teddoman

Good point on video since they're probably not applying any processing to the video. Google certainly has enough frames recorded to do HDR and do handheld pixel shift even on the video if it wanted...

To be fair, your old Canon probably had much better dynamic range but Google gives you HDR by default so it probably just felt that way

Actually a bayer filtered photo is fake and a handheld pixel shifted photo is more real

It's on the main news page "Fujifilm X-T3's video lives up to impressive specifications"

Impressive. Too bad handheld pixel shift only works on zoomed images.

Interesting idea, but that'd also make having a proprietary lens mount anti-competitive. If Nikon and Canon are not required to make their bodies compatible for Sigma lenses, Sony probably isn't ...

It looks like Pentax only implement handheld PS this year in the K-1 mark II. So I guess you could say that the technology has existed in a slow offline process (PhotoAcute) for a while but...

Rob- since the Pixel 3 has just come out and you're talking about "looking back," what phone are you talking about?

Interesting if it's already being done. Surprised I've never read about this before. Pentax is a bit niche and doesn't always attract the attention it apparently deserves. You'd think more people...

I suppose Google's know how is the entire point of why this is innovative. They're the only ones who can do handheld pixel shift right now.

Those require a tripod.

I'm not sure I understand why this is zoom-related. Are they only doing this on zoomed-in photos in order to match the detail of regular non-zoom photos? Is there any reason this isn't or can't be...

There's no handheld pixel shift yet. There's only tripod pixel shift.

Wow, so is this the first camera to offer smaller H.265 files since the 2014 Samsung NX1?

Is this considered a full frame? The grip looks a bit small for me, but I can see why people are talking about this mount.

I didn't realize that's how Google is doing it. So Google is constantly shooting a series of, say, 5 MB photos and keeping them in the memory buffer only? Then camera manufacturers could do this ...

I thought the Pixel 3 announcements were pretty neat too. It occurred to me that there might be practical issues with implementing this in large sensor cameras. First it'd really only work for ...

Keeping up with new bodies and firmware changes probably requires staff time which might not seem worth it.

Brutal isn't the right word, now that Canikon are in the game. More of a planned transition with continuing support for the legacy system.

Just realized that 2 of the 3 manufacturers in the L mount alliance are family-owned, Sigma and Leica