Joined on Aug 11, 2012


Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12
In reply to:

67gtonr: It seems to me that the Canon EOS M with its 22 f/2.0 lens would be better, it's roughly the same size with a better sensor, better screen, better built, providing better image quality and unlimited expansion possibilities, and it costs less!

Are you trying to create "the most replied post"?

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2013 at 14:48 UTC
In reply to:

HawaiiVolcanoes: Casio....ditch the Casio name....maybe in Japan it means something...but here it is synonymous with Cheap Junk

Cheap junk? Do you have any evidence for your hypotheses?

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2013 at 03:05 UTC
In reply to:

Kwick1: Am I the only one that absolutely hates the new test scenes? So dark, drab. Tough to find areas to compare easily.

I miss the globe.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2013 at 07:21 UTC
On article Nikon Coolpix A comparative review (18 comments in total)

That price!

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2013 at 12:03 UTC as 13th comment
On article Sony DSC-F707 Review (6 comments in total)

Arguably, still, a cool camera!

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2013 at 11:11 UTC as 5th comment
On article Welcome to our studio test scene (272 comments in total)

I am going to miss the globe from the old studio test.

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2013 at 20:06 UTC as 83rd comment | 1 reply
On article Leica announces X Vario zoom compact with APS-C sensor (755 comments in total)

I don't understand one thing. How can they call this camera compact?

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2013 at 17:23 UTC as 229th comment | 1 reply
On article Just Posted: Our Nikon Coolpix A review (338 comments in total)
In reply to:

ryansholl: *Obligatory bitching about not having reviewed some other camera*


I have to admit, one of the best "obligatory bitching comments" up here ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2013 at 17:56 UTC
On article A sneak peek at our forthcoming camera test scene (320 comments in total)

no, the globe is gone :(

Link | Posted on Oct 10, 2012 at 23:53 UTC as 52nd comment | 1 reply
On article Nokia Lumia 920 promises PureView, but it’s no 808 (182 comments in total)

Why would they not include the "real" pureview sensor? Seems like a huge mistake in my opinion.

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2012 at 02:46 UTC as 29th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

ThePhilips: DPR, please confirm whether the thing has mic/speakers or not.

At least in the pictures I do not see mic.

OK, but that's not important. My main question: can an app written for the camera take shot as a RAW image?

Not always. Look at Nokia/AMD's marketing department.

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2012 at 08:34 UTC

I have nothing against Samsung but no matter how "smart" this camera is the horrible IQ doesn't justify the price tag and size. Must be smoking something if you think the image quality is acceptable for this group of cameras.

Link | Posted on Aug 15, 2012 at 08:56 UTC as 23rd comment
Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12