carlosdelbianco

Lives in Brazil São Paulo, Brazil
Has a website at www.carlosdelbianco.com
Joined on Oct 15, 2010

Comments

Total: 73, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Bruce kendall: For that kind of money you could do a lot better from an investment point of you.They must have money to waste?
Glad it aint my money

That's why you make more money than they do - they just take decisions based on intuition.

Link | Posted on Aug 15, 2012 at 17:56 UTC
On article Facebook pushes photo prominence in timeline (83 comments in total)
In reply to:

Camediadude: Please, for the love of mercy, no more about facebook...

Indeed. Is there another way to users to avoid this new layout? So, why bitch about it? Why post something about it? The only choice is to deactivate our accounts or close the DPR tab.

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2012 at 19:18 UTC
In reply to:

Jose Rocha: I'll get one for walking around the streets, but only IF vignetting is controlled. I had one Voiglander 20mm that vignettes like mad!

Yeah. CV lenses are great, but they always have a big drawback somewhere. Some will make you happy, some will make me happy. Hope this fits for all of us!

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2012 at 12:28 UTC
On article Canon issues allergy warning for EOS 650D/Rebel T4i (176 comments in total)

Hahahaha... This can't be serious. What's next, Canon?

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2012 at 02:33 UTC as 86th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

peevee1: Fixed focAl + fIxed Lens = FAIL

And Carl Zeiss, Hassie, Mamiya... Yeah, they're all garbage.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2012 at 16:34 UTC
In reply to:

carlosdelbianco: This might work: http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/06/canon-40mm-pancake-how-did-they-do-that

It doesn't, sorry.

Maybe, now it works! Thanks.

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2012 at 17:14 UTC

This might work: http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/06/canon-40mm-pancake-how-did-they-do-that

It doesn't, sorry.

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2012 at 16:51 UTC as 57th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

pauld77: No Android app...typical!

Yeah, it sucked.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2012 at 20:35 UTC
In reply to:

carlosdelbianco: It's funny to follow discussions going on here and on the previous story (Fujifilm launches M-mount adapter for X-Pro1's X-mount). Seems to me that M-mount owners have more to discuss than pricing and size of their equipment than these MFT people. Just saying...

Yeah, it makes sense, ManuelVilardeMacedo and mister_roboto. Unfortunately I did read, Manuel. Leica's new releases (and a Summicron for 7K) don't make sense to me at all, but I guess I'm not the target. Anyway, we still have Carl Zeiss! ;)

Link | Posted on May 25, 2012 at 17:07 UTC

It's funny to follow discussions going on here and on the previous story (Fujifilm launches M-mount adapter for X-Pro1's X-mount). Seems to me that M-mount owners have more to discuss than pricing and size of their equipment than these MFT people. Just saying...

Link | Posted on May 24, 2012 at 20:03 UTC as 33rd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

(unknown member): Cheap compared to a used Leica M series 75mm, that's for sure.

Leica is just like Olympus... Yeah!

Link | Posted on May 24, 2012 at 19:19 UTC
In reply to:

justmeMN: So they made a silver non-weather-sealed lens to go on their black weather-sealed camera?

It's a fast telephoto lens. Why is it intented for studio and indoor use only?

Link | Posted on May 24, 2012 at 19:11 UTC
In reply to:

Digitall: Expensive. M4/3 at DSLR prices or more..., nice motivation for who think that going to m4/3 would be "cheaper". The new AF-S Nikkor 85mm 1.8G is about $400 less. Just an idea.

No, @Digitall is not off. A Nikon 85mm would give a 170mm focal lenght when mounted on a MFT body. The lens is the same, the sensor is not.

The 135mm f/2.0 is a completely different lens and makes no sense comparing to the new Olympus or the 85mm, since it behaves like a 270mm f/4 in terms of depth of field and final image on sensor/card.

Nikon is cheaper, and there are no arguments against that.

Link | Posted on May 24, 2012 at 19:06 UTC
In reply to:

Riccardo IT: Too expensive.

That's why Leica is releasing a 7K slow lens and thinking it's alright.

Link | Posted on May 17, 2012 at 19:12 UTC
In reply to:

gavlis: Getting one for my up and coming trip to Africa. Going to be doing an article of the slums around Jo'burg. This is just what I needed to document it!

Sometimes people don't get jokes, it's alright.

Link | Posted on May 11, 2012 at 13:23 UTC
In reply to:

KAllen: Whenever Leica release anything I think there is a rush to be amongst the first to complain about the price. Should Leica build like the Nikon, Canon Olympus etc? just be another volume over quality camera maker, justify the price with more pointless software gadgetry built in.
I'm glad the World can still find a place for Leica, I'm glad people still make enough money to buy them.
The Leica value will be in this lens in twenty years time, my Canon gear will be worthless by then if it lasts that long.
I've never owned a Leica but I'm glad people do. I hope it sells well and I hopeit performs brilliantly even if it's just a bench mark for the others to be judged against.
I'd have one.

Cameras are tools, not jewelry.

Link | Posted on May 11, 2012 at 13:19 UTC
On article Leica unveils X2 16MP premium large-sensor compact (207 comments in total)

Panasonic, please release this for a grand and I'll buy it!

Link | Posted on May 11, 2012 at 13:15 UTC as 45th comment
On article Leica unveils X2 16MP premium large-sensor compact (207 comments in total)
In reply to:

simon65: Fixed non zoom lens = no sale.

When will Leica wake up?

Apparently you are not the target. Rangefinder users are not willing to buy any zoom lenses, since primes are better in many ways.

Link | Posted on May 11, 2012 at 13:13 UTC
In reply to:

dav1dz: People are missing the mark on this one. It's not all aperture rating or the lack thereof. Leica's produced a lens that is not affected the chromatic aberration.

There's no such a thing, dav1dz.

Link | Posted on May 10, 2012 at 23:25 UTC

Really ugly top plate. Lame new releases. May 10 was supposed to be more interesting...

Link | Posted on May 10, 2012 at 20:50 UTC as 104th comment
Total: 73, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »