sebasantos

Joined on Jan 22, 2016

Comments

Total: 15, showing: 1 – 15
On article Canon announces budget-friendly EOS Rebel T6 (1300D) (848 comments in total)

I think that some gear geeks are very nervous with the new on chip ADC sensor from canon and they have to bash every canon announcement.

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2016 at 16:39 UTC as 126th comment | 8 replies
In reply to:

jthommo101: I had this lens but sold it; it was simply not as sharp at 400mm as the venerable 400/5.6. Not up to the mark for serious birding, I'm afraid.

I don't know every user, of course, but this seems one of the few cases when people prefer the 400/5.6 over the 100-400mkII. The 100-400mkII is more flexible in a lots of aspects and it is better in many aspect too, also is expensive. And sharpness I think are almost equal. Maybe you have a bad version. The story of primes sharpness being way better tha zoom is dissapering. The news zoom lenses (like this 100-400mkII and 16-35/4L for example) prove that.

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2016 at 15:49 UTC
In reply to:

FantasticMrFox: First thought: "Wait, I read about the 'new' Canon 100-400 quite some time ago. Is there another version now?!"

Then the realisation that no, there isn't. This lens has been out for about 1.5 years now, why even bother with a review?

The Mk I was 15 years on the market. This is going to be a long time too.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 18:26 UTC
On article Newly enthused: hands on with the Canon EOS 80D (677 comments in total)
In reply to:

sebasantos: It is really a lie that most canon users are changing their cameras for other brands. The most of the users get what they want with their canon systems and they know that maybe nikon and sony camera are a little better now, but market changes quickly. And the difference between cameras of different brands and same price level are really few things and almost meaningless. According to some trolls, It seems that sony and nikon cameras are the only which do excellent images. Look at 1x.com, 500px.com, juzaphotos, etc, look what cameras and lenses they used, and you will see excellent pictures taked with all kind of cameras and lenses. And this is not the most important thing that a camera must do??

@BigOne = trroooooolllllllll (Only you have to read the messages of this "character" to know)

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 16:56 UTC
On article Newly enthused: hands on with the Canon EOS 80D (677 comments in total)

It is really a lie that most canon users are changing their cameras for other brands. The most of the users get what they want with their canon systems and they know that maybe nikon and sony camera are a little better now, but market changes quickly. And the difference between cameras of different brands and same price level are really few things and almost meaningless. According to some trolls, It seems that sony and nikon cameras are the only which do excellent images. Look at 1x.com, 500px.com, juzaphotos, etc, look what cameras and lenses they used, and you will see excellent pictures taked with all kind of cameras and lenses. And this is not the most important thing that a camera must do??

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 22:07 UTC as 61st comment | 3 replies
On article Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)
In reply to:

chillgreg: Not even a single mention over at Ren Kockwell... (don't go!)

Apparently between multiple orgasms over the new 80D and counting the $10K/week he pulls ("please help K R") there's not much time for Pentax...

If somebody talk beautiful things about something that you like/own/prefer, their websites are wonderful. If somebody doesn't talk about something or say that other things are better, they do it for the money and people do't have to go to their websites, because they do it for the money. Curious....

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 21:54 UTC
On article Newly enthused: hands on with the Canon EOS 80D (677 comments in total)

I think that for most people, there should be only one camera. This camera must have all the best features and it also should be cheap. For example, most of the people won't use 4k (even most of them don't shoot video), but they need that all cameras have 4k only because if they buy a camera, it has to be the best of the best. This is only one example of the hundreds of features a camera can have.
Meanwhile, camera brands know what to do and they show every year with million of dollars in profit. And in the case of canon, they were the best sellers in Japan last year, so i think that they know what they are doing.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 20:32 UTC as 71st comment
On article Newly enthused: hands on with the Canon EOS 80D (677 comments in total)
In reply to:

dennis tennis: 80D is not for me, therefore it must suck for everybody else. This is DPR forum logic folks.

That's the point. If they have another camera or brand, they need to bash everything else. A psychologist call this "insecurity".

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 20:21 UTC
On article X-Factor: Canon's EOS-1D X Mark II examined in-depth (575 comments in total)
In reply to:

sebasantos: Hello, I have a Canon 5D Mark III and I have focus peaking, zebras and lots of features that sony users say that canon are missing. And also my 5DIII has 14 stops dynamic range. It's free and easy to have those features. I don't use it for video, but there are also a lot of features for video like RAW video, etc, etc, etc.
I am not going to buy this camera, I don't need it but i am very interested in the sensor performance, because I hope that 5DIV is in its way and use the new sensor technology. If the 5DS sensor without the new technology close the gap between sensors, I think that the new sensor could be a very good surprise. The patent for this new sensor was introduced in 2014, so they were working in it for a long period of years.

Thousands of user use magic lantern without any problem. There is some points to consider but it is extremely secure (it is a software not a firmware upgrade). About vertical resolution, it is unnoticiable. The same with moire and aliasing. 99% of the pictures with dual iso are perfect. The only thing that could bother it is the fact that the picture in the lcd screen of the camera doesn't look right. But there is an option that automatically the camera took two pictures, one with dual iso and the other without, so you can chech focus and other things. About frying the camera, it is something that they must say to avoid any problem, but thousands of users could teel that there is no problem.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 15:40 UTC
On article X-Factor: Canon's EOS-1D X Mark II examined in-depth (575 comments in total)
In reply to:

1DXMARKII: Anything about dynamic range and high iso?

We'll appreciate for this.
Dynamic range
New focusing system

Performance at low iso(100) high iso(6400) extreme iso(51200)

Comparison with the predessor ,1dx

Yes, it is a improve in a lot of aspects, nevertheless we have to wait to see this new sensor in real photography. But it seems that other brand users are very nervous and the only little aspect that they have in their favour is going to dissapear.

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2016 at 14:57 UTC
On article X-Factor: Canon's EOS-1D X Mark II examined in-depth (575 comments in total)
In reply to:

sebasantos: Hello, I have a Canon 5D Mark III and I have focus peaking, zebras and lots of features that sony users say that canon are missing. And also my 5DIII has 14 stops dynamic range. It's free and easy to have those features. I don't use it for video, but there are also a lot of features for video like RAW video, etc, etc, etc.
I am not going to buy this camera, I don't need it but i am very interested in the sensor performance, because I hope that 5DIV is in its way and use the new sensor technology. If the 5DS sensor without the new technology close the gap between sensors, I think that the new sensor could be a very good surprise. The patent for this new sensor was introduced in 2014, so they were working in it for a long period of years.

I have replied to @Biggs23 with arguments but it seems that the moderator left "against canon" messages but not allow to reply this rude and meaningless message. There are hounded of photography web sites, so, good bye and so long!

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2016 at 14:49 UTC
In reply to:

scrup: Cmon guys the A6300 has more comments than Canons flagship. Lets buff this post more so it looks competitive.

I am seeing in a few months a lot of sport photographer behind the lines with the sony a6300. Its the best camera ever made and it works for everything

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2016 at 14:38 UTC
On article X-Factor: Canon's EOS-1D X Mark II examined in-depth (575 comments in total)
In reply to:

Don Sata: This camera's main feature article comments seem to be stagnated around the 500 mark. The X-Pro2 got more than 1,300 and it's not even noon of it's first day and Sony's new 6300 has about 300 already.

I believe this is quite telling of the interest a camera like this or Nikon's (400 comments) generate.

There were three articles at almost the same time of this camera. If you sum all the comments, there are 1000 comments about this camera, which it is a very pro camera for a very limited segment of users. DSLR has life for many many years. Mirroless cameras are getting better and better, but they need a few more years. When lenses, ergonomics and performance for a mirroless matches the ones for a DSLR I will consider change systems.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 21:57 UTC
On article X-Factor: Canon's EOS-1D X Mark II examined in-depth (575 comments in total)

Hello, I have a Canon 5D Mark III and I have focus peaking, zebras and lots of features that sony users say that canon are missing. And also my 5DIII has 14 stops dynamic range. It's free and easy to have those features. I don't use it for video, but there are also a lot of features for video like RAW video, etc, etc, etc.
I am not going to buy this camera, I don't need it but i am very interested in the sensor performance, because I hope that 5DIV is in its way and use the new sensor technology. If the 5DS sensor without the new technology close the gap between sensors, I think that the new sensor could be a very good surprise. The patent for this new sensor was introduced in 2014, so they were working in it for a long period of years.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 20:19 UTC as 28th comment | 14 replies
On article Canon EOS 5D Mark III Review (29 comments in total)

Hello. I know that it will be time consuming, but i would really like to see a review of this camera with Magic Lantern features and improves (Dual Iso for example). Thank you very much in advance.

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2016 at 16:57 UTC as 4th comment
Total: 15, showing: 1 – 15