SamTruax

Lives in Canada Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Works as a Art Director
Joined on Jul 2, 2008
About me:

Own or have owned...
Casio QV 300
Canon A5
Casio EXlim7
Nikon Coolpix 5000
Nikon Coolpix 8800
Panasonic Lumix FZ18
Canon G9
Canon A570 IS
Canon A720 IS
Olympus E510 - w/kit lenses, 70-300, Panny Leica 14-50 f 2.8
Panasonic Lumix LX3
Fuji S100fs
Fuji S2 Pro
Fuji S5 Pro
Nikon 50 1.8, Tamron 90 2.8 Macro
Olympus E330
Olympus E520 w/kit 40-150 (new), Zuiko 18-180, Zuiko 50 f2
Canon G11
Pentax K-x w/kit 18-55, 55-300, FA 50 1.4, multiple old K and screw mount manual lenses
Canon G7
Sony R1
Canon EOS 10D
Olympus E-PL1
Panasonic G1
mZuiko 14-42, 17 2.8
Panny 20 1.7, 45-200
Sony TX5
Sigma DP1s
Fuji S200EXR
Panasonic LX5
Olympus E620, kit lenses, 50 f2, 14-54 Mk I, FL36R
Olympus E420
Sony HX100V
Olympus XZ-1
Panasonic G2
Panasonic 14-45

Comments

Total: 89, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Sony Cyber-shot RX10 Real-world Samples (162 comments in total)

This is not a good start. I don't see anything promising in these samples. Hopefully we will see something in better light soon. The Stylus 1 samples looked great in comparison and I am a big Sony fan.

Link | Posted on Oct 30, 2013 at 19:02 UTC as 48th comment | 13 replies
On article Just posted: Fujifilm X20 hands-on preview (118 comments in total)
In reply to:

kemal erdogan: The Fuji site says that the 12MP sensor use the same technology as XPRO1 and X100S.

it is likely that the sensor is exactly the same APS-C sensor used in the X100S.

I come to this conclusion by the fact the X20 supports all of 9/16, 2/3, 3/4, 1/1 aspect ratios, which implies that the sensor is at least as large as the diameter of the image circle both in height and width.

Least costly option to achieve this is just to use a bit bigger sensor and I think Fuji took that path. Lower pixel count is also consistent with that possibility.

And, I am thrilled at the possibility of having the low light capabilities of Xpro1 in such a small camera

Sorry, you are confusing me. How exactly can the 2/3 sensor of the X20 be the same as the APS-C sensor in the X100s? The size isn't even close. Maybe they are using the same techonology, processing, whatever but I don't think it is possible to have the same sensor.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2013 at 16:17 UTC
In reply to:

SH Photo: Any idea what the bit-rate is for the video?

I was wondering that myself. The X20 is 36 Mbps but I don't think this one will be that good...different sensor and processor. If it is at least up to 24 o r28 then it might be decent.

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2013 at 22:58 UTC
On photo 19DSC00792_rb in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

Is that bartender dressed as a boyscout?

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2012 at 16:13 UTC as 2nd comment
On a photo in the Sony Alpha SLT-A99 Review Samples sample gallery (2 comments in total)

Is that bartender dressed as a boyscout?

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2012 at 16:13 UTC as 2nd comment
On a photo in the Sony Alpha SLT-A99 Review Samples sample gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

pascal b: is it an example supposed to be good from this new "beast" associated with such an expensive lens ???
nothing is crisp !
or did I miss something ?

Have a look at the first photo of the girl's face and tell me there is any detail lacking in her right eye. It's pretty remarkable.

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2012 at 15:50 UTC
On photo 02DSC01105_rb in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

pascal b: is it an example supposed to be good from this new "beast" associated with such an expensive lens ???
nothing is crisp !
or did I miss something ?

Have a look at the first photo of the girl's face and tell me there is any detail lacking in her right eye. It's pretty remarkable.

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2012 at 15:50 UTC
On photo DSCN0940 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

This image really speaks to me :-)

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2012 at 17:06 UTC as 2nd comment
On a photo in the Nikon Coolpix P7700 Preview Samples sample gallery (2 comments in total)

This image really speaks to me :-)

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2012 at 17:06 UTC as 2nd comment

Considering they are all going to be connected in probably the very near future, why do they need a special name at all?

Its just another function on the camera.

WiFi enabled
App enabled
GPS enabled

just functions or specs.

I do like CAMOphone from below though :-)

Link | Posted on Oct 2, 2012 at 17:48 UTC as 22nd comment
In reply to:

tkbslc: "In the field of digital cameras, we will seek to achieve collaboration in a manner that further improves the competitiveness of the two companies."

Considering that NEX and m4/3 directly compete, I wonder what that means.

It would be nice if it meant a Sony NEX with a respectable kit lens like the ones Olympus usually puts together.

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 18:47 UTC
In reply to:

jquagga: I think many folks give you guys/gals way too much grief on what you do and I try to be positive. However you did ask for feedback so, I'm sorry in advance!

