IR1234

Joined on Jun 12, 2016

Comments

Total: 381, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Graham C F: I am surprised that so many people add the date to the file names of their photos. It is included in searchable metadata anyway.

Adding a date code prevents having a filename being reused. I shudder to think how many people have all these folder structures and then myriads of IMG_0001s all over their drives.

Link | Posted on Dec 7, 2022 at 14:59 UTC

/year/date+event/date-event+timerange/year-date-event-timerange-IMG_xxxx.JPG

So

/2022/dec-3-someones5k/dec-3-someones5k-0800-0830/2022-dec-3-someones5k-0800-0830-IMG_1234.JPG

We split on time ranges because less than 10,000 photos on a single camera is not guaranteed. But this allows us to have 12m photographs all uniquely named, and the hierarchy allows instant access if we have support issues.

Link | Posted on Dec 7, 2022 at 14:50 UTC as 23rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

IR1234: What is the camera experience like?

Yeah, that kinda sucks to be honest. Sounds like it's no different from the original Mavic Pro, Spark or even the FPV.

Link | Posted on Nov 11, 2022 at 16:02 UTC
In reply to:

IR1234: What is the camera experience like?

How responsive is it? If you hit the shutter, how quickly can you go again for instance? And I don't care for x shot burst.

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2022 at 15:11 UTC

What is the camera experience like?

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2022 at 17:21 UTC as 9th comment | 4 replies

Meh, one of our 7D2 broke through 4m last month. I posted it on Canon 7D2 Mark II group on Facebook if you want to see the shutter count.

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2022 at 19:06 UTC as 5th comment | 1 reply
On article Canon EOS R3 studio scene published (258 comments in total)
In reply to:

IR1234: What is going on with Sony's skin tones? Look at the black guy and there is a huge difference yet older Sony's are much closer to the Canon look. And the Asian lady has such red rosey cheeks she looks like an alcoholic.

@mikegt, what lie about the colors being bad? The evidence is there right in front of you. Yet some of you cling to this “we reprint the photos”, except the timeline does not confirm that at all. Cameras that were tested at similar times do not show these extraordinarily horrid skin tones. And yes, Sony always wins and get high praise on DPR, it’s what DPR does.

Link | Posted on Nov 29, 2021 at 03:06 UTC
On article Canon EOS R3 studio scene published (258 comments in total)
In reply to:

IR1234: What is going on with Sony's skin tones? Look at the black guy and there is a huge difference yet older Sony's are much closer to the Canon look. And the Asian lady has such red rosey cheeks she looks like an alcoholic.

@mikeran, if the images fade, why is the 1DX3 and R3 the same (a year apart), yet the Sony which would have been reviewed at a similar time as the 1DX3 and R6 different? Seems like we're covering for Sony's awful skin tones here by making stuff up.

Link | Posted on Nov 28, 2021 at 17:38 UTC
On article Canon EOS R3 studio scene published (258 comments in total)
In reply to:

IR1234: What is going on with Sony's skin tones? Look at the black guy and there is a huge difference yet older Sony's are much closer to the Canon look. And the Asian lady has such red rosey cheeks she looks like an alcoholic.

@waldi, DPR doesn’t reprint the face photos each time they do this comparison, so there is no variation in the scene. Hence wondering why the colors keep changing. Kinda thought that was obvious.

Link | Posted on Nov 27, 2021 at 04:03 UTC
On article Canon EOS R3 studio scene published (258 comments in total)

What is going on with Sony's skin tones? Look at the black guy and there is a huge difference yet older Sony's are much closer to the Canon look. And the Asian lady has such red rosey cheeks she looks like an alcoholic.

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2021 at 18:45 UTC as 18th comment | 22 replies

Run that past me again, $3,000-5,000?

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2021 at 02:52 UTC as 107th comment | 12 replies
On article Nikon Z9 review: a DSLR-like stills/video monster (3188 comments in total)
In reply to:

IR1234: Great camera, but what's with that chonky looking flip out screen?

Settle down tiger lol

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2021 at 18:40 UTC
On article Nikon Z9 review: a DSLR-like stills/video monster (3188 comments in total)

Great camera, but what's with that chonky looking flip out screen?

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2021 at 15:11 UTC as 287th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

GodSpeaks: Long overdue.

Next up, put an end to non removable batteries in phones.
Standardize battery sizes and shapes.

How far do you intend to go with standarizations? For instance, car batteries? Surely we only need 3 or 4 types. Car alternators, we could standardise to 3-4 again, how about the indicator stalk - I mean - how many different indicator stalks does the world need for a vehicle? And why is everyone's keyboard so different? Lets just have one standard QWERTY design, and let's have a single design for a keyboard.

Why not go all the way - why do we need different camera mounts? Lets just have a standard camera mount, say M42 with some electrics and call it done? Same camera battery. Heck, why not have the same shutter across every camera? Why not have a standard menu system, and why not have a standard layout on the camera itself across the industry?

Remember, all these things are all good for the consumer.

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2021 at 14:46 UTC
In reply to:

GodSpeaks: Long overdue.

Next up, put an end to non removable batteries in phones.
Standardize battery sizes and shapes.

How far do you intend to go with standarizations? For instance, car batteries? Surely we only need 3 or 4 types. Car alternators, we could standardise to 3-4 again, how about the indicator stalk - I mean - how many different indicator stalks does the world need for a vehicle? And why is everyone's keyboard so different? Lets just have one standard QWERTY design, and let's have a single design for a keyboard.

Why not go all the way - why do we need different camera mounts? Lets just have a standard camera mount, say M42 with some electrics and call it done? Same camera battery. Heck, why not have the same shutter across every camera? Why not have a standard menu system, and why not have a standard layout on the camera itself across the industry?

Remember, all these things are all good for the consumer.

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2021 at 14:46 UTC
In reply to:

Logan Mackay: So many people crying innovation. What is so innovative about Apple’s outdated USB 2.0 Lightning connection? They’ve already adopted USB-C for all their other products. This is good for the consumer and for technology.

No one really cares about lightning data speeds, we just use them for charging up the phone.

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2021 at 18:21 UTC
In reply to:

Michael Piziak: But how is Apple going to continue to create proprietary cords at top dollar premium prices - hoping that you'll lose a cord, or one will go bad, and have to purchase another one from Apple - ???

You know you can buy Lightning cables from Amazon, right?

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2021 at 18:15 UTC
In reply to:

Michael Piziak: But how is Apple going to continue to create proprietary cords at top dollar premium prices - hoping that you'll lose a cord, or one will go bad, and have to purchase another one from Apple - ???

You know you can buy Lightning cables from Amazon, right?

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2021 at 18:15 UTC

So, Apple wireless charging only in 2024 then? Looking forward to it.

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2021 at 16:02 UTC as 21st comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

acuberosm: The Canon 35-70mm f/4 FD AF lens was from 1981, not 1979. I remembered when it was launched.

The 35-70 AF (in 1981) was based on the manual focus 35-70 FD from 1979. HTH

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2021 at 03:55 UTC
Total: 381, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »