mailman30

Joined on Jan 9, 2012

Comments

Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12
In reply to:

TheEngineer: What people forget is that they need to consider the price of this lens.

It's 2300$!

For this price it *has* to be great and tbh. I actuallyexpected it to be better.

This lens costs twice as much as the dslr version and over 3 times as much as the nikon dslr version.

Again, instead of creating a convincing portfolio to get the ball rolling and build a good mirrorless rep, Canon milks the market with overpriced products.

I did the exact same thing with my 50 1.2, sold it and bought the sigma 1.4. And the half stop difference is really insignificant

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2018 at 22:11 UTC

" the RX100 M6 is still a pretty reasonable size for an 8x travel zoom." Please stop using this term when describing the zoom capabilities of a camera as it is incredibly deceiving. 200mm is approximately 4x zoom (50mm being standard, or 1x). A camera that tops out at 200mm with 35mm at its widest would be considered 6x optical zoom but a camera that is 24mm at its widest and goes to 200mm is considered 8x optical zoom. You aren't getting more zoom but 8x sounds better. Just use the lens information, that is the most honest way, as in 24-200mm.

Link | Posted on Jun 27, 2018 at 16:03 UTC as 22nd comment
On article DJI Mavic Air: What you need to know (134 comments in total)

disappointing that the mavic air will do 100mbps where the mavic pro is at 60mbps. at least they could give you the option to film at 60mbps at 2.7k and 1080p

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2018 at 20:11 UTC as 26th comment | 1 reply

so what is a 63mm lens in 35mm terms with a sensor size of 43.8 × 32.9mm, as opposed to 24 x 36mm for 35mm?

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 16:29 UTC as 32nd comment | 13 replies
On article Canon EOS 7D Mark II Review (1302 comments in total)
In reply to:

erbtype: I have mixed feelings about the 7D II having used one a lot alongside a MkIV and 1DX.

- The AF is quick I'll give it that - easily on a par with the 1DX and slightly better in low light - but I've found in servo (AI) mode it doesn't lock on as well as either of the 1 series bodies I use, even when set to it's slowest point for tracking. In part I think this is down to it needing a degree of MFA on the 600mm lens I use, something the 1 series bodies have not needed, but I want to be confident in what I use and out of the box I just don't have that confidence with this body.

- The ISO noise is little better than the Mk IV.

- For resolving things at distance the MkIV is much better (as is the 1DX).

Your mileage may vary and I may have received a copy that needs some tweaking. I'm not saying the 7DII is a bad camera and it is an improvement on the original 7D, but I'm sticking with the MkIV and 1DX.

Thanks for your post! I was just going to ask if people thought it would be worth selling my 1d mkiv for this but your post has answered that question for me.

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2016 at 18:47 UTC
In reply to:

Digimat: well..at least that peripheral illumionation thing is not a new problem, my 5D3 produces some not so funny things when coupled with the 50 ART.

I've been shooting with that combination for ages without issues

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2016 at 19:17 UTC

What is the firmware number for this update? My lens has 1.02 and sigma optimization pro is saying it has the most recent firmware but I haven't updated the lens in a while. I should add that the last firmware update mentioned improved af accuracy with a teleconverter attached.

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2016 at 22:17 UTC as 2nd comment

Great article, I recently bought the sigma version and am really happy with the image quality.

Quick question though, you mention this:

"What should not be underestimated is the necessity for an even faster minimum shutter speed when using this lens on a camera with an APS-C sensor. The difference between 600mm and 960mm is considerable and if you are constantly using the lens at its furthest reach, it will eventually limit the length of time you can use the lens at dawn or dusk when you're struggling for enough shutter speed to keep it steady."

It is my understanding that simply having a crop sensor doesn't affect the shutter speed rule of 1/focal length. Hence 1/600 should still be fine for a 7d mark II which crops the image to 960mm.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 15:35 UTC as 33rd comment | 3 replies
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II Review (514 comments in total)

"the flash offers a working distance of 0.30 to 15 meters."

are you serious? Not even canon's top of the line external flash will do much at 15 meters (~50 feet)

These may be the specs but you guys should list real world numbers. I really don't think this flash would do much past 10 feet.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2013 at 04:39 UTC as 58th comment

I can't believe canon went backwards with the wireless transmitter. anyone that used the transmitters on the 5d or 1d mk II (or IIn) know how horrible it was to have to connect a cable from the camera to the transmitter. Canon made a huge stride with the 1d mk III/IV and 5d mark II allowing the transmitter to connect directly to the camera and making the transmitter into a vertical grip on the 5d mk II. Why change the design from the mark II? boo canon. boo.

edit: I should add what a waste it is to have gigabit ethernet as a feature when it will be completely bottle necked by usb 2.0

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2012 at 21:29 UTC as 10th comment
On article Nikon D4 overview (837 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mssimo: No USB 3.0? Would be nice to use with new XQD card.

to shaocaholica: I am a professional, in fact I shoot for the new york times so I am surprised by your comment. Every single professional I know uses card readers so why by my comment would you assume I am not?

to petka: although I am a newpaper photographer I do have studio experience and have shot tethered myself. I just don't see usb 3 as an important upgrade, even shooting raw with a 1ds mk iii the photos pop up almost instantly over usb 2.0.

There were some good comments made about shooting tethered and I suppose usb 3 could help there but I would personally use the ethernet connection to shoot tethered but usb 2.0 would also be more than enough for speed.

In the end a card reader is many times faster than using the camera, I would rather put wear and tear on a card reader then a 6000 dollar camera, and there is battery life to think about as well.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2012 at 18:47 UTC
On article Nikon D4 overview (837 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mssimo: No USB 3.0? Would be nice to use with new XQD card.

professionals don't plug their cameras into their computers they use dedicated readers.

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2012 at 04:01 UTC
Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12