilization?)
4K recording
Touchscreen
Fast EVF larger than Optical VF on D810?
Wifi and other features
Price around $1000 to $1300 (my own guess)

<-- D810 owner. As far as "system goes" Being able to use Nikon, canon, sigma, Leica M, and so on.... that is the dream system. Add metabones turbo adapters and it gets silly.
@whyamihere
1: Why are you here? Also, no rush since Nikon is not on the streets yet.
2: Nikon has not released a compelling APS-C lens ever..and its been around for (13+ years?)
3: E-Mount lenses are high in price but Batis lenses are awesome. Nikon does have some awesome new FF tele lenses such as the 300 f4 and 200-500mm.
4: The D500 would be a great alternative to a Teleconverter. I dont know a TC that up's the frame rate to 10fps...kind of neat when you think about it that way.

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 21:40 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

Soggoth: $2000 looks a bit steep for DX camera

Ok, i was off by $500...my bad. I do wish nikon had the two f2.8 lenses samsung does. (current D810 owner BTW)

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 21:11 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

Soggoth: $2000 looks a bit steep for DX camera

Yeah...it not like someone will make something called a NX1 for $1000 less. Be realistic.

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 21:00 UTC
Total: 1018, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »