Lives in Latvia Riga, Latvia
Works as a Head of road materials testing laboratory
Has a website at
Joined on Feb 3, 2004
About me:

Pentax K20D,
Pentax K10D,
Pentax K100D,
Pentax *ist DL,
Pentax MZ-6,
Pentax 645; (*2)
Pentax 645n,
Pentax Super ME,
Yashica mat 124g,
Beautyflex camera 6*6,
Speed Graphic Crown 4*5 large format,
Panasonic FZ20,
Etc (some box wit old Russian cameras).

Pentax 360fgz (*4)
Pentax 540fgz (*2)
Sigma EF500 Super,
Vivitar (TTL flash)

Fixed lenses:
Pentax DA 14mm f2.8
Pentax DA 15mm f4.0 limited
Sigma 15mm F2.8 fisheye
Pentax DA 21mm f3.2
Pentax K 28mm f3.5 shift
Pentax FA 31mm f1.8
Pentax FA 35mm f3.5 (645)
Pentax FA 43mm f1.9
Pentax FA 50mm f1.4
Pentax M 50mm f2.0
Sigma 50mm f2.8 macro
Pentax FA 77mm f1.8
Pentax FA 75mm f2.8 (645)
Pentax A 75mm f2.8 (645)
Pentax FA 85mm f1.4
Pentax FA 120mm macro f4.0 (645)
Voigtländer 125mm f2.5 APO Lanthar (KA mount)
Sears 135mm f2.5 (KA mount)
Aubell 135mm f2.5 (KA mount)
Pentax FA 150mm f2.8 (645)
Pentax FA 200mm f4.0 (645)
Pentax FA 300mm f4.0 (645)

Pentax DA 10-17mm fisheye
Pentax DA 16-45mm
Pentax DA 18-55mm
Pentax DA 50-200mm
Pentax DAL 50-300mm
Pentax FA 45-85mm (645)
Pentax FA 80-160mm (645)
Sigma 24-70mm
Sigma 70-300mm Apo Macro
Phoenix Gold Samyang 650-1300mm f/8-16


Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Clint Dunn: I can't believe how many nutjob comments on here from the 'Truther' fools saying this is fake...'like the moon landing'. What has society come to that masses of people have such a distrust for their gov't that they want to re-write history. Some of these idiots even think the Earth is flat:

Please tell me most of you were just fooling around or trying to be ironic...and not just complete morons.

I never lived near any NASA guy, so I can`t be sure that Moon exist! I can shoot it with mirror lens+teleconverter (more than 2000mm on 1.4x crop) but I am not sure - may be it is just big banner in the sky?

Can you prove that Moon exist?

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2016 at 20:40 UTC
In reply to:

Rick Knepper: What's the application for a 17 hour exposure?

RGBCMYK, I do not see reason for you to write that comment anyway - all of us will die. So, no point to buy that filter or read comments here.

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2016 at 20:35 UTC
In reply to:

sleibson: Yow! $175 for a filter. I've bought entire lenses that are less expensive.

Minion, take one pic with macro lens at f5.6 with filter and without filter. Compare results for some details. You will be surprised.

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2016 at 20:34 UTC
In reply to:

photominion: I'd like to see some "exposure" on DPR for the German brand Feisol.

They build amazin tripods at great prices.

Yes, Taiwanese tripod maker Feisol was one of the first Gitzo Knock offs. SLightly better finished than Benro (years ago on forums were rumors that Benro is Gitzo factory, just bussiness project failed and chinese brave people continued that good idea to produce carbon tripods for cheaper price).

But at the moment Sirui outbeat all other knockoffs for price and functionality - be it Feisol, Benro or Induro.

Link | Posted on Jan 31, 2016 at 16:07 UTC
In reply to:

WastingTime: Studio pros won't even look at this system unless they add some modern Leaf shutter lenses to the lineup, that will make for a competitive system against Phase One. And yet they keep NOT doing that, what a shame.

Wasting time comment.

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2015 at 17:30 UTC
In reply to:

Satyaa: I am not a pro, nor an MF enthusiast, but I have always felt that this camera and its lenses were priced higher than they should be. I feel the same about this plan.

If the product prices (as well as this plan's) were lower at least a third (or even more), I think that there would be a wider market.

Lot of enthusiasts who are saturated with the 35mm FF cameras would then turn to MF... all they need is a landscape lens and a portrait lens. I am not arguing who needs it or who would benefit from it, but those reasons won't stop enthusiasts from buying :)

> If the product prices (as well as this plan's) were lower at least a third (or even more)...

It`s already lower for third or even more!
Check out Leica S2, Phase one and Hasselblad.

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2015 at 09:53 UTC
In reply to:

Frantisek Mazac: Hmm a bit more than expensive .-( We print on Baryta paper 60x40 cm for 11euro with 21%VAT :-) on CANON IMP8400 -
Adujsted on 5 mm foam board for together for 15 euro and framed into aluminium frame for 23 euro all together :-)

It's without point.
Because we can`t know what quality is acceptable for you. If they use chinese inks and papers, there is zero longevitiy for that print under organic glass. And B&W pictures will have slight shifft to green/magenta or something like that.

But may be not.

Althogh I bet for 98% - there is something "you pay for what you get".

And mentioned organic glass means - your standards is average user taste. Because arhival quality talks about matte paper always, so... There is no option for glossy organic on it.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2015 at 19:54 UTC
On article Pentax 645Z added to studio comparison database (141 comments in total)
In reply to:

Felix E Klee: In a professional context, for example for fashion photography in a studio, what is the advantage of a medium format camera today?

