LJohnK2

Article is properly contextualized and is spot on..... but as always folks will argue red is blue, etc.

.......seriously, coming from twin D5100's,  there is not a huge difference in portability to the e m 10 mk ii......it's the features EVF,lenses/primes,etc available that are the biggest ...

For an alternative RAW editor to Lightroom try a trial version of Cyberlink PhotoDirector......l run it side by side with the last version of standalone Lightroom and will migrate entirely to it ...

After using PhotoDirector 9 along side Lightroom 6.14 for a year now.....I am no longer dreading my eventual Body update, which will require the need to buy into the Lightroom subscription...

As a rule, l avoid these type of threads but in this case l can't resist.....am I the only one that finds  the labeling of Oly as irrelevant from this particular camera gear Prophet rather ironic  ?

.....well l respectfully disagree that the new 20 MP sensor is far better......with Oly, I much prefer the RAW files at +800 ISO from the 16 MP sensor.....ISO below 800, IQ about the same albeit...

Yes, the Nikon P1000 has a wonderful range in focal length but to do this, it is built around a tiny 1/2.3" sensor.....not a big market for +$1,000 cameras that are big, heavy with mediocre...

1) Point & shoots have been replaced with cell phones with the exception of a small market segment for waterproof cameras for the beach
2) MFT: 20 MP vs 16 came with high ISO noise penalty, new...

......engineering more MP's on the limited footprint that comes with FT vs APS-C let alone FF is no doubt a formidable challenge and while more MP's is possible..... as the tiny 1/2.5 sensors in ...

.....l think you may just have a bad copy of the Oly 45mm....l bought one more or less on a whine last year.....l wanted something slightly longer than my go to Panasonic 20 mm and didn't want to ...

....had an omd e-m10 and now 2- OMD e-m10 mkII and have never encountered this despite some very brisk use....weird

Great article........l remember hating the concept of mirrorless from the get go.....illogical reaction borne of ignorance, but l cut myself some slack because I still see folks with more...

Very nice photos.....your narrative reminds me of a wildlife park I visited years ago with my then young son....albeit l have no mixed feelings about a conventional zoo. Thanks for sharing.

I just wondered if there has been any indication as to whether or not we will see a Full Review of the Panasonic GX9 or is the First Impressions it ? Thanks,

I think so.....an Oly 14-54 mki.....albeit I didn't do specific tests until it became very obvious..... I always assumed I simply overlooked it or didn't shoot anything that made it ...

l had back focus problem with the Olympus FT 14-54 Mk ii on the e-m10 and to a lesser extent on the e-m10 Mk ii.  Was addressed by Olympus with switch out of some internal lens ...

Finally a small durable take anywhere with evf ......but then a tiny sensor crammed with 20 mp equals useless IQ......my cellphone with an Otterbox is still better than this for most things that...

25 mm is often to tight indoors and yet too short if you are trying not to be noticed.....some people swear by it but l find 25 mm is just kind of awkward on 4/3 aspect ratio.

.... the improved lBIS of the Oly 10 mk ll is worth the upgrade and for indoor use the Panasonic 25mm, f1.7 is a great alternative to the Oly 25 mm and less cost.....but with your lenses not seeing ...