Mssimo

Mssimo

Lives in United States Minneapolis, MN, United States
Works as a Software Analyst
Joined on Jun 6, 2009

Comments

Total: 1066, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

So does lighting go from the ground up to the clouds? We need more FPS

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2017 at 23:27 UTC as 38th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

TN Args: Is the DPR website correct in saying that the 14/2.4 is only in EF mount?

Seems it only comes in canon and Nikon for now. They also have an autofocus version only for Sony but I believe its f2.8

Link | Posted on Dec 2, 2017 at 00:13 UTC
On article Sharp's new 8K camera is $77,000 (198 comments in total)

Can anyone confirm selfie mode?

Link | Posted on Nov 11, 2017 at 13:57 UTC as 13th comment

I would not call heart and star shape bokeh "professional-looking"

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2017 at 18:20 UTC as 22nd comment | 5 replies

Can anyone confirm full Sigma support? They have all the following listed. " ""Sigma SD9"""
" ""Sigma SD10"""
" ""Sigma SD14"""
" ""Sigma SD15"""
" ""Sigma SD1"""
" ""Sigma SD1 Merill"""
" ""Sigma DP1"""
" ""Sigma DP1 Merill"""
" ""Sigma DP1S"""
" ""Sigma DP1X"""
" ""Sigma DP2"""
" ""Sigma DP2 Merill"""
" ""Sigma DP2S"""
" ""Sigma DP2X"""
" ""Sigma DP3 Merill"""
" ""Sigma dp0 Quattro"""
" ""Sigma dp1 Quattro"""
" ""Sigma dp2 Quattro"""
" ""Sigma dp3 Quattro"""
" ""Sigma sd Quattro"""
" ""Sigma sd Quattro H"""

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2017 at 18:16 UTC as 57th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

Mssimo: Cant find anything about what cameras are supported

Download text file then rename to CSV. It will load up in Excel. It supports around 980 cameras/cel phones. Fuji is supported as well as sigma foveon/Quattro. LR does not even support sigma yet as far as I know.

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2017 at 18:15 UTC

Cant find anything about what cameras are supported

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2017 at 14:58 UTC as 99th comment | 7 replies
On article First iPhone X hands-on field test with sample photos (386 comments in total)
In reply to:

mckracken88: THE FUTURE, when looked at 1:1 pixels, looks so grainy and low detail, im super glad that im living in the present with my D800.

Haha the New York skyline pic in the corners is so freaking bad, it has more in common with a water color painting than an actual photograph.

Try to take a D800 into a football or concert. You will have a 50% success rate and it cant even upload to social media on its own.

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2017 at 20:27 UTC

would be nice to have only two ISO settings (LOW and HIGH)

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2017 at 19:24 UTC as 66th comment | 1 reply

50mm a copy of the sigma art? Seems like Pentax been rebranding lenses and it’s not a bad thing.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2017 at 23:31 UTC as 27th comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

Mssimo: Sony just setup the stage for a A9R model worth 75MP+ sensor

A9R would not be a sports camera; it would be the highest resolution camera in the lineup. A9s would be a 6K or 8K video cam.

A9 will keep its moderate resolution, high speed segment.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2017 at 12:07 UTC

Sony just setup the stage for a A9R model worth 75MP+ sensor

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2017 at 11:10 UTC as 217th comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

Mssimo: Or you can just stack 6 ebay UV filters on any lens. 6 elements in 6 groups. Add more filters for an "enhanced effect." Also works as an ND/flare enhancer. Im working on a new petroleum based product that will protect the front element while giving a nice creamy artistic image. It will come in both tube and jar containers. After a long day of beautiful pictures, it will have a side benefit while you sit in front of you computer and gaze at your creations.

I think you are on to something. Need to go pick up some SPF 50 and give it a trial run this weekend.

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2017 at 13:53 UTC

Holding off for Lightroom for Xbox ONE

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2017 at 13:51 UTC as 326th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

LessMirrored19: 6500 $ for manual focus lens
And people find 4500 $ for the Sony A9 is too much ....

Pay $1500 for a computer aided designed, super complex, nano/multi coated, and awesomely corrected lens or $6000 for this.

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2017 at 16:35 UTC

Or you can just stack 6 ebay UV filters on any lens. 6 elements in 6 groups. Add more filters for an "enhanced effect." Also works as an ND/flare enhancer. Im working on a new petroleum based product that will protect the front element while giving a nice creamy artistic image. It will come in both tube and jar containers. After a long day of beautiful pictures, it will have a side benefit while you sit in front of you computer and gaze at your creations.

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2017 at 16:29 UTC as 122nd comment | 4 replies

I look the same way when I have way too much Chinese food.

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2017 at 21:28 UTC as 132nd comment
In reply to:

Sdaniella: odd how some significant recent flagship smartphones not even tested yet ...

too bad dxomark never show how smartphone camera IQ compare one-on-one to larger sensor cameras in identical lighting scenarios, bright good light vs actual poor low light

churning out just rating numbers tell us nothing, showing us only bias of flawed and antiquated methodologies

Im sure they are burning to test out the Note 8

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 17:07 UTC
In reply to:

Mssimo: I would like to see a AMD Treadripper version. AMD has really come back this year.

I had a HP Z800 and Lenovo Workstations. Most photography software hate dual Processors (aka two physical processors in two distinct sockets). I ended up with most of the load on a single proc. If you want to see for yourself, search for comparisons of iMacs vs Mac Pro.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2017 at 15:08 UTC

I would like to see a AMD Treadripper version. AMD has really come back this year.

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2017 at 20:02 UTC as 75th comment | 2 replies
Total: 1066, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »