Rodrigo Pasiani
Lives in
São Paulo, Brazil
Joined on
Jul 17, 2019
About me:
Instagram: @rodrigo_pasiani YouTube: Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/rodrigo_pc/albums/72157697391983321 |
Comments
 |  |  |  |
| Calm Lake by Kreber from Something new.. | Azure Kingfisher by ruley74 from A big year - birds 2021 | Janiskoski by Kaappo from My best photo of the week. | Steam Season by cjf2 from Mamiya C330 challenge |
This lens is capable of producing unique images. Great video.
EXkurogane: I already own both dslr and mirrorless cameras. I guess my next purchase will be a satellite.
I'm selling mine on ebay in "mint condition".
Retzius: Pentax is using this to search for its last remaining users...
Funniest comment for a while.
Very interesting, thanks for sharing the wisdom.
$40M?? I bet it's Leica. (Just joking, great article)
Awesome review, Jordan.
tedolf: Now this is interesting. It's basically a 100mm f2.8 lens on a four thirds sensor, that only uses the central part of the image circle. That would be a very nice portrait lens at that price.
Hmmmm........
Tedolph
F/2.4 actually.
Paul Graber: A list very biased towards Americans. Aren't there good photographers anywhere else?
I recommend Brazilian nature photographer Araquém Alcântara. 50 years photographing Brazilian wildlife, landscape and people.
Magnar W: The best lens is the one that fits the mount of your camera ... the differences between the lenses doesn't mean much for what you can do with them.
For sport, action and other kind of fast moving subject, I would look at tracking ability, more than differences that just can be seen at pixel peeping level. A tad more sharpness, but out of focus results, doesn't seem much helpful.
So please keep doing that. Have a good weekend.
Magnar W: The best lens is the one that fits the mount of your camera ... the differences between the lenses doesn't mean much for what you can do with them.
For sport, action and other kind of fast moving subject, I would look at tracking ability, more than differences that just can be seen at pixel peeping level. A tad more sharpness, but out of focus results, doesn't seem much helpful.
Are you a real photographer? Why are you commenting here? I fully agree, actually. These comparison videos are nice, but in reality the sharpness difference is irrelevant.
Great article. I can't wait for part 2.
gphome: What's a DSLR?
A tool for professional photographers.
The landing precision is out of this world (pun intended).
NZ Scott: Smart of Nikon to use the same body for three cameras.
A great way to keep the cost down!
Having different bodies is useful to justify a wider price range. It's a marketing decision. As customer, I appreciate what Nikon did.
Great video indeed.
Vit Adamek: I don't want to nit pick but that tiger winner photo has really distastefully brought up shadows and blacks in the background, for this overly HDR look alike.
I agree, deeper shadows would make the image more dramatic. I love the composition though.
Imager of: I just don’t know who would buy these?
Me, a Z6II with 24-200 mm coming from a Sony RX10.
More MegaPixels: With COVID-19 it likely has been difficult for camera companies to work on new cameras. No doubt it trimmed back what was planned for this new model.
These new models still need to be released before the holiday buying season, so this is what we get.
I bet this model was designed before the COVID. Developing a camera takes time: marketing research, concept, design, simulation, redesign, tests, industrialization.
Very interesting.
David610: The good point appears to be that the minimum focus distance is 0.5m at wide-angle & 1.0m at telephoto. However, the lens remains big and heavy. The Canon R equivalent is nearly three inches shorter and quite a bit lighter.
At first glance, what Canon did with their RF 70-200 made all the other 70-200 look obsolete. I'm sure this is a great professional tool though.