Kerusker

In camera you only get  'fine jpg'. Can Imaging Edge generate 'extra-fine jpg' from ARW?

Dean, according to your theory, the EXIF of the above shot should contain the applied AF/FA value: AF Adjustment = 16 Could you please supply the original JPG or RAW?

Suse, this kind of AF-FA discussion happened to me when I switched from the K10D to the K5. Now with the K1 only minor facts are different. Instead of following the (partly wrong) advice, there's ...

Since this post hasn't vanished from the first dpr page yet, I will answer my question myself: tom1803's statement above isn't true for the P-A 24mm F/2.8 :( On the P-A 24mm the 3 small screws ...

Is this also true for the 24mm Pentax-A lens? (I think and hope so.) Can somebody confirm? I don't want to remove the rubber grip in vain. Thanks tom1803 for your good advice (below).

As Richard asked for it, here we go: At the top of page 1 you find the most important hints in a rectangle: (1) Fn-Functions marked blue: The menu items marked blue can be ...

bump Some new RX10M4 owners may find this useful (at least some questions on this forum support my guess).

Chris, your experience and judgment may be well supported by reality, but that's no reason for not raising our user requirements. Otherwise those 'managers' win without a battle. And ... Sony ...

at least for the RX10 V there should be a customer wish list according to the statements Sony interview - 'I don’t care about competitors, I care about customers' Mr Tanaka's list of customer ...

I have mixed up my wording resp. logic. That sentence above should read: a) This doesn't tell that it's lossy, but ARW 2 is lossy and I have not found any hint yet that ARW 2.3.3 isn't lossy. or b) ...

Rachael, some may very safely assume that the ARW files of the RX10M4 are lossless, but I doubt that this is justified. In the EXIF data of an RX10M4 raw image (ARW file) you find the following ...

How safely?

Thanks for the link (I haven't read it yet). That's what I have found about 7 month ago: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60858121

sorry, my wording is not easy to read - I know. That's very good - no doubt. But I think it doesn't break the 'ETTR rule'.

Hi Elliott, observe that in case (C) of the diagram I have chosen ETTR at ISO 100.

Isabel, thanks for bringing this up - it made me think again. Roger N. Clark ( http://www.clarkvision.com/index.html ) has set up easy to read pages about ISO etc.: ...

you may be the first member to find it useful :) https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/61471295

Thanks for the answer - also to Michael. That is for the conventional ND filter - right? What's about the variable electronic ND filter? https://pro.sony/en_LT/products/handheld-camcorders/camcorde ...