miric

miric

Joined on Jan 9, 2013

Comments

Total: 81, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Hands-on with the Canon EOS 77D (438 comments in total)
In reply to:

paulfulper: No more mirror cameras , there is no reason whatsoever to use mirror with digital , it makes cameras giant and obsolete .... and more expensive.

Yup as well as mirrorless GM Sony lenses. They're so compact and light-weight.

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 08:08 UTC
In reply to:

villagranvicent: $1000 less than the new Leica M10 body.

Stop evaluating Leica M cam as just one more digital cam. Don't ask me why.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 19:18 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: Olympus E-10 (160 comments in total)
In reply to:

miric: Looks so ugly these days.

OK, today's presented Pentax KP looks less ugly than this one.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 10:29 UTC
On article Hands-on with Ricoh's compact Pentax KP (632 comments in total)
In reply to:

miric: Does it include a wood handle to become a hammer? Looks ugly.

Yup, though some of them I don't like since I've seen their body ;)

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 10:27 UTC
On article Leica Boss: Hands-on with new Leica M10 (168 comments in total)
In reply to:

cdembrey: Leica's Barnack cameras were small. They have been porking-out since the M3. With todays technology they could build a Leica III size camera with a laser rangefinder (that would stay in adjustment).

Well. I'm about size as well. Everybody wanted small, compact and light-weight MILCs. So everybody got them. Me as well after Canon 5DM2. Fujifilm X-E2 is the pretty compact and lightweight cam with its aluminum lenses. But is it possible to make shots with 35mm lens (50mm equv. to 135 format) on 1/40 and slower with mechanical (not electronical) shutter? The answer is 'hardly'. Same time Leica M9 with its size and brass caps, paired with a bit more weighty lenses makes such kind of shooting much less problematic.

About Leica's rangefinder. I had one some time ago in my real estate business. Very good and precise tool. I was blown away with an approach how they solved a switcher of a measuring leverage inside - optically! Such a passionate company in an optics! But it had visible laser spot BTW harmful for eyes and had some issues with in bright light conditions. I don't think it's a suitable idea for RF cam.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 07:57 UTC
In reply to:

Nick Brundle - Photography: Absolute madness that this costs $6.595.00

What a reason to discuss Leica's M prices? It is well-known thing due to many factors. So why to show own 'intelligence' writing about so called madness? @Nick Brundle, what do you think sir?

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 07:45 UTC
In reply to:

villagranvicent: $1000 less than the new Leica M10 body.

Why compare Leica and Canikon in any department? Definitely useless point.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 07:42 UTC
On article Hands-on with Ricoh's compact Pentax KP (632 comments in total)
In reply to:

miric: Does it include a wood handle to become a hammer? Looks ugly.

I saw many cams and those shots are enough to make an opinion about its design. I definitely won't buy this cam as a potential customer despite specs.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 07:39 UTC
On article Hands-on with Ricoh's compact Pentax KP (632 comments in total)

Does it include a wood handle to become a hammer? Looks ugly.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 07:33 UTC as 103rd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Zoron: Now X70 is definitely outdated.

And its upgrade as well?

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 06:55 UTC
In reply to:

wed7: According to the official release it has weather sealing?

Nope.

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 06:55 UTC
In reply to:

villagranvicent: $1000 less than the new Leica M10 body.

Why? Almost equal.

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 06:50 UTC
On article Feisty upstart: Hands-on with the Fujifilm X-T20 (341 comments in total)
In reply to:

Akpinxit: Really good looking camera .

The ugliest camera in the whole X series. All others are OK.

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 06:46 UTC
On article F is for '4th': Hands-on with Fujifilm X100F (421 comments in total)
In reply to:

ekaton: Nice. Wondering how the lens holds up to the new sensor.

I suppose the lens as dull as all its prevoius gens.

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 06:43 UTC
On article F is for '4th': Hands-on with Fujifilm X100F (421 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zoron: Pls upgrade X70 .

Why not to upgrade the upgrade of the upgrade of X70 as well to prevent moans for a while?

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 06:43 UTC
In reply to:

mick232: What is the Leica effect? Expensive camera so the picture must be good?

Most silly way of thinking.

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 06:38 UTC
On article Leica Boss: Hands-on with new Leica M10 (168 comments in total)
In reply to:

cdembrey: Leica's Barnack cameras were small. They have been porking-out since the M3. With todays technology they could build a Leica III size camera with a laser rangefinder (that would stay in adjustment).

IMHO Leica III cams look like a crap, I don't understand their beauty. Same time all M series cams look handsome. Laser rangefinder? Oh really? Do you imagine a way of use it on Leica? Have you ever used a regular laser rangefinger on a bright sunny day?

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 06:35 UTC
On article Video: Leica M10 First Look (17 comments in total)
In reply to:

Infared: No thanks. I will keep my poor-man's Leica. My PEN-F is much smaller, has AF, and great glass choices and, eh'hem....is way better looking, too! :-)

Keep us informed please.

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 06:21 UTC
In reply to:

Nick Brundle - Photography: Absolute madness that this costs $6.595.00

Oh really? Just pass through...

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2017 at 20:58 UTC

Don't understand why T2 looks really silver but Pro2 looks like photoshoped black one?

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2017 at 10:36 UTC as 23rd comment
Total: 81, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »