d3xmeister

That must be fake. Just check out recent topics about m43 being more close to iphone quality and producing ,,lifeless,, photos. You expect me to believe that this was taken with an ancient m43 ...

I doubt that, unless you're talking about jpegs, then I will agree jpeg engines are have become more flat and lifeless. This reminds me of the endelss discussions on leica forums about the Leica M9 ...

I can tell you my reasons for not buying the V and waiting for VI. Touchscreen is one. Great AF with PDAF but in video there is no way to tell it where to focus. That's a big issue for me. And ...

I shot that Canon sensor, and I find my GX85 to be the same or better regarding noise, and noise in shadows. If you see more noise from the GX85 when lifting shadows, maybe the cameras expose ...

It could be a software bug that doesn't turn bluetooth off, even though you do in the menus.

I shot in 3:2 for most of my life, and still do with some of my camera, but still don't find any appealing in this aspect ratio. It never fit anything I shot.

It's all nonsense. The ,,3:2,, people are used to that and that's all there is to it. And I can say the same for 4:3 people but at least there are still some 4:3 displays around in tablets for ...

I agree, I prefer the 4/3 format for people photos, any kind of portrait orientation photo, and other photos of stuff, subjects that fit better in the 4/3 format. On TV's and computers, some look ...

Probably a skilled photograper will get much better results with any of the combination than a less skilled photographer with the other combination. I think there are situations where the E-M1.2 ...

It's probably the Bluetooth. That stays on even when the camera is off. It can be disbled though.

What DxO does is automatically reduce noise more in flat areas while preserving details where needed. It's not perfect, and exporting (you have to export to see the results) takes much longer than ...

First you have to understand that underexposing like that will introduce noise with any camera. Sure having a much bigger sensor with much more megapixels will help minimize the issue, but any ...

I don't know about the GH5 but in earlier Panasonics this is not possible. I always found this to be really stupid, because it will make using semi-auto modes much useful.

In my experience, f8 is already in ,,soft,, theritory for most m/43 lenses. F2.8 and f/4 are usually the sharpest, with f/5.6 maybe the best balance of depth of field and sharpness. Think of it as ...

I wasn't mentioning any specific review.

Not really, I've seen reviewers saying the Panasonic system worked identically for them, compared to the E-M1.2 For me, the Olympus system always worked better than others, but I'm sure the other ...

Your E-M10II has the older 5-axis IS from the original E-M5. The newer implementations have improved electromagnets and software and it is more efficient. Comparing IS will never  very relevant to ...

Bad Olympus ! In the tough market they are, to treat a customer who buys your pro, expensive gear like they did is crazy. I was pleasantly surprised by Olympus in my 4/3 years (not micro) I had a ...

Yes, I do agree. I was only taking raw into account. Jpegs are much better on Olympus. And yes, Panasonic metering is a bit ,,hotter,, which for jpeg is not good, for raw, I like to shoot a bit to ...

Superb !