AndreyBess

I think it is a good start-up idea: build an external two cards adapter connected. And add software support via ML.

Why not to Z6?
I am using Canon and now going to Nikon or Sony.
R without IBIS just has RIPed for me.

I was waiting for IBIS, There are so many great lenses (like from Carl Zeiss) without it but with f1.4. And some IS is must have.
I'v used Canon since 2001. And now I am going to Nikon Z6 or Sony...

They'd said that some scratches or even dust on a front elements do not affect picture. Not the case for rear elements.
So, now with the REAR filters, what are we going to get?! I do not keep my...

$99

Agree.
Yet, from all the 6, I would go with IV.
It has all I need except Microphone port which I do need.

Will you take the camera with you on a riding on a swimming banana? I would not. Yet Sony RX 100 (Mk1 in my case) serves me just great in such cases.
They same for lot of other cases where size is...

I use my Mk1 for 4 years. I like it. Ergonomics is good (I use Canon DSLR as well). It is handy to have a good camera in your pocket ( in case you can use it in the right way).

I use Canon 600D and Sony RX 100 (Mk1). I am Ok with Sony's ergonomics. I like it even more that Canon's. Of course, I configured it for my needs.

As of all the versions, I would go with Mk4. Yet,...

Thanks!

2.8 - not actual 2.8. It is 5.6 in fact from the light perspective.

I have Sony RX-100 (the original one) and Canon 600D.
Even this Sony works for me in good light only. The new one would not work at all.

Photography is all about light.
This lens is too dark.

I use High Pass as well (yet, not for 100% of photos).
I am not a pro. Do editing just for my family photos.

Here is my approach for this filter usage:
1) New composed layer (optional: make it as...

I think that the idea is they are able to see that he is suspicious. He is trying to fake cameras with his white cap. Take a look at the picture on the left. It is not possible to identify that he...

Бред

The problem with wedding photography is described in a great set of articles several years ago: http://strravaganza.livejournal.com/38948.html (please translate to your language using web-browser's...

Agree. They are good (some of them) as photos. As photo for portfolio.
Yet, as a wedding memory for a couple in love - no.

For a usual, not pro, user, 600D's ISO 3200 is OK. Use 3200 and shot in RAW. Postprocessing helps to make very good pictures.

Re-tested. It is fast.