Ysarex

You don't get quite the same level of integration in this case as you do from ACR/PS. Develop the raw file in SilkyPix by selecting the Development menu or clicking on the Develop icon. If you ...

The Fuji X-T2 is my second camera. My main camera has held that position through a Canon 5D mkII, Fuji X-E2 and now Fuji X-T2. My main camera is a Samsung EX2 and that's because wherever I go it goes.

If you plan to take photos with time and deliberation (without a client looking over your shoulder) and assume that you will post process the photos then a raw capture workflow would be most ...

It's not "best" to start shooting raw nor is it "best" to start shooting JPEGs. There are way too many additional qualifiers. To begin with who is learning and to what end? It may be the person ...

Workflow is the sequence of steps you take from captured image to finished image. Different photographers are going to handle the process differently. For example a professional sports photographer ...

The light sensitivity of the sensor is fixed when manufactured and can't change (troll alert: didn't mention dual gain sensors). So very physically, the sensor in your camera has one fixed light ...

Data (in or out) isn't stored on the sensor. It's stored in the camera's buffer (temporarily) and then moved to a storage card. ISO does not directly effect input (exposure). The ISO function ...

Here's lowly, good old ACDSee doing a respectable job: watercolor3

OMG! It's real! And Adobe hasn't fixed it yet.....Noooooo! Sorry, couldn't resist. Basically it's hard to find a raw converter that does as bad a job rendering fine detail from RAF files as Adobe. ...

No. I expect people to use LR in which case they WILL NOT and CAN NOT convert in Adobe RGB (LR won't permit that) and then if they post the result here they can output the final JPEG in whatever ...

I just did post that evidence. Raw files don't have color spaces and can't be shot in a color space. But you said, "If you convert in the color space as shot with ACR with default sharpening and ...

It is a raw file. Your comment about converting in the color space as shot is nonsensical and indicates you are clueless . It is a raw file. It has no color space and as a raw file it could not be ...

Put some evidence behind those words or they're as worthless as what the troll wrote. Option one: Here's an RAF file from an X-T2 with lots of high frequency detail: landscape Show us how well LR ...

On1 was not the developer of Genuine Fractals. They purchased the product years after it was fully developed. Iterated Systems (Michael Barnsley) developed Genuine Fractals.

I agree. Adobe has made improvements and the new X-Trans III sensor exhibits the problem to a lesser degree. So for most people with average use requirements I think it's no big deal but everyone ...

Know I don't think that, I know that and can easily prove it. If you want to pursue a proof let me know or just head back to that earlier thread: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/59896686 ...

Well if it's any consolation it's not just foliage -- it's fine detail in general and shows in all kind of conditions beyond just foliage. It's just particularly bad with foliage.

Cherry pick BS -- went to your Flickr page and clicked on first set of photos. Started to scroll and didn't get a dozen photos in before I knew I was seeing Adobe's classic fine detail problem ...

Not at all. And many thanks to Greg for providing proof.

Jerry's assessment and explanation are excellent and spot on. Adobe's weaker performance rendering fine detail with the X-Trans CFA is still evident as of today. How much it bothers you, how ...