I think this moves the ball the wrong directly. "Community-based moderation" will be abuse city. Trolling, fanboyism - if you're going to enable this I'd like the option to completely disable it. i.e., I want to view the forums without the moderation at all. I don't care a troll mod'ed something down. I want to see it.

Blue on black is harder to read than yellow on black. At least there is the option to revert. Can we make that part of my default profile so I'm always reverted?

Where's the mobile layout or tapatalk integration? That's one of the major limitations of the current layout.

As others have said, why aren't you moving to something standard? Why not leverage work others have done and implement a modern forum system many already use?

Why not ask for input before pouring months of work in?

The font size should be changed within your browser settings. It isn't something that can be set at their end and affect every different browser that reads it.
Just make the change within your own settings.

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 14:09 UTC
On article Hasselblad responds to Lunar criticisms (613 comments in total)

So we all know that the most important elements with regards to IQ are the sensor and the lens... and both of those are exactly what you can get with the NEX 7 (they even admit to NOT tweaking the Sony sensor)...heck, you can get a pretty good combo with the F3, 5R or the 6, for that matter.
I think they are totally out of touch with reality.

Sad thing is they will definitely sell a few of them and declare it a great success.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 20:36 UTC as 287th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

peevee1: "In addition to superior still image quality, the 1080p Full HD Movie capability with stereo sound captures movies in the best quality currently available in compact cameras. "

That is simple not true. Looks like the press-release was written before RX100 either. Another era, simpler times... :)

Poor shmucks caught with their pants down...

In Marketing Speak anything that produces full HD 1080 p would be considered the "best quality currently available". It's based on the spec...not the actual video that comes out of that camera.
Unfortunately if the video is anything like what the XZ-1 produced it will be crap... at least in comparison to any of the Sony models.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 16:11 UTC
In reply to:

qwertyasdf: When P&S and camera phones are moving on to larger sensors
Someday, the Q might have the smallest sensor not just amongst other CSCs, but all photo-taking gadgets....
Way to go.

@ Edgar Matias
Actually Panasonic DOES sell a similar lens that actually has a range of 25 mm to 600 mm (equiv) constant f 2.8 and I think it sells for around $599 as part of the FZ200. Same size sensor...
I think the Q series are definitely cute but I wish people would put some perspective on what they are getting. It is definitely a niche market and a fun camera to play with but it doesn't miraculously do things that other similarly sized and speced cameras don't do at a lower price...and maybe those cameras are a load of fun for some people too.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 14:56 UTC
In reply to:

Sdaniella: Finally a flexible screen that has Face-FORWARD utility topside and works while on a tripod... (rather than bottom side which doesn't work with a tripod)

now all they need to do is offer a flexible vari-angle swivel screen, VASS, like Canon PowerShots... and Sony CyberShot DSC-R1

given the NEX is a very small-form factor... such a VASS would make more sense on larger alpha-SLT models instead (which all currently STILL lack full flexibility, just up/down tilt only or flexible, but stuck 'bottom-side' (SLT-A65)).

however, given NEX are close to most digicams in size... a VASS isn't that unreasonalbe (PowerShot G series... Samsung TL500 (EX1) to mention a couple)

@ TrojMacReady
Please show me a NEX 3 that has an LCD with face-forward utility.
sdyue is wrong in stating that this camera is the first to have it but the NEX 3, 5, C3, 5N definitely don't have it. I believe the first NEX with the flip up LCD was the F3.

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 20:40 UTC
On article Review: Nokia 808 PureView (349 comments in total)

I'm all for technology and I think that this little camera phone is a good achievement but I really can't say I am impressed by the images it produces.
The higher ISO images are not bad...they are terrible.
Low ISO shots are definitely acceptable...especially considering the amount of detail you can get with that many MP but the colors don't look very accurate and WB looks to be an issue in anything but bright sunlight.
I am just amazed that some are comparing detail against something like the D800. We need to get some perspective on exactly what this camera/phone can produce.

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2012 at 16:34 UTC as 86th comment | 2 replies
On photo DSC00223 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jan Toude: Grass is smeared. It's Sony...

Shoot RAW then :-)

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2012 at 15:14 UTC
On a photo in the Sony RX100 preview samples sample gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jan Toude: Grass is smeared. It's Sony...

Shoot RAW then :-)

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2012 at 15:14 UTC
On article Just Posted: Sony DSC-RX100 preview with sample images (642 comments in total)
In reply to:

zeev a: when i wrote this words last time " I was looking forward to see an f2.0 lens and 6x zoom in this class of camera .if canon can make it on s100 why not here ?" on the canon GX1, I get an anser that is not possible and now came sony and make smaller camera with an F1.8 lens .so it can be done . well done sony .

Canon should have been able to do better, size wise, but this Sony sensor is still considerably smaller than the one in the Canon G1X.
However, I expect that the Sony will do very well in comparison.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2012 at 14:01 UTC
Total: 89, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »