Bob in Baltimore

Bob in Baltimore

Lives in United States Baltimore, MD, United States
Works as a Retitred Rocket Scientist (Really)
Has a website at ScientiaPhoto.com
Joined on Oct 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10

Surely this is an April Fools joke. Somebody just submitted it 3 months early.

Link | Posted on Dec 23, 2019 at 13:53 UTC as 10th comment
On article Gift ideas for photographers with too much photo junk (52 comments in total)
In reply to:

Miike Dougherty: How do I re-purpose all my old filters. Many of them are 82mm. Some of them were way over $100. They are older and don't have all the modern coatings. That's why I have new ones. What a waste of money, especially all my extremely expensive "enhancing" filters. Don't need them with digital sensors.

Ear rings? And they could double as flattened disco balls under the right conditions. (It's all about the light.)

Link | Posted on Dec 23, 2019 at 13:35 UTC
In reply to:

cjb: I love my original CamRanger. I'll be looking at this.

FWIW, it's my opinion the value is not in the hardware, but in the software.

I have had the CamRanger 1 since it first come out. It is great when it works, but it crashed so often that I spent too much time reestablishing contact. I could not use it in a serious shoot. I am ready to buy the new CamRanger 2 as soon as I can find a review that addresses connectivity and stability. Have they solved their problems or not?

This is a small operation by a young creative entrepreneur. It's the type of operation that I'd like to support. It promises wonderful things.

So where are the reviews? I've found 3 or 4, but they seem more like vanity pieces than reviews. ("Like my video!")

Can anybody point me to a substantive review that addresses ease of use, connectivity and stability?

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2019 at 18:40 UTC
In reply to:

SeeRoy: Richly ironic.

Indeed it is richly ironic. But the irony was, I think, intentional.

He had a quality photograph taken by a pro with pro equipment. He copied it with his iPhone camera, thereby inserting a truly good photo into his piece, while maintaining the "purity" of an iPhone only piece.

The iPhone was able to faithfully recreate the depth of field, but only becasue it was in the object being shot!

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2013 at 15:04 UTC
On photo Tilly in the Grey Cats challenge (1 comment in total)

Not a grey cat as defined.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2010 at 15:42 UTC as 1st comment
On photo From Kitty City in the Grey Cats challenge (1 comment in total)

Not a grey cat as defined.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2010 at 15:42 UTC as 1st comment
On photo IMG_5396 in the Grey Cats challenge (1 comment in total)

Not a grey cat as defined.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2010 at 15:42 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Street Cats - Cyprus in the Grey Cats challenge (1 comment in total)

Not a grey cat as defined.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2010 at 15:41 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Take me home..... in the Grey Cats challenge (1 comment in total)

Not a grey cat as defined.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2010 at 15:35 UTC as 1st comment
Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10