CxP

Joined on Jul 16, 2019

Comments

Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

winkalman: That's a handsome little bugger. If the GR IIIx gets the same treatment, I'd love to have one.

I agree, it looks nice!

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2023 at 19:13 UTC
On article DPReview TV: Panasonic S5 II Review (108 comments in total)

Ok am I not getting enough sleep or is there a subtle wavy/warpy look to the video when they're just holding it still on the subject. Anyone else see it?

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2023 at 05:58 UTC as 12th comment
On article Apple's iPhone 14 and 14 Pro: Imaging tech examined (180 comments in total)
In reply to:

tkbslc: The focal lengths are moving in the wrong direction. 24 is not a great all-around focal length. 26mm from last few years was already too wide. 13mm is way too wide as well. Hardly anyone can compose well with that focal length.

I think most people would prefer something like 21mm for the wide angle, 35mm for the main and 85mm for the tele. That's a classic photography kit. 21mm perfect for interiors and group shots. 35mm perfect for all-around. 85mm is the classic portrait prime for a reason.

I don't think very many typical photographers are going to choose a 3 prime setup that is 13mm, 24mm and 77mm.

Or at the very least go back to the 30mm equiv for the main camera like we had on the iPhone 5/s

I agree, I don't like the focal lengths. The main camera is ridiculously wide, I'm not sure why Apple is going this way. Perhaps it's to accommodate video. But I would be quite ok going back to the 30mm days of yore.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2022 at 01:59 UTC
On article What's the best way to describe sensor size? (598 comments in total)

I think I would suggest the length of the long edge. Easiest to picture and talk about. Of course you also need to know either aspect ratio or width for the complete picture, but for quick classification and compact notation I like long edge.

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2022 at 21:06 UTC as 37th comment

Phenomenal picture!

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2022 at 06:22 UTC as 5th comment
On article Hands-on with the OM System OM-1 (390 comments in total)
In reply to:

rialcnis: I had the original OM-1 film camera. It was broken by SHAMU the killer whale.

Then I have the OMD EM5 which I love...

No way I can resist this new OM-1

Haha ok thank you!

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2022 at 19:27 UTC
On article These are the cameras people complain about the most (136 comments in total)

How can the Airpods Max be most complained about in Spain? Like, two people have them. (I'm not dissing the headphones, just sayin.)

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2022 at 20:01 UTC as 45th comment | 3 replies
On article Hands-on with the OM System OM-1 (390 comments in total)
In reply to:

rialcnis: I had the original OM-1 film camera. It was broken by SHAMU the killer whale.

Then I have the OMD EM5 which I love...

No way I can resist this new OM-1

Uhh surely you must tell us that story!

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2022 at 20:22 UTC

The pictures look good to me. It doesn't have the overcooked/artificial look that phones have these days.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2021 at 02:24 UTC as 20th comment
In reply to:

CxP: THIS IS COMPLETELY WRONG YOU ID--oh wait you're right.

Basically what I tell people about low light performance is it depends on sensor size and what year the camera came out. :)

Great video!

Nice!

Link | Posted on Aug 19, 2021 at 02:46 UTC
In reply to:

Indohydra: Finally. This has been my experience for years. Excellent. Useful. Honest.

The next big bug-a-boo, I believe, is the value of high pixels in handheld photography.

I'd be interested in looking at that.

Link | Posted on Aug 14, 2021 at 23:13 UTC

THIS IS COMPLETELY WRONG YOU ID--oh wait you're right.

Basically what I tell people about low light performance is it depends on sensor size and what year the camera came out. :)

Great video!

Link | Posted on Aug 14, 2021 at 21:19 UTC as 122nd comment | 2 replies

Beautiful gallery!

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2020 at 18:30 UTC as 69th comment

Wow! Welcome aboard!

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2020 at 05:20 UTC as 32nd comment
On article Samyang has released its own lens simulator web app (75 comments in total)
In reply to:

boarderphreak: Worst app ever. Not only is the functionality limited, switching between formats doesn't change the DoF either. And that's not to mention the poor subject and background images and overall look.

30 likes for GRUBERND's erroneous comment. It's 2020, you'd think people would have this figured out by now! We're still going to be debating this in 2030, aren't we...

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2020 at 18:23 UTC
In reply to:

Damien Demolder: Is anyone here in the market for an anamorphic lens, whether this one or any other?

I wasn't, but I'd be lying if I said this didn't tickle the ol' GAS nerve.

Link | Posted on Aug 11, 2020 at 21:20 UTC
In reply to:

CxP: I'd like to see a 17-25/2.0 or thereabouts. I think it'd be a good people-shooting lens.

I think limiting to 17-25 would shed some extra weight. :) I don't need 10mm when shooting people. But good on Panasonic for exploring this range at this aperture.

Link | Posted on Nov 28, 2019 at 02:10 UTC

I'd like to see a 17-25/2.0 or thereabouts. I think it'd be a good people-shooting lens.

Link | Posted on Nov 27, 2019 at 23:12 UTC as 20th comment | 3 replies
On article DPReview TV: Sony a7R IV Review (413 comments in total)

Thank you for not obliterating the skin texture in the gallery! :)

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2019 at 20:19 UTC as 23rd comment

Does it work both when wide open and stopped down?

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2019 at 22:59 UTC as 43rd comment | 1 reply
Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »