Reading mode:
Light
Dark
CxP
Joined on
Jul 16, 2019
|
Latest reviews
Finished challenges
Most popular cameras
Features
Top threads
winkalman: That's a handsome little bugger. If the GR IIIx gets the same treatment, I'd love to have one.
I agree, it looks nice!
Ok am I not getting enough sleep or is there a subtle wavy/warpy look to the video when they're just holding it still on the subject. Anyone else see it?
tkbslc: The focal lengths are moving in the wrong direction. 24 is not a great all-around focal length. 26mm from last few years was already too wide. 13mm is way too wide as well. Hardly anyone can compose well with that focal length.
I think most people would prefer something like 21mm for the wide angle, 35mm for the main and 85mm for the tele. That's a classic photography kit. 21mm perfect for interiors and group shots. 35mm perfect for all-around. 85mm is the classic portrait prime for a reason.
I don't think very many typical photographers are going to choose a 3 prime setup that is 13mm, 24mm and 77mm.
Or at the very least go back to the 30mm equiv for the main camera like we had on the iPhone 5/s
I agree, I don't like the focal lengths. The main camera is ridiculously wide, I'm not sure why Apple is going this way. Perhaps it's to accommodate video. But I would be quite ok going back to the 30mm days of yore.
I think I would suggest the length of the long edge. Easiest to picture and talk about. Of course you also need to know either aspect ratio or width for the complete picture, but for quick classification and compact notation I like long edge.
Phenomenal picture!
rialcnis: I had the original OM-1 film camera. It was broken by SHAMU the killer whale.
Then I have the OMD EM5 which I love...
No way I can resist this new OM-1
Haha ok thank you!
How can the Airpods Max be most complained about in Spain? Like, two people have them. (I'm not dissing the headphones, just sayin.)
rialcnis: I had the original OM-1 film camera. It was broken by SHAMU the killer whale.
Then I have the OMD EM5 which I love...
No way I can resist this new OM-1
Uhh surely you must tell us that story!
The pictures look good to me. It doesn't have the overcooked/artificial look that phones have these days.
CxP: THIS IS COMPLETELY WRONG YOU ID--oh wait you're right.
Basically what I tell people about low light performance is it depends on sensor size and what year the camera came out. :)
Great video!
Nice!
Indohydra: Finally. This has been my experience for years. Excellent. Useful. Honest.
The next big bug-a-boo, I believe, is the value of high pixels in handheld photography.
I'd be interested in looking at that.
THIS IS COMPLETELY WRONG YOU ID--oh wait you're right.
Basically what I tell people about low light performance is it depends on sensor size and what year the camera came out. :)
Great video!
Beautiful gallery!
Wow! Welcome aboard!
boarderphreak: Worst app ever. Not only is the functionality limited, switching between formats doesn't change the DoF either. And that's not to mention the poor subject and background images and overall look.
30 likes for GRUBERND's erroneous comment. It's 2020, you'd think people would have this figured out by now! We're still going to be debating this in 2030, aren't we...
Damien Demolder: Is anyone here in the market for an anamorphic lens, whether this one or any other?
I wasn't, but I'd be lying if I said this didn't tickle the ol' GAS nerve.
CxP: I'd like to see a 17-25/2.0 or thereabouts. I think it'd be a good people-shooting lens.
I think limiting to 17-25 would shed some extra weight. :) I don't need 10mm when shooting people. But good on Panasonic for exploring this range at this aperture.
I'd like to see a 17-25/2.0 or thereabouts. I think it'd be a good people-shooting lens.
Thank you for not obliterating the skin texture in the gallery! :)
Does it work both when wide open and stopped down?