danm_cool

I have compared my LX10/15 with a RX100 IV of a friend; for high iso, it depends a lot of textures, some pictures are much better with the Panasonic, but in general the results are very similar ...

size is smaller, that's a fact, also the number of megapixels is smaller... too bad! that's a fact as well, it has not the sharpest lens unfortunately original poster compared with a camera using a ...

Facts are facts, LX100 2 is a lousy camera, based on a m43 sensor, only a part of the sensor is used to create the picture, what a waste! a chunky body, a soft lens and too few megapixels... it ...

Many posters here are praising for their cameras :) Simply don't bother too much, make your own opinion. All the tests that I had seen over the web, the results at 125 iso are similar from the ...

No, the G7X has much worse lens than the Panasonic, I had them both and compared, the Canon has much bigger dark areas in the corners, the lens is not projecting light at all, also lens is much ...

@The Lotus Eater 50mm 1.4 af from samtang is a gem for the money, my sample had excellent sharpness in center wide open, and amazing bokeh, especially good at subject distances longer than 2 meters...

the 55mm zeiss has an ugly bokeh, check the samyang 45mm 1.8 or the samyang 50mm 1.4 af, much better lenses for the price!

That's strange, are you sure you had put the right settings? I find this camera really shining in low light and giving amazing bokeh despite such a small camera. I have attached a pic at ISO 8000, ...

Put your camera in shutter priority!

I had tested also the Canon G7X II, and send it back, AF is much slower than the LX15, lens is less sharp at wide angle in corners, no 4K video, automatic white balance is too cold (blue) when ...

ISO noise reduction on the LX10 is very smart, depending on the type of the material or surface, it will change the algorithm, I have tested side by side with the sony, it does better, the rx100 ...

Don't see your point, the LX10 has a sharper lens than the RX100 IV, also the AF is much faster, I had tested both and kept the Panasonic. The LX5 is outdated, image is much less detailed than with ...

It doesn't! Impossible to use portrait focal length indoors equals no portrait at home, lousy images with less fine details than 20mp of LX10 despite 40mp, slower main lens f/1.6 vs f/1.4, etc.

I have forgotten the zoom lens indeed, but unfortunately huawei does not provide all-in-one quality thay I would like to see: - the 40mp camera is only for wide angle... - zoom lens uses a low ...

Smartphones have poor iso capabilities (night photos) and poor details (when zoom into a photo), but today all of them produce reasonable quality images. Though, for me, the biggest downside of ...

This camera has a sharp lens, sharper than the RX100 IV and GX7 II, it is faster to autofocus than the other 2, I was lucky, my two samples were great, no need to return them (I had bought a ...

If I put a DJI mini, an osmo or equivalent and a go pro 8 together, I get the same weight and same price, hence I do not understand this product...

Indeed, it does 3 things and none of them perfectly:
- heavy personal camera
- bulky action cam
- fiddling drone with unfoldable legs

In my opinion, people who are pixel peeping usually do not have enough time to take great photos! This lens has same sharpness or better than pro lenses launched 10 years ago, does that mean that ...

It might depend on sample dispersion, I had 2 samples, the 2nd one was outstanding in center on a A7III, on par or better than the 24-105mm, only the corners were lagging behind. Now there's ...