Lives in Netherlands Netherlands
Works as a Illustrator / Photographer
Joined on Nov 3, 2002


Total: 215, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article CES 2017: Hands-on with the Kodak Super 8 (417 comments in total)

Perhaps is some circumstances a creative might need a certain 'look' for whatever reason, but what can be done with this that cannot be done with a digital cam and a decent retro filter?

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2017 at 13:58 UTC as 68th comment
On article Camera+ updated for dual-cam compatibility and Raw (14 comments in total)
In reply to:

fullstop: Try Pro Camera more expensive but better https://itunes.apple.com/au/app/procamera./id694647259?mt=8

Pro Camera is great, I have a lot of photo apps but always use Pro Camera.

Link | Posted on Dec 16, 2016 at 11:18 UTC

My first digital cam. In the highest quality setting it could fit 1 image on a floppy.
It had a 1.4 lens if I'm correct.

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2016 at 09:35 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply
On article Video: Shooting Dog Portraits with the Sony a6300 (188 comments in total)


Link | Posted on Nov 28, 2016 at 10:00 UTC as 105th comment

Who needs expensive decors for a SF-movie, just shoot it in places like this and you got really something.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2016 at 12:12 UTC as 16th comment | 3 replies

The problem is that all these expensive add-ons are for a mobile phone, and with all the technological developments on the mobile market, mobile phones have such a short lifespan these days.

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2016 at 20:15 UTC as 20th comment | 4 replies

What's wrong with a brown paper bag?

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2016 at 13:15 UTC as 48th comment
On article Throwback Thursday: Game Boy Camera (70 comments in total)

I had no idea this is considered vintage, I use it all the time.

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2016 at 11:21 UTC as 38th comment | 5 replies

Where can I get this screensaver?

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2016 at 12:32 UTC as 23rd comment
On article iPhone 7 real-world sample gallery (49 comments in total)

Very good for it's purpose, most phone pictures will be used for (social) media anyway. You mean you print your phone photo's and frame them on your wall, or put them in a photo-album? Choose a DSLR for that. For all other snaps and shots it's just bloody good.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 13:28 UTC as 23rd comment
On article Instagram officially launches 'save draft' feature (30 comments in total)

It would be nice to plan posts as well, just like in FB.

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2016 at 15:02 UTC as 9th comment
On article Petzval 58mm real-world samples (58 comments in total)

In some cases it produces wonders, in others absolute horror.

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2016 at 13:32 UTC as 26th comment | 2 replies
On article ESPN publishes iPhone 7 Plus photos from US Open (341 comments in total)

To some of the negatives below; I have an old cellphone somewhere, a small plastic Samsung and it could fold and it had a b&w display for 3 rows of text. This thing was the world when it came on the market. Imagine this was just a few years ago and look what we have now; an advanced digital darkroom in our pocket that takes pictures that could make you win a contest if you have some talent. Because a good picture is all about talent. And if you can't do it with this iPhone you shouldn't even discuss about poor dynamic range and D-SLR quality.

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2016 at 09:30 UTC as 66th comment
On article Apple unveils iPhone 7 and dual-cam iPhone 7 Plus (920 comments in total)

I know this is a camera site, but I think the loss of the headphone jack is a dramatic move from Apple. Like mentioned below, you can't listen to music while charging your phone (unless you are on blue tooth). That adapter is just a silly 90ies idea, I mean c'mon, like we don't have already enough crap to toss with us all day. I also think that very few headphone manufacturers will change the jack, as their headphones will become useless on any other device besides the iphone.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2016 at 08:49 UTC as 92nd comment | 5 replies

So how long are doing with our smartphones, a few years? Especially phones with Android software are notorious for just 1 or 2 system updates before they become completely uninteresting to it's manufacturers. Then what if we buy a new one, what to do with this expensive add-on module? It will become worthless. Bad investment if you ask me.

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2016 at 07:25 UTC as 3rd comment | 1 reply

Imagine that some day we will find this thing, covered with dust, at someone' garage sale, making fun of it's capacity.

Link | Posted on Aug 11, 2016 at 13:40 UTC as 23rd comment
In reply to:

Danny: Sooner or later we won't even call this 'an alternative to Photoshop' any longer. Adobe has become an insult and ruined their flagship with it's Cloud policy. I am glad Affinity Photo is doing so well, and I hope they will not take the Mickey with it's customers like Adobe did.

That is a comment I have heard before. But let's face it: how many fashion and car brands do we have? A LOT. And they all compete with each other. I have never heard of a Coke brand that was bought by Coca Cola just to avoid they where getting too popular. It is not just that simple, because if Adobe wanted to buy Affinity to avoid competition, they should have made a move 2 years ago. Now they are too late, as Affinity has a bright future, a lot more brighter than Adobe's future. We all know, this world is all about the pennies, and many-many more people will jump ship to Affinity to get rid of Adobe's monthly 'hand-in-the-pocket'.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2016 at 11:40 UTC

Sooner or later we won't even call this 'an alternative to Photoshop' any longer. Adobe has become an insult and ruined their flagship with it's Cloud policy. I am glad Affinity Photo is doing so well, and I hope they will not take the Mickey with it's customers like Adobe did.

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2016 at 10:22 UTC as 12th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

surlezi: Impressive software. I was thinking of investing time in learning Photoshop indepth but I might as well turn to Affinity. It's not The standard software though...

I don't think it is just that easy. So here is the competition, oh wait.. they become a problem but no worries, we'll buy them, end of story. This way, no company would ever have to face with competition again. And we all know there are a lot of car, lemonade and fastfood brands out there who compete with each other to get the most customers. Fact is, there is more competition on the market for Adobe since they went Could. And if They would buy Affinity, someone else will fill their place, sooner than later. I bought Affinity to support them and to make them more powerful to raise a big fat finger to Adobe. Instead of been a sheep and let them steal money out of your pocket each month you have to stand-up and buy Affinity! Buy it, it's cheap, it's great and you can help making it to become the next industry standard for crying out loud!

Link | Posted on Jun 27, 2016 at 14:31 UTC

Affinity. Pay once and it's yours.

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2016 at 14:52 UTC as 34th comment | 3 replies
Total: 215, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »