d3xmeister

Yes, I got my GX80 12-32mm kit for 575 dollars the day it was available in my country. Yes it was already available for over a month in other markets, but when it got here, it was already at very ...

There is nothing in the Fuji line-up that can even come close in size and weight to my kit: GX9, 7.5mm f/2, 12-32mm kit, 15mm f/1.7, 42.5mm f/1.7 and 45-175mm PZ. Is there an IQ trade-off ? Hmmm, ...

Only when the light or the need for a higher shutter speed requires raising the ISO. It’s actually the base ISO where a larger sensor usually has the advantage, it will result in cleaner output. Al ...

OK fair enough.

That’s a baseless preference, but nevertheless a preference, in which case why would you chose 4/3 format in the first place. Your math is also a bit biased, since you’re comparing a lowest MP m43 ...

Not sure this really answer my question but ok, so why don’t you just do it and be happy with it ? I use a A7R and in the past I’ve also had other formats in parallel to my 4/3 or m43. I know the ...

You know what I never understood, although I raised this question multiple times to you and others but never really got a reply ? If you, or anybody else, is into such huge prints that you have to ...

It would’t really matter since they serve quite different purposes. Maybe a comparison with the Oly 40-150mm Pro. I don’t know the prices but it wouldn’t be fair since the Olyy is clearly a better ...

Actually, I think it can be bought to some extent. How many people do you think they almost always choose to buy gear instead of a trip to a wonderful place, or a workshop with a world class ...

Damn your photos are just AWESOME !!! Sorry, I had to use upper case 😊

I was actually only referring to Ansel Adams and Henri Bresson, not the movie industry

We are in the same situation, or at least heading that way. Back in those days ILC’s were crazy expensive, I saved years to by my first SLR and lenses. In the small city I grew up in, only one ...

Yes, it will be more than ,,a bit less,, with a A7III and other cameras It does. So will a newer m43 camera and a faster lens, both which they are available. As usual, it's always a trade-off. For ...

Yep, I feel the same way. For some reason when I'm using totally different cameras, like you say, slow vs fast for example, it completely changes not only the experience, but the way I see and ...

If you're a pro, and you need the greater capabilities of your FF Canon, I would not switch. Yes you'd save weight, but there's always a trade-ff, with everything, no matter which direction you're ...

Here's my take on this. If you could go back in time in that exact moment, with a larger sensor camera and an appropriate, not ,,equivalent,, lens you'd have the option for: - the exact same photo, ...

Reading your OP, it seems you're like the GOD of lens ratings. The way you categorise some marvellous lenses as ,,not good enough,, really made me giggle. But maybe I'm wrong, can you point us to a ...

I wouldn't buy one, simply because I don't need one. The Sony and Panasonic cameras you mentioned are the best in low light for video. For stills, there's hardly any difference between them and ...

With all due respect, I've watched your galleries and blog for quite a while and I haven't been able to tell which gear you've used, or see any photo that striked me in any way that it couldn't be ...

It all comes down to a concept that was rarely, if ever, acknowledged on these forums. The concept of good enough. See, unlike here, the real world functions quite differently. This is why the ...