miric

Joined on Jan 9, 2013

Comments

Total: 39, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

photomedium: I rather get a D5 with a sigma 50/1.4.

>>>I rather get a D5 with a sigma 50/1.4.

You could buy even much more booze or a good stuff to see this world bright. What a stupid comparison?

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2016 at 07:56 UTC
On article Faster flagship: Hands-on with the Fujifilm X-T2 (123 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cheezr: Please tell the Fuji Mgt that they really need tilt/touch screens on their viewfinder style cameras. They are obviously capable of engineering a screen that that does not take up extra space and it makes the camera much more flexible. If some people don't like touch/tilt screens they don't have to make use of the feature but I for one am not using my Fuji for macro (for ex.) because I will not lie on the ground just because they are too stubborn to acknowledge that a lot of people like the viewfinder styling and also want the usability of a tilt screen.
Also a WR version of the 18-55 would be nice.

Thanks

No they don't.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 07:32 UTC
On article Hasselblad to announce 'game changer' next week (456 comments in total)

Yup. We already have a couple of game changers by 'Blad — Lunar and Stellar. So why don't we have third one?

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2016 at 18:06 UTC as 92nd comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

NicoPPC: Multi-taskting depends of the OS. Only some special CPUs may not be able to properly allow it.

Any CPU can multi task, even Microchip PIC, Motorola 68k, etc..

AmigaOS using a 68000 at 7Mhz was one of the first real multimedia and multitask OS.

This is shut a PR b***t.

Fill free to turn downer mode off.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2016 at 09:50 UTC
In reply to:

FocusBogus: Is there any plans in the future to remove mirror and mechanical shutter from EOS EF cameras? Perhaps E-series after D-series? E = electronic shutter / electronic viewfinder

Just slow down your dreams about letters. Canon has pathetic mirrorless sub-system EF-M with the EOS M cam. D means digital, EF means electro focus.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 20:53 UTC
In reply to:

heypek: to me fuji-customers have to wait two years to get their fuji-camera complete with things other Producers had alredy done long time ago... think!

Why crappy "double croppy"?

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 14:29 UTC
In reply to:

heypek: to me fuji-customers have to wait two years to get their fuji-camera complete with things other Producers had alredy done long time ago... think!

Oh really? You think so much in wrong way. Stop it.

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 08:37 UTC
In reply to:

PKDanny: They should make AF lenses. Or. They are lazy!!

Autofocus for serious video production? Really? It's nice it hasn't.

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2016 at 17:35 UTC
In reply to:

ProfHankD: Why do they make the part that sticks nearest the sensor shiny metal?

This is ARRI PL-mount. I believe the mount itselt is pretty deep and that shiny part covered with so-called tube. The very end of it isn't shiny it seems.

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2016 at 17:33 UTC
On article Otherworldly? Lomography introduces Jupiter 3+ lens (163 comments in total)
In reply to:

Angrymagpie: Rich Russian heritage?

It's a bit iffy whenever a manufacturer has to include statements like this as a selling point.

They have to call and dedicate it in the name of Putler.

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2016 at 09:55 UTC
On article Otherworldly? Lomography introduces Jupiter 3+ lens (163 comments in total)
In reply to:

mw323: Rich Russian Heritage of reverse engineering and copying?
What's next, updated Zorki4?

Yeah, like the WWII personal victory of USSh iii tR.

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2016 at 09:54 UTC
On article Otherworldly? Lomography introduces Jupiter 3+ lens (163 comments in total)
In reply to:

miric: Lol, a piece of Russian сrap. Heritage? Yup, copy-pasted from Jena Sonnar with a piece of Soviet sh iiii t as always. It's better to buy second-hand C Sonnar.

@tom1234567 Sure. Had one piece of that сrap. And now have C Sonnar. It's better to buy original Jena Sonnar today.

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2016 at 09:53 UTC
On article Otherworldly? Lomography introduces Jupiter 3+ lens (163 comments in total)

Lol, a piece of Russian сrap. Heritage? Yup, copy-pasted from Jena Sonnar with a piece of Soviet sh iiii t as always. It's better to buy second-hand C Sonnar.

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 14:56 UTC as 55th comment | 3 replies
On article What's missing? Ming Thein on the state of mirrorless (748 comments in total)

Who is Ming Thein?

Link | Posted on Nov 9, 2015 at 08:48 UTC as 36th comment | 1 reply

Zhong...what?

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2015 at 20:40 UTC as 38th comment | 3 replies

Thanks god I've sold out all of Canon's gear after 10 years using. This race isn't interesting for me anymore :)

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2015 at 06:35 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

dansclic: sony should ask Leica how to build small lenses coupled with good sensors....
why is it not possible to have M mount sized lenses on sony cameras ? is it a question of sensor design ? why such huge and heavy lenses ?

Oh really? So why MF Sony Loxias are so thick? Any clues?

Link | Posted on Aug 1, 2015 at 08:53 UTC
In reply to:

TheWhiteDog: From what I am hearing and seeing so far it still looks like Photo Ninja will be the way I have to go for developing Xtrans files for the foreseeable future. But it is very heartening that Adobe is working with Fuji on future improvements down the line.

Oh really? Everybody worries about correct X-Trans development and wow, that's it. RawTherapee is a solution. Lol.

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2015 at 06:12 UTC
On article Leica Q In-depth Review (1126 comments in total)

Oh Leica. Please do the same but no lens and M bayonet. I'll take for $3000.

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 08:22 UTC as 286th comment | 2 replies
On article Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on (712 comments in total)
In reply to:

skyfotos: I used film Leicas for many years but have never got used to the fatter feel of digital Leicas. I wish that they would slim the digital models down to the original film M3 size.

It's impossible now at least. A display + a sensor sandwich vs. thin film + back cover.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2015 at 12:10 UTC
Total: 39, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »