d3xmeister

Lives in Romania Alexandria, Romania
Works as a Radio DJ
Joined on Jan 24, 2010

Comments

Total: 146, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

noggin2k1: Awaiting the fan club claiming their beloved M43 bodies deliver far superior IQ...

Happpy 11th anniversary !

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2018 at 10:33 UTC
In reply to:

noggin2k1: Awaiting the fan club claiming their beloved M43 bodies deliver far superior IQ...

Noggin2k1 based on your online presence there's evidence that you haven't actually took any photo or ever used any camera, though you act like an authority in this field. What's your next agenda, going to racing forums telling them how and what to drive ? Or maybe audiophile forums and tell them how to and what to listen to ? I wonder what a psychologist would think about the opening of this discussion, I remember something about this in my psychology manual, page 253.

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2018 at 21:48 UTC
In reply to:

noggin2k1: Awaiting the fan club claiming their beloved M43 bodies deliver far superior IQ...

I thought FF was the pinnacle of photography.

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2018 at 16:13 UTC
In reply to:

d3xmeister: I’m still foolishly hoping that Nikon or Canon would stop dicking around and build a mirrorless identical with their DSLRs, that use the same mount and lenses, just adding the huge benefits of mirrorless technology. Size impact of the larger flange distance doesn’t mean squat, a smaller camera handles poorly with pro lenses, and adapting lenses is not something pro’s are intersted in, we have Sony and m43 for having fun with that.

Yep, that could be correct.

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2018 at 13:34 UTC
In reply to:

d3xmeister: I’m still foolishly hoping that Nikon or Canon would stop dicking around and build a mirrorless identical with their DSLRs, that use the same mount and lenses, just adding the huge benefits of mirrorless technology. Size impact of the larger flange distance doesn’t mean squat, a smaller camera handles poorly with pro lenses, and adapting lenses is not something pro’s are intersted in, we have Sony and m43 for having fun with that.

@Drive that wasn’t the point. You have a choice if light weight and smaller size is what you want. Many choices. It’s about making mirrorless taking over, and that won’t happen until you see Joe McNally, Moose Peterson, Chase Jarvis shooting their high paying jobs with mirrorless. Unlike hobbyists who buy tons of stuff they don’t actually need and make a lifestyle out of this, the pro’s are business men, and I bet none of them will switch until Nikon or Canon produce a D5, 1Dx, D850, 5D in the same form factor, whithout technical compromises, that can use their lenses, but with the added benefits of mirrorless. In fact, if you follow some of them in interviews and stuff, you’ll see that’s exactly what they want

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2018 at 08:11 UTC
In reply to:

d3xmeister: I’m still foolishly hoping that Nikon or Canon would stop dicking around and build a mirrorless identical with their DSLRs, that use the same mount and lenses, just adding the huge benefits of mirrorless technology. Size impact of the larger flange distance doesn’t mean squat, a smaller camera handles poorly with pro lenses, and adapting lenses is not something pro’s are intersted in, we have Sony and m43 for having fun with that.

They can use the thick form factor for big battery, powerful processor and cooling system for example. This kind of form factor can be used to build a real DSLR replacement, a non-compromise camera with mirrorless technology, which we currently don’t have.

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2018 at 08:01 UTC
In reply to:

d3xmeister: I’m still foolishly hoping that Nikon or Canon would stop dicking around and build a mirrorless identical with their DSLRs, that use the same mount and lenses, just adding the huge benefits of mirrorless technology. Size impact of the larger flange distance doesn’t mean squat, a smaller camera handles poorly with pro lenses, and adapting lenses is not something pro’s are intersted in, we have Sony and m43 for having fun with that.

It doesn’t matter. Most pro’s aren’t using mirrorless for these reasons, they don’t want to buy new lenses, and they don’t want a smaller fiddly camera. They do want mirrorless tech though. A Sony FE clone won’t appeal pro’s. Sony billion dollar marketing had hobbysts believe that pro’s are switching to Sony, but they aren’t. And that’s Canikon market which they would want to keep.

Link | Posted on Jan 13, 2018 at 23:30 UTC

I’m still foolishly hoping that Nikon or Canon would stop dicking around and build a mirrorless identical with their DSLRs, that use the same mount and lenses, just adding the huge benefits of mirrorless technology. Size impact of the larger flange distance doesn’t mean squat, a smaller camera handles poorly with pro lenses, and adapting lenses is not something pro’s are intersted in, we have Sony and m43 for having fun with that.

Link | Posted on Jan 13, 2018 at 21:39 UTC as 60th comment | 16 replies
In reply to:

ZeBebito: For those bokeh lovers, better jump to a bigger format. My Canon 40mm 2.8 is superb optically and goes for 90 bucks.

My grandma is a wizard with javascript

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2017 at 19:42 UTC
In reply to:

ZeBebito: For those bokeh lovers, better jump to a bigger format. My Canon 40mm 2.8 is superb optically and goes for 90 bucks.

More than anything else, now I feel sorry for the people doing business with you, or anything for that matter. And hope you don’t get more chances to ,,educate,, people

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2017 at 16:46 UTC
In reply to:

ZeBebito: For those bokeh lovers, better jump to a bigger format. My Canon 40mm 2.8 is superb optically and goes for 90 bucks.

I’m glad it makes you feel better about yourself.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2017 at 10:18 UTC
In reply to:

ZeBebito: For those bokeh lovers, better jump to a bigger format. My Canon 40mm 2.8 is superb optically and goes for 90 bucks.

Your level of intelligence is shorter that Sigma’s new ultra-wides. But keep talking, I enjoy reading idiotic blurbs in my free time. For me, it’s pure comedy.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2017 at 00:33 UTC
In reply to:

ZeBebito: For those bokeh lovers, better jump to a bigger format. My Canon 40mm 2.8 is superb optically and goes for 90 bucks.

At least I don't charge money for junk

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2017 at 23:58 UTC
In reply to:

ZeBebito: For those bokeh lovers, better jump to a bigger format. My Canon 40mm 2.8 is superb optically and goes for 90 bucks.

You understand lenses just as good as my grandma' understands javascript

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2017 at 23:24 UTC
On article Review: Affinity Photo 1.5.2 for desktop (299 comments in total)
In reply to:

d3xmeister: I love that what these guys are doing. At least now we have a choice besides following the satanic-like cult of Adobe

Justy because I want to. It's a free world

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2017 at 16:56 UTC
On article Review: Affinity Photo 1.5.2 for desktop (299 comments in total)
In reply to:

d3xmeister: I love that what these guys are doing. At least now we have a choice besides following the satanic-like cult of Adobe

I never used Lighroom. I used Photoshop. And no it is not easy at all to switch. And yes this move can be made by any company. And yes this is exactly how those satanic cults operate, the principle is identical.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 15:54 UTC
On article Review: Affinity Photo 1.5.2 for desktop (299 comments in total)
In reply to:

d3xmeister: I love that what these guys are doing. At least now we have a choice besides following the satanic-like cult of Adobe

Unless you chosed to learn Adobe software for 15 years and now got screwed.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 08:56 UTC
On article Review: Affinity Photo 1.5.2 for desktop (299 comments in total)

I love that what these guys are doing. At least now we have a choice besides following the satanic-like cult of Adobe

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2017 at 19:02 UTC as 38th comment | 7 replies
On article Throwback Thursday: the Canon PowerShot G1 (163 comments in total)

$1100. And people are complaining the cameras today are expensive.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2017 at 18:52 UTC as 66th comment
In reply to:

mbot: Without a removable battery I will never pay such an outrageous price. A $400 Android phone does the same things, has Gorilla Glass 5, has the same size battery and has a Snapdragon 835 cpu, so why would I pay for a silly prententious outrageously overpriced sh_tty iPhone??

These manufacturers are expecting us to throw the phone away after three years when the battery is not optimal anymore, planned obscelescence - but not on my ship. I will stick with $300 Android phones - $100 a year (30¢ a day) for a phone is all I'm willing to stomach.

Bring back removable batteries and I'll happily pay $699 for a phone.

I agree and that's happening on both sides. But to be honest, I mostly see people bashing iphone buyers calling them sheeps, stupid all kind off stuff, actually this whole conversation was started from that.

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2017 at 20:11 UTC
Total: 146, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »