Schwermetall

@BrightTiger: "...pros) have a hard time even recreating the jpg result".
Well I don't want to recreating the jpg result.
For the jpg looks good on a smartphone but not so on a 27" screen.
I don't...

I absolutly agree with you.
For me it's essential and the reason not to buy the Note 8.

@ left eye
thanks a lot for your explanations.
Sorry that I've used the wrong terms in my statements due to my bad english.

@ its_a_knife, you are right, drop frame was not the right word and 120fps would match at least for 24, 30 & 60fps.
But also pulldowns doesn't work smooth.
I mean if you have a real movie and you...

I agree to all of you and I like the 24-look too.
But the point is when there is a 24 content it's a must to look it with 24fps otherwise you will have drop frames.
Maybe my standard is different...

Great video but what I never understand is why you are filming with 24fps for YouTube?
In my opinion it makes no sense because nobody on earth is looking YouTube with 24 fps.
They all have...

... and what does this mean?

Canon does this "mistake" once with the 5DII and started the "movies with DSLR" story.
Sadly they didn't repeat this "mistake"
... and I must changed to Fujifilm :-)

... and still no RAW for the tele. Sorry that's a no-go.

Wishlist are allways good. Especially at Christmas time and even more in case of Canon ;-)