Today's full frame sensors and optics provide more than enough resolution for even very large printed ads, and dynamic range there is plenty as well. Furthermore, in a studio environment, I expect lighting to be perfect and the pro photographer to frame close to the final result.

For landscape photography medium format is interesting, but that's not my question.

Lecia S2 of course is complete crap, but for 2x higer price. I tried both. Don`t own any.

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2014 at 18:28 UTC
In reply to:

(unknown member): I like Microsoft products and this one is very exciting!

I like Microsoft products.

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2014 at 10:14 UTC
On article Adobe expands Photoshop and Lightroom offer (628 comments in total)
In reply to:

Fred Dominic: Adobe is finished in my book unless they go back to being able to purchase the software that you use. The idea of "renting" software makes no sense. What if they change their policy in the future, all of the files in their proprietary format that is stored on your own computers, and all of the many hours spent producing those files will be locked away. Adobe is like a virus, in fact, it is similar to the virus CryptoLocker, where if you don't pay, there is no way to use your files.

Rentin software makes sense - if you can`t implement anything worth for customers to pay for new version, then make that last one payable monthly. I mean - chosing this offer one kills progress. Adobe neeeds stable cash flow and they will doo everything to develop new tricks to atract customers to new bling-blings. Pay monthly - no more new bling-blings.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2013 at 20:03 UTC
On article Adobe expands Photoshop and Lightroom offer (628 comments in total)

What If...

I purchase thru PROXY USA server cheaper ($9.99) than with European IP address for €12,29?

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2013 at 20:00 UTC as 160th comment | 3 replies
On article Samsung announces curved Galaxy Round (143 comments in total)
In reply to:

sensibill: Really, I have never seen a product from a manufacturer I give my money to (several Samsung cameras and phones in the past few years) that makes as little sense as this.

I have rather new phone, but... I change them once per five years. Would I need to change phone now - it would be the best option! I can imagine better placement in pocket (it gets around leg). It is more safe for cracks - when it fall down, screeen is inside, not like all thes cracked Iphone screens what we see in hands of our friends.

Link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 22:25 UTC
In reply to:

Kodachrome200: This is why I love these new chinese lighting companies. i cant believe they want 200 bux for this. I just bought a similar thing for $25. I have been in photography for a long time and its great to buy 50 dollar soft boxes and the like

Because people are so unpredictable, amazing, funny, creative!
For example, I tried that 20$ thing with Voigtlander 125mm macro lens. Just because I have that lens. Indeed, I hoped to take pictures of hundreds of cylindric cosmetic objects. Polished surfaces. It totally failed. Then prepared kind of lightbox with black fat vertical lines inside. Placed on sides falshes and voila - perfect! Then I tried THING in garden, fail again. So, no matter how much it cost, for good result one needs to use proper tools and light. But I know, a lot of peole will try £99.00 Just because on ebay there is cheap knock offs - expencive original might be good thing! ;)

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2013 at 12:42 UTC
In reply to:

Kodachrome200: This is why I love these new chinese lighting companies. i cant believe they want 200 bux for this. I just bought a similar thing for $25. I have been in photography for a long time and its great to buy 50 dollar soft boxes and the like

I bought similar gadget two years ago for 20$ with free shipping. And I am sure, that thing above is also almost total crap like 20$ knock offs. Just used couple of times and decided to use two/three flashes from side.

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2013 at 14:27 UTC
On article DxO Labs unveils Optics Pro 8 with Smart Lighting (35 comments in total)
In reply to:

okada01: Hello from Ukraine ;)

Hello Hohol!

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 16:05 UTC
On article Samsung US announces rugged and waterproof SD cards (49 comments in total)

Are there any word what kind of chip they are using? SLC or MLC? If it is MLC (and it is, like 99,9% cards nowadays), all these magnets, trucks, waterproof ar just empty sounds. I guess last compny who is using that extremely expencive and reliable(!) SLC chip is INTEGRAL. I bought their 16GB INTEGRAL ENDURANCE card for really responsible events (like wedding ceremonies, etc) And it really works flawlessly. With testt and with practical observation.

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2012 at 20:22 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

Joseph S Wisniewski: Is the 560/5.6 a mirror lens? The press release says

"thanks to the adoption of optics used in astronomical telescopes"

Minolta had an autofocus mirror, so it is possible.

Definetly! Mirror F5.6

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 00:00 UTC

I agree with bride.
400$ for average of best photographers is good price. It`s just matter of time when some harder crisis will hit. After that, a lot of advanced hobbyists will go for wedding extra income. At that moment prices can fall to almost nothing. I have seen this personally.

Link | Posted on Jan 27, 2012 at 11:21 UTC as 227th comment
On article Just published - a quick Pentax 645D sample gallery (131 comments in total)
In reply to:

00112233: Pentax 645D body is 156x117x119mm and weights 1480g. incl. batt.
Canon EOS 1DX as announced is 158x164x83mm and weights "TBC"
Now, to find out what TBC is we can assume that physically has the same type of construction and materials as the EOS 1D Mark IV which is smaller and weights 1230g. incl. batt., the 1DX will then weight more, specially if we include the wireless file transmitter and the GPS receiver. The difference in weight between the 645D and the 1DX will become very small indeed. So I wonder who is going to have pains in shoulders. Fortunately most professionals have assistants that help carrying equipment!

Harley Davidson has only two wheels, but my VW Golf has 4 working ones and one extra!

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2011 at 13:59 UTC
Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »