rdscibilia

Joined on Aug 13, 2013

Comments

Total: 46, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On article 2015 Roundups: Fixed Prime Lens Cameras (231 comments in total)
In reply to:

Christian Grevstad: Why are you writing the RICOH GR ii is "one of the smallest fixed lens APS-C cameras currently on the market", when it's by far the smallest ever made??

The Coolpix A may be discontinued, but I bought one just a few months ago for 400 bucks . Excellent camera

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2015 at 07:04 UTC
In reply to:

Dillon Frazier: When you can get a real mirrorless camera like the G7 or a6000 for this price, how does Canon expect to sell any of these? (Aside from the fact that there are people who will buy for the name)

I bought the original M when it was $299. It's a very good $299 camera. Take that as you will.

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2015 at 20:37 UTC
In reply to:

JackM: Anyone who posts negatively about this child or these photographs is a first class d.b.

/deleted/

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2015 at 17:20 UTC
On article Opinion: The myth of the upgrade path (1593 comments in total)

"Full-frame" is an arbitrary metric, a carry-over from the celluloid era. There is nothing sacred about that or any other pixel matrix or pixel size. Sensor size is far from the most important aspect of serious photography.

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2015 at 17:39 UTC as 477th comment
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)
In reply to:

rdscibilia: I thought The EOS M had been discontinued...

I own one. Better than the rumors.

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2014 at 17:45 UTC
On article 2014 iPhone Photography Awards winners announced (102 comments in total)
In reply to:

Manah: phone photography! What is the freaking point? Is it because they are too lazy to carry a real camera and lenses that we should make this a topic? Ridiculous! DPreview, please focus on photography, not cell phones.

Ah, the real and the unreal, only this time applied to cameras themselves. :). Let me assure you that the iPhone is a "real" camera.

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2014 at 13:31 UTC
On article 2014 iPhone Photography Awards winners announced (102 comments in total)
In reply to:

Morgan David: All great, exept for the cheating picture 6 that most certainly is not shot with a smartphone.
This DOF is not achievable with the size of the iPhone sensor.

Smartphones are often criticized for their alleged inability to produce shallow focus, bokeh effects, etc. i'm simply remarking that this style was not always as favored as it appears to be today.

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2014 at 13:28 UTC
On article 2014 iPhone Photography Awards winners announced (102 comments in total)
In reply to:

Morgan David: All great, exept for the cheating picture 6 that most certainly is not shot with a smartphone.
This DOF is not achievable with the size of the iPhone sensor.

What makes you think that shallow focus is a superior way to make photographs? You have heard, in cinema, of people like Orson Welles and William Wyler? Sometimes you want shallow focus, sometimes you want deep focus.

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2014 at 19:31 UTC
On article New camera app features in Apple's iOS 8 (67 comments in total)
In reply to:

tomatoketchup: Excellent... more tyros holding their gigantic pads out at arms length will now be able to swing their monstrosities from left to right, looking even more like complete tools.

Yes, we all know photography is about how you look doing it.

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2014 at 00:14 UTC
On article New camera app features in Apple's iOS 8 (67 comments in total)
In reply to:

rdscibilia: The iPhone needs more megapixels, although it appears Apple is not going in this direction. A quality eight-megapixel image is fine, but you need some space for cropping.

Okay, I'll settle for 10. :)

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2014 at 22:23 UTC
On article New camera app features in Apple's iOS 8 (67 comments in total)

The iPhone needs more megapixels, although it appears Apple is not going in this direction. A quality eight-megapixel image is fine, but you need some space for cropping.

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2014 at 17:40 UTC as 8th comment | 4 replies
On article MIT algorithm predicts photo popularity (90 comments in total)

I suggest we use the same calculator for eugenics studies. Why should we have to suffer with people who don't have the right look?

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2014 at 16:01 UTC as 29th comment | 1 reply
On article MIT algorithm predicts photo popularity (90 comments in total)
In reply to:

ManuelVilardeMacedo: This is completely stupid. But, if people get paid to create stupid algorythms, who am I to get in the way? Oh well...

Or be analyzing questionnaires without ever stepping into the real world.

The social sciences have become a travesty.

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2014 at 15:56 UTC
On article MIT algorithm predicts photo popularity (90 comments in total)

The opposite of popular is not dull.

Leave it to a PhD candidate to miss the real point.

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2014 at 15:50 UTC as 30th comment | 1 reply
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)
In reply to:

blink667: Beautiful camera, but $2000 for $500 worth of performance?

So...is a Leica "high maintenance?" :)

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 04:27 UTC
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)

This is the kind of camera Mick Jagger will buy 10 of to give to his friends as Christmas gifts.

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 16:06 UTC as 606th comment | 1 reply
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)

I thought The EOS M had been discontinued...

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 15:42 UTC as 623rd comment | 3 replies
Total: 46, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »